Loss of Magnet® Designation and Changes in RN Work Engagement: A Report on How 1 Hospital's Culture Changed over Time

Amy Hagedorn Wonder, Jacki York, Kathryn L. Jackson, Teresa D. Sluys

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to examine the loss of Magnet® designation and how RNs' work engagement changed at 1 community hospital. BACKGROUND The importance of RN work engagement to promote quality and safety is widely recognized in healthcare. Ongoing consistent research is critical to determine what organizational structures are needed to support RN work engagement. METHODS This was a comparative, descriptive, correlational study of RN cohorts at 2 time points: time 1 (T1), in 2011 during Magnet designation (n = 119), and time 2 (T2), in 2016, approximately 2 years after the loss of Magnet designation (n = 140). RESULTS The cohort of RNs at T2 reported significantly lower work engagement in the time period after the loss of Magnet designation when compared with the RN cohort at T1 during Magnet designation (P ≤.0002). CONCLUSION These results provide insights for clinical leaders striving to support a culture of RN work engagement and quality care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)491-496
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Nursing Administration
Volume47
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2017

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Leadership and Management

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Loss of Magnet® Designation and Changes in RN Work Engagement: A Report on How 1 Hospital's Culture Changed over Time'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this