Low diagnostic yield of transduodenal endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy using the 19-gauge Flex needle

A large multicenter prospective study

Fabia Attili, Carlo Fabbri, Ichiro Yasuda, Lorenzo Fuccio, Laurent Palazzo, Ilaria Tarantino, John DeWitt, Leonardo Frazzoni, Mihai Rimbas, Alberto Larghi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Previous limited experiences have reported the 19-gauge flexible needle to be highly effective in performing endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) for transduodenal lesions. We designed a large multicenter prospective study with the aim at evaluating the performance of this newly developed needle. Patients and Methods: Consecutive patients with solid lesions who needed to undergo EUS sampling from the duodenum were enrolled in 6 tertiary care referral centers. Puncture of the lesion was performed with the 19-gauge flexible needle (Expect™ and Slimline Expect™ 19 Flex). The feasibility, procurement yield, and diagnostic accuracy were evaluated. Results: Totally, 246 patients (144 males, mean age 65.1 ± 12.7 years) with solid lesions (203 cases) or enlarged lymph nodes (43 cases) were enrolled, with a mean size of 32.6 ± 12.2 mm. The procedure was technically feasible in 228 patients, with an overall procurement yield of 76.8%. Two centers had suboptimal procurement yields (66.7% and 64.2%). Major complications occurred in six cases: two of bleeding, two of mild acute pancreatitis, one perforation requiring surgery, and one duodenal hematoma. Considering malignant versus nonmalignant disease, the sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative likelihood ratios, and diagnostic accuracy were 70.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 64.3-76.6), 100% (95% CI: 79.6-100), 35.3 (95% CI: 2.3-549.8)/0.3 (95% CI: 0.2-0.4), and 73.6% (95% CI: 67.6-79). On multivariate analysis, the only determinant of successful EUS-FNB was the center in which the procedure was performed. Conclusions: Our results suggest that the use of the 19-gauge flexible needle cannot be widely advocated and its implementation should receive local validation after careful evaluation of both the technical success rates and diagnostic yield.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)402-408
Number of pages7
JournalEndoscopic Ultrasound
Volume6
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2017

Fingerprint

Fine Needle Biopsy
Multicenter Studies
Needles
Prospective Studies
Confidence Intervals
Tertiary Care Centers
Duodenum
Punctures
Hematoma
Pancreatitis
Multivariate Analysis
Lymph Nodes
Hemorrhage
Sensitivity and Specificity

Keywords

  • 19-gauge flexible needle
  • Nitinol endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration needle
  • Transduodenal endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Low diagnostic yield of transduodenal endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy using the 19-gauge Flex needle : A large multicenter prospective study. / Attili, Fabia; Fabbri, Carlo; Yasuda, Ichiro; Fuccio, Lorenzo; Palazzo, Laurent; Tarantino, Ilaria; DeWitt, John; Frazzoni, Leonardo; Rimbas, Mihai; Larghi, Alberto.

In: Endoscopic Ultrasound, Vol. 6, No. 6, 01.11.2017, p. 402-408.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Attili, Fabia ; Fabbri, Carlo ; Yasuda, Ichiro ; Fuccio, Lorenzo ; Palazzo, Laurent ; Tarantino, Ilaria ; DeWitt, John ; Frazzoni, Leonardo ; Rimbas, Mihai ; Larghi, Alberto. / Low diagnostic yield of transduodenal endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy using the 19-gauge Flex needle : A large multicenter prospective study. In: Endoscopic Ultrasound. 2017 ; Vol. 6, No. 6. pp. 402-408.
@article{19e8d33dfa2643aba1d1d8624a4571fc,
title = "Low diagnostic yield of transduodenal endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy using the 19-gauge Flex needle: A large multicenter prospective study",
abstract = "Background and Objectives: Previous limited experiences have reported the 19-gauge flexible needle to be highly effective in performing endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) for transduodenal lesions. We designed a large multicenter prospective study with the aim at evaluating the performance of this newly developed needle. Patients and Methods: Consecutive patients with solid lesions who needed to undergo EUS sampling from the duodenum were enrolled in 6 tertiary care referral centers. Puncture of the lesion was performed with the 19-gauge flexible needle (Expect™ and Slimline Expect™ 19 Flex). The feasibility, procurement yield, and diagnostic accuracy were evaluated. Results: Totally, 246 patients (144 males, mean age 65.1 ± 12.7 years) with solid lesions (203 cases) or enlarged lymph nodes (43 cases) were enrolled, with a mean size of 32.6 ± 12.2 mm. The procedure was technically feasible in 228 patients, with an overall procurement yield of 76.8{\%}. Two centers had suboptimal procurement yields (66.7{\%} and 64.2{\%}). Major complications occurred in six cases: two of bleeding, two of mild acute pancreatitis, one perforation requiring surgery, and one duodenal hematoma. Considering malignant versus nonmalignant disease, the sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative likelihood ratios, and diagnostic accuracy were 70.7{\%} (95{\%} confidence interval [CI]: 64.3-76.6), 100{\%} (95{\%} CI: 79.6-100), 35.3 (95{\%} CI: 2.3-549.8)/0.3 (95{\%} CI: 0.2-0.4), and 73.6{\%} (95{\%} CI: 67.6-79). On multivariate analysis, the only determinant of successful EUS-FNB was the center in which the procedure was performed. Conclusions: Our results suggest that the use of the 19-gauge flexible needle cannot be widely advocated and its implementation should receive local validation after careful evaluation of both the technical success rates and diagnostic yield.",
keywords = "19-gauge flexible needle, Nitinol endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration needle, Transduodenal endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition",
author = "Fabia Attili and Carlo Fabbri and Ichiro Yasuda and Lorenzo Fuccio and Laurent Palazzo and Ilaria Tarantino and John DeWitt and Leonardo Frazzoni and Mihai Rimbas and Alberto Larghi",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4103/eus.eus_54_17",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "402--408",
journal = "Endoscopic Ultrasound",
issn = "2226-7190",
publisher = "Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Low diagnostic yield of transduodenal endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy using the 19-gauge Flex needle

T2 - A large multicenter prospective study

AU - Attili, Fabia

AU - Fabbri, Carlo

AU - Yasuda, Ichiro

AU - Fuccio, Lorenzo

AU - Palazzo, Laurent

AU - Tarantino, Ilaria

AU - DeWitt, John

AU - Frazzoni, Leonardo

AU - Rimbas, Mihai

AU - Larghi, Alberto

PY - 2017/11/1

Y1 - 2017/11/1

N2 - Background and Objectives: Previous limited experiences have reported the 19-gauge flexible needle to be highly effective in performing endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) for transduodenal lesions. We designed a large multicenter prospective study with the aim at evaluating the performance of this newly developed needle. Patients and Methods: Consecutive patients with solid lesions who needed to undergo EUS sampling from the duodenum were enrolled in 6 tertiary care referral centers. Puncture of the lesion was performed with the 19-gauge flexible needle (Expect™ and Slimline Expect™ 19 Flex). The feasibility, procurement yield, and diagnostic accuracy were evaluated. Results: Totally, 246 patients (144 males, mean age 65.1 ± 12.7 years) with solid lesions (203 cases) or enlarged lymph nodes (43 cases) were enrolled, with a mean size of 32.6 ± 12.2 mm. The procedure was technically feasible in 228 patients, with an overall procurement yield of 76.8%. Two centers had suboptimal procurement yields (66.7% and 64.2%). Major complications occurred in six cases: two of bleeding, two of mild acute pancreatitis, one perforation requiring surgery, and one duodenal hematoma. Considering malignant versus nonmalignant disease, the sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative likelihood ratios, and diagnostic accuracy were 70.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 64.3-76.6), 100% (95% CI: 79.6-100), 35.3 (95% CI: 2.3-549.8)/0.3 (95% CI: 0.2-0.4), and 73.6% (95% CI: 67.6-79). On multivariate analysis, the only determinant of successful EUS-FNB was the center in which the procedure was performed. Conclusions: Our results suggest that the use of the 19-gauge flexible needle cannot be widely advocated and its implementation should receive local validation after careful evaluation of both the technical success rates and diagnostic yield.

AB - Background and Objectives: Previous limited experiences have reported the 19-gauge flexible needle to be highly effective in performing endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) for transduodenal lesions. We designed a large multicenter prospective study with the aim at evaluating the performance of this newly developed needle. Patients and Methods: Consecutive patients with solid lesions who needed to undergo EUS sampling from the duodenum were enrolled in 6 tertiary care referral centers. Puncture of the lesion was performed with the 19-gauge flexible needle (Expect™ and Slimline Expect™ 19 Flex). The feasibility, procurement yield, and diagnostic accuracy were evaluated. Results: Totally, 246 patients (144 males, mean age 65.1 ± 12.7 years) with solid lesions (203 cases) or enlarged lymph nodes (43 cases) were enrolled, with a mean size of 32.6 ± 12.2 mm. The procedure was technically feasible in 228 patients, with an overall procurement yield of 76.8%. Two centers had suboptimal procurement yields (66.7% and 64.2%). Major complications occurred in six cases: two of bleeding, two of mild acute pancreatitis, one perforation requiring surgery, and one duodenal hematoma. Considering malignant versus nonmalignant disease, the sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative likelihood ratios, and diagnostic accuracy were 70.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 64.3-76.6), 100% (95% CI: 79.6-100), 35.3 (95% CI: 2.3-549.8)/0.3 (95% CI: 0.2-0.4), and 73.6% (95% CI: 67.6-79). On multivariate analysis, the only determinant of successful EUS-FNB was the center in which the procedure was performed. Conclusions: Our results suggest that the use of the 19-gauge flexible needle cannot be widely advocated and its implementation should receive local validation after careful evaluation of both the technical success rates and diagnostic yield.

KW - 19-gauge flexible needle

KW - Nitinol endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration needle

KW - Transduodenal endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85039808529&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85039808529&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4103/eus.eus_54_17

DO - 10.4103/eus.eus_54_17

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 402

EP - 408

JO - Endoscopic Ultrasound

JF - Endoscopic Ultrasound

SN - 2226-7190

IS - 6

ER -