Lumbar spondylolysis without spondylolisthesis: Recognition of isolated posterior element subluxation on sagittal MR

J. L. Ulmer, Vincent Mathews, A. D. Elster, J. C. King

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To document the occurrence of isolated dorsal subluxation of posterior elements in cases of lumbar spondylolysis without spondylolisthesis both quantitatively (using spinal canal measurements) and qualitatively (by visual inspection) on sagittal MR images. METHODS: Retrospective analysis identified 63 patients with lumbar spondylolysis (confirmed by CT or conventional radiography) who had undergone MR imaging. From these we identified 12 patients with pars interarticularis defects but no evidence of spondylolisthesis. Measurements of anteroposterior spinal canal diameters were performed in these 12 patients to ascertain whether the sagittal canal diameter at the level of the spondylolysis exceeded the normal range as determined from 100 control subjects. RESULTS: In 9 of 12 patients the spinal canal was abnormally widened at the level of the spondylolysis because of dorsal subluxation of posterior elements. In 5 of these patients, the subluxation was readily visible on midline sagittal MR images. In 4 patients, spinal canal measurements were necessary to document this phenomenon. CONCLUSION: In the majority of patients with spondylolysis but without spondylolisthesis, sagittal MR images can show isolated dorsal subluxation of posterior spinal elements.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1393-1398
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology
Volume16
Issue number7
StatePublished - 1995
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Spondylolysis
Spondylolisthesis
Spinal Canal
Radiography
Reference Values

Keywords

  • Spine, dislocation
  • Spine, magnetic resonance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Lumbar spondylolysis without spondylolisthesis : Recognition of isolated posterior element subluxation on sagittal MR. / Ulmer, J. L.; Mathews, Vincent; Elster, A. D.; King, J. C.

In: American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol. 16, No. 7, 1995, p. 1393-1398.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0963ccc80fab48abb3dd496e840eb151,
title = "Lumbar spondylolysis without spondylolisthesis: Recognition of isolated posterior element subluxation on sagittal MR",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To document the occurrence of isolated dorsal subluxation of posterior elements in cases of lumbar spondylolysis without spondylolisthesis both quantitatively (using spinal canal measurements) and qualitatively (by visual inspection) on sagittal MR images. METHODS: Retrospective analysis identified 63 patients with lumbar spondylolysis (confirmed by CT or conventional radiography) who had undergone MR imaging. From these we identified 12 patients with pars interarticularis defects but no evidence of spondylolisthesis. Measurements of anteroposterior spinal canal diameters were performed in these 12 patients to ascertain whether the sagittal canal diameter at the level of the spondylolysis exceeded the normal range as determined from 100 control subjects. RESULTS: In 9 of 12 patients the spinal canal was abnormally widened at the level of the spondylolysis because of dorsal subluxation of posterior elements. In 5 of these patients, the subluxation was readily visible on midline sagittal MR images. In 4 patients, spinal canal measurements were necessary to document this phenomenon. CONCLUSION: In the majority of patients with spondylolysis but without spondylolisthesis, sagittal MR images can show isolated dorsal subluxation of posterior spinal elements.",
keywords = "Spine, dislocation, Spine, magnetic resonance",
author = "Ulmer, {J. L.} and Vincent Mathews and Elster, {A. D.} and King, {J. C.}",
year = "1995",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "1393--1398",
journal = "American Journal of Neuroradiology",
issn = "0195-6108",
publisher = "American Society of Neuroradiology",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lumbar spondylolysis without spondylolisthesis

T2 - Recognition of isolated posterior element subluxation on sagittal MR

AU - Ulmer, J. L.

AU - Mathews, Vincent

AU - Elster, A. D.

AU - King, J. C.

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - PURPOSE: To document the occurrence of isolated dorsal subluxation of posterior elements in cases of lumbar spondylolysis without spondylolisthesis both quantitatively (using spinal canal measurements) and qualitatively (by visual inspection) on sagittal MR images. METHODS: Retrospective analysis identified 63 patients with lumbar spondylolysis (confirmed by CT or conventional radiography) who had undergone MR imaging. From these we identified 12 patients with pars interarticularis defects but no evidence of spondylolisthesis. Measurements of anteroposterior spinal canal diameters were performed in these 12 patients to ascertain whether the sagittal canal diameter at the level of the spondylolysis exceeded the normal range as determined from 100 control subjects. RESULTS: In 9 of 12 patients the spinal canal was abnormally widened at the level of the spondylolysis because of dorsal subluxation of posterior elements. In 5 of these patients, the subluxation was readily visible on midline sagittal MR images. In 4 patients, spinal canal measurements were necessary to document this phenomenon. CONCLUSION: In the majority of patients with spondylolysis but without spondylolisthesis, sagittal MR images can show isolated dorsal subluxation of posterior spinal elements.

AB - PURPOSE: To document the occurrence of isolated dorsal subluxation of posterior elements in cases of lumbar spondylolysis without spondylolisthesis both quantitatively (using spinal canal measurements) and qualitatively (by visual inspection) on sagittal MR images. METHODS: Retrospective analysis identified 63 patients with lumbar spondylolysis (confirmed by CT or conventional radiography) who had undergone MR imaging. From these we identified 12 patients with pars interarticularis defects but no evidence of spondylolisthesis. Measurements of anteroposterior spinal canal diameters were performed in these 12 patients to ascertain whether the sagittal canal diameter at the level of the spondylolysis exceeded the normal range as determined from 100 control subjects. RESULTS: In 9 of 12 patients the spinal canal was abnormally widened at the level of the spondylolysis because of dorsal subluxation of posterior elements. In 5 of these patients, the subluxation was readily visible on midline sagittal MR images. In 4 patients, spinal canal measurements were necessary to document this phenomenon. CONCLUSION: In the majority of patients with spondylolysis but without spondylolisthesis, sagittal MR images can show isolated dorsal subluxation of posterior spinal elements.

KW - Spine, dislocation

KW - Spine, magnetic resonance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029086509&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029086509&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 7484621

AN - SCOPUS:0029086509

VL - 16

SP - 1393

EP - 1398

JO - American Journal of Neuroradiology

JF - American Journal of Neuroradiology

SN - 0195-6108

IS - 7

ER -