Making decisions for Hospitalized older adults

Ethical factors considered by family surrogates

Jenna Fritsch, Sandra Petronio, Paul Helft, Alexia Torke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Hospitalized older adults frequently have impaired cognition and must rely on surrogates to make major medical decisions. Ethical standards for surrogate decision making are well delineated, but little is known about what factors surrogates actually consider when making decisions. Objectives: To determine factors surrogate decision makers consider when making major medical decisions for hospitalized older adults, and whether or not they adhere to established ethical standards. Design: Semi-structured interview study of the experience and process of decision making. Setting: A public safety-net hospital and a tertiary referral hospital in a large city in the Midwest United States. Participants: The study Included 35 surrogates with a recent decision-making experience for an inpatient aged 65 or older. Measurements: The key factors that surrogates considered when making decisions. Interview transcripts were coded and analyzed using the grounded theory method of qualitative analysis. Results: Surrogates considered patient-centered factors and surrogate-centered factors. Patient-centered factors included: (1) respecting the patient's input, (2) using past knowledge of the patient to infer the patient's wishes, and (3) considering what is in the patient's best interests. Some surrogates expressed a desire for more information about the patient's prior wishes. Surrogate-centered factors included: (1) surrogate's wishes as a guide, (2) surrogate's religious beliefs and/or spirituality, (3) surrogate's interests, and (4) family consensus. Conclusion Our study indicates that surrogate decision making is more complex than the standard ethical models, which are limited to considerations of the patient's autonomy and beneficence. Because surrogates also imagine what they would want under the circumstances and consider their own needs and preferences, models of surrogate decision making must account for these additional considerations. Surrogates' desire for more information about patients' preferences suggests a need for greater advance care planning.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)125-134
Number of pages10
JournalThe Journal of clinical ethics
Volume24
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jun 2013

Fingerprint

Decision Making
decision making
Safety-net Providers
Advance Care Planning
Interviews
Beneficence
Spirituality
interview
large city
Patient Preference
spirituality
grounded theory
Religion
decision maker
Tertiary Care Centers
cognition
experience
Cognition
autonomy
Inpatients

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects
  • Health(social science)

Cite this

Making decisions for Hospitalized older adults : Ethical factors considered by family surrogates. / Fritsch, Jenna; Petronio, Sandra; Helft, Paul; Torke, Alexia.

In: The Journal of clinical ethics, Vol. 24, No. 2, 06.2013, p. 125-134.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b340928f625342d4a050cd9fc03b4f4a,
title = "Making decisions for Hospitalized older adults: Ethical factors considered by family surrogates",
abstract = "Background: Hospitalized older adults frequently have impaired cognition and must rely on surrogates to make major medical decisions. Ethical standards for surrogate decision making are well delineated, but little is known about what factors surrogates actually consider when making decisions. Objectives: To determine factors surrogate decision makers consider when making major medical decisions for hospitalized older adults, and whether or not they adhere to established ethical standards. Design: Semi-structured interview study of the experience and process of decision making. Setting: A public safety-net hospital and a tertiary referral hospital in a large city in the Midwest United States. Participants: The study Included 35 surrogates with a recent decision-making experience for an inpatient aged 65 or older. Measurements: The key factors that surrogates considered when making decisions. Interview transcripts were coded and analyzed using the grounded theory method of qualitative analysis. Results: Surrogates considered patient-centered factors and surrogate-centered factors. Patient-centered factors included: (1) respecting the patient's input, (2) using past knowledge of the patient to infer the patient's wishes, and (3) considering what is in the patient's best interests. Some surrogates expressed a desire for more information about the patient's prior wishes. Surrogate-centered factors included: (1) surrogate's wishes as a guide, (2) surrogate's religious beliefs and/or spirituality, (3) surrogate's interests, and (4) family consensus. Conclusion Our study indicates that surrogate decision making is more complex than the standard ethical models, which are limited to considerations of the patient's autonomy and beneficence. Because surrogates also imagine what they would want under the circumstances and consider their own needs and preferences, models of surrogate decision making must account for these additional considerations. Surrogates' desire for more information about patients' preferences suggests a need for greater advance care planning.",
author = "Jenna Fritsch and Sandra Petronio and Paul Helft and Alexia Torke",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "125--134",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Ethics",
issn = "1046-7890",
publisher = "Journal of Clinical Ethics",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Making decisions for Hospitalized older adults

T2 - Ethical factors considered by family surrogates

AU - Fritsch, Jenna

AU - Petronio, Sandra

AU - Helft, Paul

AU - Torke, Alexia

PY - 2013/6

Y1 - 2013/6

N2 - Background: Hospitalized older adults frequently have impaired cognition and must rely on surrogates to make major medical decisions. Ethical standards for surrogate decision making are well delineated, but little is known about what factors surrogates actually consider when making decisions. Objectives: To determine factors surrogate decision makers consider when making major medical decisions for hospitalized older adults, and whether or not they adhere to established ethical standards. Design: Semi-structured interview study of the experience and process of decision making. Setting: A public safety-net hospital and a tertiary referral hospital in a large city in the Midwest United States. Participants: The study Included 35 surrogates with a recent decision-making experience for an inpatient aged 65 or older. Measurements: The key factors that surrogates considered when making decisions. Interview transcripts were coded and analyzed using the grounded theory method of qualitative analysis. Results: Surrogates considered patient-centered factors and surrogate-centered factors. Patient-centered factors included: (1) respecting the patient's input, (2) using past knowledge of the patient to infer the patient's wishes, and (3) considering what is in the patient's best interests. Some surrogates expressed a desire for more information about the patient's prior wishes. Surrogate-centered factors included: (1) surrogate's wishes as a guide, (2) surrogate's religious beliefs and/or spirituality, (3) surrogate's interests, and (4) family consensus. Conclusion Our study indicates that surrogate decision making is more complex than the standard ethical models, which are limited to considerations of the patient's autonomy and beneficence. Because surrogates also imagine what they would want under the circumstances and consider their own needs and preferences, models of surrogate decision making must account for these additional considerations. Surrogates' desire for more information about patients' preferences suggests a need for greater advance care planning.

AB - Background: Hospitalized older adults frequently have impaired cognition and must rely on surrogates to make major medical decisions. Ethical standards for surrogate decision making are well delineated, but little is known about what factors surrogates actually consider when making decisions. Objectives: To determine factors surrogate decision makers consider when making major medical decisions for hospitalized older adults, and whether or not they adhere to established ethical standards. Design: Semi-structured interview study of the experience and process of decision making. Setting: A public safety-net hospital and a tertiary referral hospital in a large city in the Midwest United States. Participants: The study Included 35 surrogates with a recent decision-making experience for an inpatient aged 65 or older. Measurements: The key factors that surrogates considered when making decisions. Interview transcripts were coded and analyzed using the grounded theory method of qualitative analysis. Results: Surrogates considered patient-centered factors and surrogate-centered factors. Patient-centered factors included: (1) respecting the patient's input, (2) using past knowledge of the patient to infer the patient's wishes, and (3) considering what is in the patient's best interests. Some surrogates expressed a desire for more information about the patient's prior wishes. Surrogate-centered factors included: (1) surrogate's wishes as a guide, (2) surrogate's religious beliefs and/or spirituality, (3) surrogate's interests, and (4) family consensus. Conclusion Our study indicates that surrogate decision making is more complex than the standard ethical models, which are limited to considerations of the patient's autonomy and beneficence. Because surrogates also imagine what they would want under the circumstances and consider their own needs and preferences, models of surrogate decision making must account for these additional considerations. Surrogates' desire for more information about patients' preferences suggests a need for greater advance care planning.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880421145&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880421145&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 125

EP - 134

JO - Journal of Clinical Ethics

JF - Journal of Clinical Ethics

SN - 1046-7890

IS - 2

ER -