Maximizing retention in community-based clinical trials

Linda Lindsey Davis, Marion E. Broome, Ruth P. Cox

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

71 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To identify and discuss retention strategies and their effectiveness in community-based clinical trials in the last decade. Methods: Online and hand searches for reports for the period 1990-1999. A total of 87 reports on 64 different trials were found; 21 of these published reports included a description of both retention strategies and outcomes. These studies, rank-ordered on participant retention, were compared. Findings: Despite differences in study populations, interventions, and endpoints, community-based trials with the highest retention rates included a combination of retention strategies. Conclusions: As more funding agencies emphasize clinical trials, more investigators will be held accountable for credible and generalizable findings based on retaining the projected number of study participants. The small number of published reports for the decade that identified both retention strategies and outcomes substantiates the need to better document these factors in future research reports.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)47-53
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Nursing Scholarship
Volume34
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Clinical Trials
Research Personnel
Population

Keywords

  • Clinical trials
  • Community-based
  • Retention

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Davis, L. L., Broome, M. E., & Cox, R. P. (2002). Maximizing retention in community-based clinical trials. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 34(1), 47-53.

Maximizing retention in community-based clinical trials. / Davis, Linda Lindsey; Broome, Marion E.; Cox, Ruth P.

In: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2002, p. 47-53.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Davis, LL, Broome, ME & Cox, RP 2002, 'Maximizing retention in community-based clinical trials', Journal of Nursing Scholarship, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 47-53.
Davis, Linda Lindsey ; Broome, Marion E. ; Cox, Ruth P. / Maximizing retention in community-based clinical trials. In: Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 2002 ; Vol. 34, No. 1. pp. 47-53.
@article{120cbba432864e25957334e22cb815a8,
title = "Maximizing retention in community-based clinical trials",
abstract = "Purpose: To identify and discuss retention strategies and their effectiveness in community-based clinical trials in the last decade. Methods: Online and hand searches for reports for the period 1990-1999. A total of 87 reports on 64 different trials were found; 21 of these published reports included a description of both retention strategies and outcomes. These studies, rank-ordered on participant retention, were compared. Findings: Despite differences in study populations, interventions, and endpoints, community-based trials with the highest retention rates included a combination of retention strategies. Conclusions: As more funding agencies emphasize clinical trials, more investigators will be held accountable for credible and generalizable findings based on retaining the projected number of study participants. The small number of published reports for the decade that identified both retention strategies and outcomes substantiates the need to better document these factors in future research reports.",
keywords = "Clinical trials, Community-based, Retention",
author = "Davis, {Linda Lindsey} and Broome, {Marion E.} and Cox, {Ruth P.}",
year = "2002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "47--53",
journal = "Journal of Nursing Scholarship",
issn = "1527-6546",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Maximizing retention in community-based clinical trials

AU - Davis, Linda Lindsey

AU - Broome, Marion E.

AU - Cox, Ruth P.

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Purpose: To identify and discuss retention strategies and their effectiveness in community-based clinical trials in the last decade. Methods: Online and hand searches for reports for the period 1990-1999. A total of 87 reports on 64 different trials were found; 21 of these published reports included a description of both retention strategies and outcomes. These studies, rank-ordered on participant retention, were compared. Findings: Despite differences in study populations, interventions, and endpoints, community-based trials with the highest retention rates included a combination of retention strategies. Conclusions: As more funding agencies emphasize clinical trials, more investigators will be held accountable for credible and generalizable findings based on retaining the projected number of study participants. The small number of published reports for the decade that identified both retention strategies and outcomes substantiates the need to better document these factors in future research reports.

AB - Purpose: To identify and discuss retention strategies and their effectiveness in community-based clinical trials in the last decade. Methods: Online and hand searches for reports for the period 1990-1999. A total of 87 reports on 64 different trials were found; 21 of these published reports included a description of both retention strategies and outcomes. These studies, rank-ordered on participant retention, were compared. Findings: Despite differences in study populations, interventions, and endpoints, community-based trials with the highest retention rates included a combination of retention strategies. Conclusions: As more funding agencies emphasize clinical trials, more investigators will be held accountable for credible and generalizable findings based on retaining the projected number of study participants. The small number of published reports for the decade that identified both retention strategies and outcomes substantiates the need to better document these factors in future research reports.

KW - Clinical trials

KW - Community-based

KW - Retention

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036371393&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036371393&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11901967

AN - SCOPUS:0036371393

VL - 34

SP - 47

EP - 53

JO - Journal of Nursing Scholarship

JF - Journal of Nursing Scholarship

SN - 1527-6546

IS - 1

ER -