Meanings assigned by undergraduates to frequency statements of condom use

Heather Cecil, Gregory Zimet

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Studies of condom use must rely upon self-report data which may not be reliable and valid. This investigation examined how 192 undergraduates (17- 48 years) interpret response categories (never, rarely, sometimes, most of the time, always) used in some surveys to assess frequency of condom use. Subjects completed a questionnaire that described a scenario of a couple who had engaged in sexual intercourse 20 times during the past 3 months. As part of the survey, there were 21 statements in which the stated number of times condoms were used varied from 0 to 20 (e.g., condoms were used 18 out of the 20 episodes of sexual intercourse). For each statement, subjects were instructed to circle the category they believed best matched the frequency with which condoms had been used: 31% indicated that using condoms 1 out of 20 times was an example of never using condoms; similarly, 23% indicated that using condoms 2 times out of the 20 encounters was an example of never using condoms, 40% indicated that condom use for 19 out of 20 encounters was always using condoms, whereas 23% applied the always label to condom use for 18 out of 20 encounters. These results generally support the validity of this type of condom use measurement, but suggest that caution is needed in interpretation. Implications of these findings are discussed with respect to health messages and research methodology.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)493-505
Number of pages13
JournalArchives of Sexual Behavior
Volume27
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 1998

Fingerprint

Condoms
Coitus
Undergraduate
Sexual
Self Report
Research Design

Keywords

  • Condoms
  • Measurement
  • Self-report
  • Verbal meaning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Meanings assigned by undergraduates to frequency statements of condom use. / Cecil, Heather; Zimet, Gregory.

In: Archives of Sexual Behavior, Vol. 27, No. 5, 1998, p. 493-505.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9541e42cf1474a6d8d5722a1aeeeba18,
title = "Meanings assigned by undergraduates to frequency statements of condom use",
abstract = "Studies of condom use must rely upon self-report data which may not be reliable and valid. This investigation examined how 192 undergraduates (17- 48 years) interpret response categories (never, rarely, sometimes, most of the time, always) used in some surveys to assess frequency of condom use. Subjects completed a questionnaire that described a scenario of a couple who had engaged in sexual intercourse 20 times during the past 3 months. As part of the survey, there were 21 statements in which the stated number of times condoms were used varied from 0 to 20 (e.g., condoms were used 18 out of the 20 episodes of sexual intercourse). For each statement, subjects were instructed to circle the category they believed best matched the frequency with which condoms had been used: 31{\%} indicated that using condoms 1 out of 20 times was an example of never using condoms; similarly, 23{\%} indicated that using condoms 2 times out of the 20 encounters was an example of never using condoms, 40{\%} indicated that condom use for 19 out of 20 encounters was always using condoms, whereas 23{\%} applied the always label to condom use for 18 out of 20 encounters. These results generally support the validity of this type of condom use measurement, but suggest that caution is needed in interpretation. Implications of these findings are discussed with respect to health messages and research methodology.",
keywords = "Condoms, Measurement, Self-report, Verbal meaning",
author = "Heather Cecil and Gregory Zimet",
year = "1998",
doi = "10.1023/A:1018756614107",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "493--505",
journal = "Archives of Sexual Behavior",
issn = "0004-0002",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Meanings assigned by undergraduates to frequency statements of condom use

AU - Cecil, Heather

AU - Zimet, Gregory

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - Studies of condom use must rely upon self-report data which may not be reliable and valid. This investigation examined how 192 undergraduates (17- 48 years) interpret response categories (never, rarely, sometimes, most of the time, always) used in some surveys to assess frequency of condom use. Subjects completed a questionnaire that described a scenario of a couple who had engaged in sexual intercourse 20 times during the past 3 months. As part of the survey, there were 21 statements in which the stated number of times condoms were used varied from 0 to 20 (e.g., condoms were used 18 out of the 20 episodes of sexual intercourse). For each statement, subjects were instructed to circle the category they believed best matched the frequency with which condoms had been used: 31% indicated that using condoms 1 out of 20 times was an example of never using condoms; similarly, 23% indicated that using condoms 2 times out of the 20 encounters was an example of never using condoms, 40% indicated that condom use for 19 out of 20 encounters was always using condoms, whereas 23% applied the always label to condom use for 18 out of 20 encounters. These results generally support the validity of this type of condom use measurement, but suggest that caution is needed in interpretation. Implications of these findings are discussed with respect to health messages and research methodology.

AB - Studies of condom use must rely upon self-report data which may not be reliable and valid. This investigation examined how 192 undergraduates (17- 48 years) interpret response categories (never, rarely, sometimes, most of the time, always) used in some surveys to assess frequency of condom use. Subjects completed a questionnaire that described a scenario of a couple who had engaged in sexual intercourse 20 times during the past 3 months. As part of the survey, there were 21 statements in which the stated number of times condoms were used varied from 0 to 20 (e.g., condoms were used 18 out of the 20 episodes of sexual intercourse). For each statement, subjects were instructed to circle the category they believed best matched the frequency with which condoms had been used: 31% indicated that using condoms 1 out of 20 times was an example of never using condoms; similarly, 23% indicated that using condoms 2 times out of the 20 encounters was an example of never using condoms, 40% indicated that condom use for 19 out of 20 encounters was always using condoms, whereas 23% applied the always label to condom use for 18 out of 20 encounters. These results generally support the validity of this type of condom use measurement, but suggest that caution is needed in interpretation. Implications of these findings are discussed with respect to health messages and research methodology.

KW - Condoms

KW - Measurement

KW - Self-report

KW - Verbal meaning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031666948&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031666948&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1023/A:1018756614107

DO - 10.1023/A:1018756614107

M3 - Article

C2 - 9795729

AN - SCOPUS:0031666948

VL - 27

SP - 493

EP - 505

JO - Archives of Sexual Behavior

JF - Archives of Sexual Behavior

SN - 0004-0002

IS - 5

ER -