Measurements from conventional, digital and CT-derived cephalograms: a comparative study.

Ahmed Ghoneima, Sahar Albarakati, Asli Baysal, Tancan Uysal, Katherine Kula

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this retrospective radiographic study was to determine the reliability and reproducibility of skeletal and dental measurements of lateral cephalograms created from a computerised tomography (CT) scan compared with conventional and digital lateral cephalograms. CT and conventional lateral cephalograms of the same patients were obtained from university archives. The lateral cephalometric radiographs of 30 patients were manually traced. The radiographs were subsequently scanned and traced using Dolphin Imaging software version 11 (Dolphin Imaging, Chatsworth, CA, USA). The CT-created lateral cephalograms were also traced using the same software. Sixteen (10 angular and 6 linear) measurements were performed. Cephalometric measurements obtained from conventional, digital and CT-created cephalograms were statistically compared using repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). Statistical significance was set at the p <0.05 level of confidence. The intra-rater reliability test for each method showed high values (r > 0.90) except for mandibular length which had a correlation of 0.82 for the CT-created cephalogram. Five measurements (N-A-Pog, N-S, ANS-PNS, Co-ANS and CoGn) were found to be significantly different between the CT-created and conventional cephalograms and three measurements (SNB, ANB, and/1-MP) were found to be significantly different between the CT-created and digital cephalograms. There are statistically-significant differences in measurements produced using a traditional manual analysis, a direct digital analysis or a 3D CT-derived cephalometric analysis of orthodontic patients. These differences are, on average, small but because of individual variation, may be of considerable clinical significance in some patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)232-239
Number of pages8
JournalAustralian orthodontic journal
Volume28
Issue number2
StatePublished - Nov 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Tomography
Cephalometry
Dolphins
Software
Orthodontics
Analysis of Variance
Tooth
Retrospective Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthodontics

Cite this

Ghoneima, A., Albarakati, S., Baysal, A., Uysal, T., & Kula, K. (2012). Measurements from conventional, digital and CT-derived cephalograms: a comparative study. Australian orthodontic journal, 28(2), 232-239.

Measurements from conventional, digital and CT-derived cephalograms : a comparative study. / Ghoneima, Ahmed; Albarakati, Sahar; Baysal, Asli; Uysal, Tancan; Kula, Katherine.

In: Australian orthodontic journal, Vol. 28, No. 2, 11.2012, p. 232-239.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ghoneima, A, Albarakati, S, Baysal, A, Uysal, T & Kula, K 2012, 'Measurements from conventional, digital and CT-derived cephalograms: a comparative study.', Australian orthodontic journal, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 232-239.
Ghoneima, Ahmed ; Albarakati, Sahar ; Baysal, Asli ; Uysal, Tancan ; Kula, Katherine. / Measurements from conventional, digital and CT-derived cephalograms : a comparative study. In: Australian orthodontic journal. 2012 ; Vol. 28, No. 2. pp. 232-239.
@article{f314cc4db72f43d1bdb71585025cae17,
title = "Measurements from conventional, digital and CT-derived cephalograms: a comparative study.",
abstract = "The purpose of this retrospective radiographic study was to determine the reliability and reproducibility of skeletal and dental measurements of lateral cephalograms created from a computerised tomography (CT) scan compared with conventional and digital lateral cephalograms. CT and conventional lateral cephalograms of the same patients were obtained from university archives. The lateral cephalometric radiographs of 30 patients were manually traced. The radiographs were subsequently scanned and traced using Dolphin Imaging software version 11 (Dolphin Imaging, Chatsworth, CA, USA). The CT-created lateral cephalograms were also traced using the same software. Sixteen (10 angular and 6 linear) measurements were performed. Cephalometric measurements obtained from conventional, digital and CT-created cephalograms were statistically compared using repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). Statistical significance was set at the p <0.05 level of confidence. The intra-rater reliability test for each method showed high values (r > 0.90) except for mandibular length which had a correlation of 0.82 for the CT-created cephalogram. Five measurements (N-A-Pog, N-S, ANS-PNS, Co-ANS and CoGn) were found to be significantly different between the CT-created and conventional cephalograms and three measurements (SNB, ANB, and/1-MP) were found to be significantly different between the CT-created and digital cephalograms. There are statistically-significant differences in measurements produced using a traditional manual analysis, a direct digital analysis or a 3D CT-derived cephalometric analysis of orthodontic patients. These differences are, on average, small but because of individual variation, may be of considerable clinical significance in some patients.",
author = "Ahmed Ghoneima and Sahar Albarakati and Asli Baysal and Tancan Uysal and Katherine Kula",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "232--239",
journal = "Australian orthodontic journal",
issn = "0587-3908",
publisher = "Australian Society of Orthodontists",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measurements from conventional, digital and CT-derived cephalograms

T2 - a comparative study.

AU - Ghoneima, Ahmed

AU - Albarakati, Sahar

AU - Baysal, Asli

AU - Uysal, Tancan

AU - Kula, Katherine

PY - 2012/11

Y1 - 2012/11

N2 - The purpose of this retrospective radiographic study was to determine the reliability and reproducibility of skeletal and dental measurements of lateral cephalograms created from a computerised tomography (CT) scan compared with conventional and digital lateral cephalograms. CT and conventional lateral cephalograms of the same patients were obtained from university archives. The lateral cephalometric radiographs of 30 patients were manually traced. The radiographs were subsequently scanned and traced using Dolphin Imaging software version 11 (Dolphin Imaging, Chatsworth, CA, USA). The CT-created lateral cephalograms were also traced using the same software. Sixteen (10 angular and 6 linear) measurements were performed. Cephalometric measurements obtained from conventional, digital and CT-created cephalograms were statistically compared using repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). Statistical significance was set at the p <0.05 level of confidence. The intra-rater reliability test for each method showed high values (r > 0.90) except for mandibular length which had a correlation of 0.82 for the CT-created cephalogram. Five measurements (N-A-Pog, N-S, ANS-PNS, Co-ANS and CoGn) were found to be significantly different between the CT-created and conventional cephalograms and three measurements (SNB, ANB, and/1-MP) were found to be significantly different between the CT-created and digital cephalograms. There are statistically-significant differences in measurements produced using a traditional manual analysis, a direct digital analysis or a 3D CT-derived cephalometric analysis of orthodontic patients. These differences are, on average, small but because of individual variation, may be of considerable clinical significance in some patients.

AB - The purpose of this retrospective radiographic study was to determine the reliability and reproducibility of skeletal and dental measurements of lateral cephalograms created from a computerised tomography (CT) scan compared with conventional and digital lateral cephalograms. CT and conventional lateral cephalograms of the same patients were obtained from university archives. The lateral cephalometric radiographs of 30 patients were manually traced. The radiographs were subsequently scanned and traced using Dolphin Imaging software version 11 (Dolphin Imaging, Chatsworth, CA, USA). The CT-created lateral cephalograms were also traced using the same software. Sixteen (10 angular and 6 linear) measurements were performed. Cephalometric measurements obtained from conventional, digital and CT-created cephalograms were statistically compared using repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). Statistical significance was set at the p <0.05 level of confidence. The intra-rater reliability test for each method showed high values (r > 0.90) except for mandibular length which had a correlation of 0.82 for the CT-created cephalogram. Five measurements (N-A-Pog, N-S, ANS-PNS, Co-ANS and CoGn) were found to be significantly different between the CT-created and conventional cephalograms and three measurements (SNB, ANB, and/1-MP) were found to be significantly different between the CT-created and digital cephalograms. There are statistically-significant differences in measurements produced using a traditional manual analysis, a direct digital analysis or a 3D CT-derived cephalometric analysis of orthodontic patients. These differences are, on average, small but because of individual variation, may be of considerable clinical significance in some patients.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873532421&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873532421&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 23304973

AN - SCOPUS:84873532421

VL - 28

SP - 232

EP - 239

JO - Australian orthodontic journal

JF - Australian orthodontic journal

SN - 0587-3908

IS - 2

ER -