Medical ethics under managed care

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

"Managed Care" is having a profound effect on medical ethics and the patient/physician relationship. Historically, the patient (the first party) contracted with a physician (the second party) to provide medical care. The physician had ethical and legal obligations to the patient. In the "new health care" an employer or the government (the fourth party) or infrequently, the patient (the first party) purchases health care from the HMO, PPO, or similar organization (the third party). The third party then contracts with the physician (the second party) to provide that care. The physician has agreed to two, at times competing and possibly immutably conflicting obligations-one to the patient and one to the third party. The ethical and legal problems that arise from conflict between "the bottom line" and "desired" (appropriate) health care will be difficult to solve. The incompatible duality of physician roles both as patient advocate and manager of limited resources will be further explored, with attention to the enormous pressure being applied to this conflict by society, the law, and the third party. Potential resolutions will be offered. Other ethical problems created by the health care system's conversion to managed care include: CONFIDENTIALITYInformation management is a fundamental underpinning of managed care. With patients switching health care programs frequently, and their enormous size and complexity, careful attention to confidentiality is necessary. INFORMED CONSENT-In addition to informed consent relative to the health care being offered, the patient has a right to know what alternatives might be offered independent of her insurance and payment plan. The patient also has a right to know the economic pressures and arrangements between the second and third parties that could influence the quantity and quality of her health care. QUALITY OF CARE-Managed care contends to be religiously attentive to quality of care. If this is so, the very definition of quality of care may be changing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)124-128
Number of pages5
JournalInternational Journal of Fertility and Menopausal Studies
Volume41
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Medical Ethics
Managed Care Programs
Delivery of Health Care
Quality of Health Care
Physicians
Pressure
Physician-Patient Relations
Physician's Role
Health Maintenance Organizations
Confidentiality
Jurisprudence
Insurance
Informed Consent
Economics
Organizations

Keywords

  • Managed care
  • Medical ethics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Medical ethics under managed care. / Schwartz, Peter.

In: International Journal of Fertility and Menopausal Studies, Vol. 41, No. 2, 1996, p. 124-128.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d3c98135fee741368bcb884e0cfbd3f0,
title = "Medical ethics under managed care",
abstract = "{"}Managed Care{"} is having a profound effect on medical ethics and the patient/physician relationship. Historically, the patient (the first party) contracted with a physician (the second party) to provide medical care. The physician had ethical and legal obligations to the patient. In the {"}new health care{"} an employer or the government (the fourth party) or infrequently, the patient (the first party) purchases health care from the HMO, PPO, or similar organization (the third party). The third party then contracts with the physician (the second party) to provide that care. The physician has agreed to two, at times competing and possibly immutably conflicting obligations-one to the patient and one to the third party. The ethical and legal problems that arise from conflict between {"}the bottom line{"} and {"}desired{"} (appropriate) health care will be difficult to solve. The incompatible duality of physician roles both as patient advocate and manager of limited resources will be further explored, with attention to the enormous pressure being applied to this conflict by society, the law, and the third party. Potential resolutions will be offered. Other ethical problems created by the health care system's conversion to managed care include: CONFIDENTIALITYInformation management is a fundamental underpinning of managed care. With patients switching health care programs frequently, and their enormous size and complexity, careful attention to confidentiality is necessary. INFORMED CONSENT-In addition to informed consent relative to the health care being offered, the patient has a right to know what alternatives might be offered independent of her insurance and payment plan. The patient also has a right to know the economic pressures and arrangements between the second and third parties that could influence the quantity and quality of her health care. QUALITY OF CARE-Managed care contends to be religiously attentive to quality of care. If this is so, the very definition of quality of care may be changing.",
keywords = "Managed care, Medical ethics",
author = "Peter Schwartz",
year = "1996",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "124--128",
journal = "International Journal of Fertility and Menopausal Studies",
issn = "1069-3130",
publisher = "M S P International, Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Medical ethics under managed care

AU - Schwartz, Peter

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - "Managed Care" is having a profound effect on medical ethics and the patient/physician relationship. Historically, the patient (the first party) contracted with a physician (the second party) to provide medical care. The physician had ethical and legal obligations to the patient. In the "new health care" an employer or the government (the fourth party) or infrequently, the patient (the first party) purchases health care from the HMO, PPO, or similar organization (the third party). The third party then contracts with the physician (the second party) to provide that care. The physician has agreed to two, at times competing and possibly immutably conflicting obligations-one to the patient and one to the third party. The ethical and legal problems that arise from conflict between "the bottom line" and "desired" (appropriate) health care will be difficult to solve. The incompatible duality of physician roles both as patient advocate and manager of limited resources will be further explored, with attention to the enormous pressure being applied to this conflict by society, the law, and the third party. Potential resolutions will be offered. Other ethical problems created by the health care system's conversion to managed care include: CONFIDENTIALITYInformation management is a fundamental underpinning of managed care. With patients switching health care programs frequently, and their enormous size and complexity, careful attention to confidentiality is necessary. INFORMED CONSENT-In addition to informed consent relative to the health care being offered, the patient has a right to know what alternatives might be offered independent of her insurance and payment plan. The patient also has a right to know the economic pressures and arrangements between the second and third parties that could influence the quantity and quality of her health care. QUALITY OF CARE-Managed care contends to be religiously attentive to quality of care. If this is so, the very definition of quality of care may be changing.

AB - "Managed Care" is having a profound effect on medical ethics and the patient/physician relationship. Historically, the patient (the first party) contracted with a physician (the second party) to provide medical care. The physician had ethical and legal obligations to the patient. In the "new health care" an employer or the government (the fourth party) or infrequently, the patient (the first party) purchases health care from the HMO, PPO, or similar organization (the third party). The third party then contracts with the physician (the second party) to provide that care. The physician has agreed to two, at times competing and possibly immutably conflicting obligations-one to the patient and one to the third party. The ethical and legal problems that arise from conflict between "the bottom line" and "desired" (appropriate) health care will be difficult to solve. The incompatible duality of physician roles both as patient advocate and manager of limited resources will be further explored, with attention to the enormous pressure being applied to this conflict by society, the law, and the third party. Potential resolutions will be offered. Other ethical problems created by the health care system's conversion to managed care include: CONFIDENTIALITYInformation management is a fundamental underpinning of managed care. With patients switching health care programs frequently, and their enormous size and complexity, careful attention to confidentiality is necessary. INFORMED CONSENT-In addition to informed consent relative to the health care being offered, the patient has a right to know what alternatives might be offered independent of her insurance and payment plan. The patient also has a right to know the economic pressures and arrangements between the second and third parties that could influence the quantity and quality of her health care. QUALITY OF CARE-Managed care contends to be religiously attentive to quality of care. If this is so, the very definition of quality of care may be changing.

KW - Managed care

KW - Medical ethics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029666202&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029666202&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8829689

AN - SCOPUS:0029666202

VL - 41

SP - 124

EP - 128

JO - International Journal of Fertility and Menopausal Studies

JF - International Journal of Fertility and Menopausal Studies

SN - 1069-3130

IS - 2

ER -