Medical Homes for Children With Special Health Care Needs: Primary Care or Subspecialty Service?

Jeanne Van Cleave, Megumi J. Okumura, Nancy Swigonski, Karen G. O'Connor, Marie Mann, Jennifer L. Lail

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To examine primary care pediatricians' (PCPs) beliefs about whether the family-centered medical home (FCMH) should be in primary or subspecialty care for children with different degrees of complexity; and to examine practice characteristics associated with these beliefs. Methods: Data from the American Academy of Pediatrics Periodic Survey (PS 79) conducted in 2012 were analyzed. Outcomes were agreement/strong agreement that 1) primary care should be the FCMH locus for most children with special health care needs (CSHCN) and 2) subspecialty care is the best FCMH locus for children with rare or complex conditions. In multivariate models, we tested associations between outcomes and practice barriers (eg, work culture, time, cost) and facilitators (eg, having a care coordinator) to FCMH implementation. Results: Among 572 PCPs, 65% agreed/strongly agreed primary care is the best FCMH setting for most CSHCN, and 43% agreed/strongly agreed subspecialty care is the best setting for children with complexity. Cost and time as barriers to FCMH implementation were oppositely associated with the belief that primary care was best for most CSHCN (cost: adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 2.31, 1.36-3.90; time: AOR 0.48, 0.29-0.81). Lack of skills to communicate and coordinate care was associated with the belief that specialty care was the best FCMH for children with complexity (AOR 1.99, 1.05-3.79). Conclusions: A substantial minority endorsed specialty care as the best FCMH locus for children with medical complexity. Several barriers were associated with believing primary care to be the best FCMH for most CSHCN. Addressing medical complexity in FCMH implementation may enhance perceived value by pediatricians.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAcademic Pediatrics
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Aug 25 2015

Fingerprint

Patient-Centered Care
Primary Health Care
Delivery of Health Care
Odds Ratio
Costs and Cost Analysis
Child Care
Health Care Costs
Pediatrics

Keywords

  • Children with special health care needs
  • Medical home
  • Primary care
  • Subspecialty care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Medical Homes for Children With Special Health Care Needs : Primary Care or Subspecialty Service? / Van Cleave, Jeanne; Okumura, Megumi J.; Swigonski, Nancy; O'Connor, Karen G.; Mann, Marie; Lail, Jennifer L.

In: Academic Pediatrics, 25.08.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Van Cleave, Jeanne ; Okumura, Megumi J. ; Swigonski, Nancy ; O'Connor, Karen G. ; Mann, Marie ; Lail, Jennifer L. / Medical Homes for Children With Special Health Care Needs : Primary Care or Subspecialty Service?. In: Academic Pediatrics. 2015.
@article{5b8170741d6f4c43ba3e2fec434b72ce,
title = "Medical Homes for Children With Special Health Care Needs: Primary Care or Subspecialty Service?",
abstract = "Objective: To examine primary care pediatricians' (PCPs) beliefs about whether the family-centered medical home (FCMH) should be in primary or subspecialty care for children with different degrees of complexity; and to examine practice characteristics associated with these beliefs. Methods: Data from the American Academy of Pediatrics Periodic Survey (PS 79) conducted in 2012 were analyzed. Outcomes were agreement/strong agreement that 1) primary care should be the FCMH locus for most children with special health care needs (CSHCN) and 2) subspecialty care is the best FCMH locus for children with rare or complex conditions. In multivariate models, we tested associations between outcomes and practice barriers (eg, work culture, time, cost) and facilitators (eg, having a care coordinator) to FCMH implementation. Results: Among 572 PCPs, 65{\%} agreed/strongly agreed primary care is the best FCMH setting for most CSHCN, and 43{\%} agreed/strongly agreed subspecialty care is the best setting for children with complexity. Cost and time as barriers to FCMH implementation were oppositely associated with the belief that primary care was best for most CSHCN (cost: adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 2.31, 1.36-3.90; time: AOR 0.48, 0.29-0.81). Lack of skills to communicate and coordinate care was associated with the belief that specialty care was the best FCMH for children with complexity (AOR 1.99, 1.05-3.79). Conclusions: A substantial minority endorsed specialty care as the best FCMH locus for children with medical complexity. Several barriers were associated with believing primary care to be the best FCMH for most CSHCN. Addressing medical complexity in FCMH implementation may enhance perceived value by pediatricians.",
keywords = "Children with special health care needs, Medical home, Primary care, Subspecialty care",
author = "{Van Cleave}, Jeanne and Okumura, {Megumi J.} and Nancy Swigonski and O'Connor, {Karen G.} and Marie Mann and Lail, {Jennifer L.}",
year = "2015",
month = "8",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1016/j.acap.2015.10.009",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Academic Pediatrics",
issn = "1876-2859",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Medical Homes for Children With Special Health Care Needs

T2 - Primary Care or Subspecialty Service?

AU - Van Cleave, Jeanne

AU - Okumura, Megumi J.

AU - Swigonski, Nancy

AU - O'Connor, Karen G.

AU - Mann, Marie

AU - Lail, Jennifer L.

PY - 2015/8/25

Y1 - 2015/8/25

N2 - Objective: To examine primary care pediatricians' (PCPs) beliefs about whether the family-centered medical home (FCMH) should be in primary or subspecialty care for children with different degrees of complexity; and to examine practice characteristics associated with these beliefs. Methods: Data from the American Academy of Pediatrics Periodic Survey (PS 79) conducted in 2012 were analyzed. Outcomes were agreement/strong agreement that 1) primary care should be the FCMH locus for most children with special health care needs (CSHCN) and 2) subspecialty care is the best FCMH locus for children with rare or complex conditions. In multivariate models, we tested associations between outcomes and practice barriers (eg, work culture, time, cost) and facilitators (eg, having a care coordinator) to FCMH implementation. Results: Among 572 PCPs, 65% agreed/strongly agreed primary care is the best FCMH setting for most CSHCN, and 43% agreed/strongly agreed subspecialty care is the best setting for children with complexity. Cost and time as barriers to FCMH implementation were oppositely associated with the belief that primary care was best for most CSHCN (cost: adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 2.31, 1.36-3.90; time: AOR 0.48, 0.29-0.81). Lack of skills to communicate and coordinate care was associated with the belief that specialty care was the best FCMH for children with complexity (AOR 1.99, 1.05-3.79). Conclusions: A substantial minority endorsed specialty care as the best FCMH locus for children with medical complexity. Several barriers were associated with believing primary care to be the best FCMH for most CSHCN. Addressing medical complexity in FCMH implementation may enhance perceived value by pediatricians.

AB - Objective: To examine primary care pediatricians' (PCPs) beliefs about whether the family-centered medical home (FCMH) should be in primary or subspecialty care for children with different degrees of complexity; and to examine practice characteristics associated with these beliefs. Methods: Data from the American Academy of Pediatrics Periodic Survey (PS 79) conducted in 2012 were analyzed. Outcomes were agreement/strong agreement that 1) primary care should be the FCMH locus for most children with special health care needs (CSHCN) and 2) subspecialty care is the best FCMH locus for children with rare or complex conditions. In multivariate models, we tested associations between outcomes and practice barriers (eg, work culture, time, cost) and facilitators (eg, having a care coordinator) to FCMH implementation. Results: Among 572 PCPs, 65% agreed/strongly agreed primary care is the best FCMH setting for most CSHCN, and 43% agreed/strongly agreed subspecialty care is the best setting for children with complexity. Cost and time as barriers to FCMH implementation were oppositely associated with the belief that primary care was best for most CSHCN (cost: adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 2.31, 1.36-3.90; time: AOR 0.48, 0.29-0.81). Lack of skills to communicate and coordinate care was associated with the belief that specialty care was the best FCMH for children with complexity (AOR 1.99, 1.05-3.79). Conclusions: A substantial minority endorsed specialty care as the best FCMH locus for children with medical complexity. Several barriers were associated with believing primary care to be the best FCMH for most CSHCN. Addressing medical complexity in FCMH implementation may enhance perceived value by pediatricians.

KW - Children with special health care needs

KW - Medical home

KW - Primary care

KW - Subspecialty care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84969322104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84969322104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.acap.2015.10.009

DO - 10.1016/j.acap.2015.10.009

M3 - Article

C2 - 26523634

AN - SCOPUS:84969322104

JO - Academic Pediatrics

JF - Academic Pediatrics

SN - 1876-2859

ER -