Melanoma patients evaluated by four different positron emission tomography reconstruction techniques

D. S. Schauwecker, A. R. Siddiqui, J. D. Wagner, D. Davidson, S. H. Jung, K. A. Carlson, G. D. Hutchins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

One hundred and nineteen patients with malignant melanoma were studied using 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET). The images were reconstructed using ordered subset expectation maximization with and without attenuation correction and filtered backprojection with and without attenuation correction. The most probable draining lymph node chains were surgically explored and the tumour volume was quantified at histology. The four different reconstructions of the PET images were retrospectively graded on a five-point scale by two blind readers and compared with the tumour volume. The readers agreed within ±1 grade 93% (529/568) of the time. Comparing the areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves gave 0.698, 0.668, 0.694 and 0.684 for the four reconstruction techniques. The lowest P value comparing any pair of the four reconstruction techniques was P = 0.371. Thus, none of the reconstruction techniques gave significantly better results than any of the others. The sensitivity of detection was 85% for tumour volumes of 113 m3 or more (about 6 mm in diameter), but only 4% for tumours less than this size. It can be concluded that the use of attenuation correction gives aesthetically more pleasing images, but the sensitivity and specificity are not significantly improved.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)281-289
Number of pages9
JournalNuclear Medicine Communications
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2003

Fingerprint

Tumor Burden
Positron-Emission Tomography
Melanoma
Computer-Assisted Image Processing
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
ROC Curve
Histology
Lymph Nodes
Sensitivity and Specificity
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Emission CT (ECT)
  • Lymphatic system
  • Melanoma
  • Neoplasms
  • Radionuclide studies
  • Technology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Melanoma patients evaluated by four different positron emission tomography reconstruction techniques. / Schauwecker, D. S.; Siddiqui, A. R.; Wagner, J. D.; Davidson, D.; Jung, S. H.; Carlson, K. A.; Hutchins, G. D.

In: Nuclear Medicine Communications, Vol. 24, No. 3, 03.2003, p. 281-289.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schauwecker, D. S. ; Siddiqui, A. R. ; Wagner, J. D. ; Davidson, D. ; Jung, S. H. ; Carlson, K. A. ; Hutchins, G. D. / Melanoma patients evaluated by four different positron emission tomography reconstruction techniques. In: Nuclear Medicine Communications. 2003 ; Vol. 24, No. 3. pp. 281-289.
@article{190b41e05ec64e92a5ac69292258ddc8,
title = "Melanoma patients evaluated by four different positron emission tomography reconstruction techniques",
abstract = "One hundred and nineteen patients with malignant melanoma were studied using 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET). The images were reconstructed using ordered subset expectation maximization with and without attenuation correction and filtered backprojection with and without attenuation correction. The most probable draining lymph node chains were surgically explored and the tumour volume was quantified at histology. The four different reconstructions of the PET images were retrospectively graded on a five-point scale by two blind readers and compared with the tumour volume. The readers agreed within ±1 grade 93{\%} (529/568) of the time. Comparing the areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves gave 0.698, 0.668, 0.694 and 0.684 for the four reconstruction techniques. The lowest P value comparing any pair of the four reconstruction techniques was P = 0.371. Thus, none of the reconstruction techniques gave significantly better results than any of the others. The sensitivity of detection was 85{\%} for tumour volumes of 113 m3 or more (about 6 mm in diameter), but only 4{\%} for tumours less than this size. It can be concluded that the use of attenuation correction gives aesthetically more pleasing images, but the sensitivity and specificity are not significantly improved.",
keywords = "Emission CT (ECT), Lymphatic system, Melanoma, Neoplasms, Radionuclide studies, Technology",
author = "Schauwecker, {D. S.} and Siddiqui, {A. R.} and Wagner, {J. D.} and D. Davidson and Jung, {S. H.} and Carlson, {K. A.} and Hutchins, {G. D.}",
year = "2003",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1097/00006231-200303000-00008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "281--289",
journal = "Nuclear Medicine Communications",
issn = "0143-3636",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Melanoma patients evaluated by four different positron emission tomography reconstruction techniques

AU - Schauwecker, D. S.

AU - Siddiqui, A. R.

AU - Wagner, J. D.

AU - Davidson, D.

AU - Jung, S. H.

AU - Carlson, K. A.

AU - Hutchins, G. D.

PY - 2003/3

Y1 - 2003/3

N2 - One hundred and nineteen patients with malignant melanoma were studied using 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET). The images were reconstructed using ordered subset expectation maximization with and without attenuation correction and filtered backprojection with and without attenuation correction. The most probable draining lymph node chains were surgically explored and the tumour volume was quantified at histology. The four different reconstructions of the PET images were retrospectively graded on a five-point scale by two blind readers and compared with the tumour volume. The readers agreed within ±1 grade 93% (529/568) of the time. Comparing the areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves gave 0.698, 0.668, 0.694 and 0.684 for the four reconstruction techniques. The lowest P value comparing any pair of the four reconstruction techniques was P = 0.371. Thus, none of the reconstruction techniques gave significantly better results than any of the others. The sensitivity of detection was 85% for tumour volumes of 113 m3 or more (about 6 mm in diameter), but only 4% for tumours less than this size. It can be concluded that the use of attenuation correction gives aesthetically more pleasing images, but the sensitivity and specificity are not significantly improved.

AB - One hundred and nineteen patients with malignant melanoma were studied using 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET). The images were reconstructed using ordered subset expectation maximization with and without attenuation correction and filtered backprojection with and without attenuation correction. The most probable draining lymph node chains were surgically explored and the tumour volume was quantified at histology. The four different reconstructions of the PET images were retrospectively graded on a five-point scale by two blind readers and compared with the tumour volume. The readers agreed within ±1 grade 93% (529/568) of the time. Comparing the areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves gave 0.698, 0.668, 0.694 and 0.684 for the four reconstruction techniques. The lowest P value comparing any pair of the four reconstruction techniques was P = 0.371. Thus, none of the reconstruction techniques gave significantly better results than any of the others. The sensitivity of detection was 85% for tumour volumes of 113 m3 or more (about 6 mm in diameter), but only 4% for tumours less than this size. It can be concluded that the use of attenuation correction gives aesthetically more pleasing images, but the sensitivity and specificity are not significantly improved.

KW - Emission CT (ECT)

KW - Lymphatic system

KW - Melanoma

KW - Neoplasms

KW - Radionuclide studies

KW - Technology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0141542629&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0141542629&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00006231-200303000-00008

DO - 10.1097/00006231-200303000-00008

M3 - Article

C2 - 12612469

AN - SCOPUS:0141542629

VL - 24

SP - 281

EP - 289

JO - Nuclear Medicine Communications

JF - Nuclear Medicine Communications

SN - 0143-3636

IS - 3

ER -