Meta-analysis: Adherence to colorectal cancer screening and the detection rate for advanced neoplasia, according to the type of screening test

C. Hassan, P. Giorgi Rossi, L. Camilloni, D. K. Rex, B. Jimenez-Cendales, E. Ferroni, P. Borgia, A. Zullo, G. Guasticchi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

79 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background A variety of tests have been proposed for colorectal cancer (CRC), giving rise to uncertainty regarding the optimal approach. The efficacy and effectiveness of different tests are related to both screenee participation and the detection rate. Aim To perform a meta-analysis on adherence and detection rates of CRC screening tests. Methods Relevant publications were identified by MEDLINE/EMBASE and other databases for the period 1999-2012. A previous systematic review was used for the period before 1966-1999. RCTs and controlled studies including a direct comparison of the uptake rates among different options for CRC screening were included. Adherence and detection rates for advanced neoplasia and cancer were extracted. Risk for bias was ascertained according to CONSORT guidelines. Forrest plots were produced based on random-effect models. Results Fourteen studies provided data on 197 910 subjects. Endoscopic strategies were associated with a lower participation (RR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.56, 0.80) rate, but a higher detection rate of advanced neoplasia (RR: 3.21, 95% CI: 2.38, 4.32) compared with faecal tests. FIT was superior to g-FOBT with regard to both adherence (RR: 1.16, 95% CI 1.03, 1.30) and detection of advanced neoplasia (RR: 2.28, 95% CI 1.68, 3.10) and cancer (RR: 1.96, 95% CI: 1.2, 3.2). Conclusion The superior accuracy of endoscopy compared with faecal tests minimised any impact of the participation rate in determining the detection rate of advanced neoplasia in a screening setting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)929-940
Number of pages12
JournalAlimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Volume36
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2012

Fingerprint

Early Detection of Cancer
Meta-Analysis
Colorectal Neoplasms
Neoplasms
MEDLINE
Endoscopy
Uncertainty
Publications
Databases
Guidelines

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Cite this

Meta-analysis : Adherence to colorectal cancer screening and the detection rate for advanced neoplasia, according to the type of screening test. / Hassan, C.; Rossi, P. Giorgi; Camilloni, L.; Rex, D. K.; Jimenez-Cendales, B.; Ferroni, E.; Borgia, P.; Zullo, A.; Guasticchi, G.

In: Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Vol. 36, No. 10, 01.11.2012, p. 929-940.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hassan, C, Rossi, PG, Camilloni, L, Rex, DK, Jimenez-Cendales, B, Ferroni, E, Borgia, P, Zullo, A & Guasticchi, G 2012, 'Meta-analysis: Adherence to colorectal cancer screening and the detection rate for advanced neoplasia, according to the type of screening test', Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 929-940. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.12071
Hassan, C. ; Rossi, P. Giorgi ; Camilloni, L. ; Rex, D. K. ; Jimenez-Cendales, B. ; Ferroni, E. ; Borgia, P. ; Zullo, A. ; Guasticchi, G. / Meta-analysis : Adherence to colorectal cancer screening and the detection rate for advanced neoplasia, according to the type of screening test. In: Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 2012 ; Vol. 36, No. 10. pp. 929-940.
@article{9ff8b112147449e6abafce0ef3d9a17c,
title = "Meta-analysis: Adherence to colorectal cancer screening and the detection rate for advanced neoplasia, according to the type of screening test",
abstract = "Background A variety of tests have been proposed for colorectal cancer (CRC), giving rise to uncertainty regarding the optimal approach. The efficacy and effectiveness of different tests are related to both screenee participation and the detection rate. Aim To perform a meta-analysis on adherence and detection rates of CRC screening tests. Methods Relevant publications were identified by MEDLINE/EMBASE and other databases for the period 1999-2012. A previous systematic review was used for the period before 1966-1999. RCTs and controlled studies including a direct comparison of the uptake rates among different options for CRC screening were included. Adherence and detection rates for advanced neoplasia and cancer were extracted. Risk for bias was ascertained according to CONSORT guidelines. Forrest plots were produced based on random-effect models. Results Fourteen studies provided data on 197 910 subjects. Endoscopic strategies were associated with a lower participation (RR: 0.67, 95{\%} CI: 0.56, 0.80) rate, but a higher detection rate of advanced neoplasia (RR: 3.21, 95{\%} CI: 2.38, 4.32) compared with faecal tests. FIT was superior to g-FOBT with regard to both adherence (RR: 1.16, 95{\%} CI 1.03, 1.30) and detection of advanced neoplasia (RR: 2.28, 95{\%} CI 1.68, 3.10) and cancer (RR: 1.96, 95{\%} CI: 1.2, 3.2). Conclusion The superior accuracy of endoscopy compared with faecal tests minimised any impact of the participation rate in determining the detection rate of advanced neoplasia in a screening setting.",
author = "C. Hassan and Rossi, {P. Giorgi} and L. Camilloni and Rex, {D. K.} and B. Jimenez-Cendales and E. Ferroni and P. Borgia and A. Zullo and G. Guasticchi",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/apt.12071",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "929--940",
journal = "Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics",
issn = "0269-2813",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Meta-analysis

T2 - Adherence to colorectal cancer screening and the detection rate for advanced neoplasia, according to the type of screening test

AU - Hassan, C.

AU - Rossi, P. Giorgi

AU - Camilloni, L.

AU - Rex, D. K.

AU - Jimenez-Cendales, B.

AU - Ferroni, E.

AU - Borgia, P.

AU - Zullo, A.

AU - Guasticchi, G.

PY - 2012/11/1

Y1 - 2012/11/1

N2 - Background A variety of tests have been proposed for colorectal cancer (CRC), giving rise to uncertainty regarding the optimal approach. The efficacy and effectiveness of different tests are related to both screenee participation and the detection rate. Aim To perform a meta-analysis on adherence and detection rates of CRC screening tests. Methods Relevant publications were identified by MEDLINE/EMBASE and other databases for the period 1999-2012. A previous systematic review was used for the period before 1966-1999. RCTs and controlled studies including a direct comparison of the uptake rates among different options for CRC screening were included. Adherence and detection rates for advanced neoplasia and cancer were extracted. Risk for bias was ascertained according to CONSORT guidelines. Forrest plots were produced based on random-effect models. Results Fourteen studies provided data on 197 910 subjects. Endoscopic strategies were associated with a lower participation (RR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.56, 0.80) rate, but a higher detection rate of advanced neoplasia (RR: 3.21, 95% CI: 2.38, 4.32) compared with faecal tests. FIT was superior to g-FOBT with regard to both adherence (RR: 1.16, 95% CI 1.03, 1.30) and detection of advanced neoplasia (RR: 2.28, 95% CI 1.68, 3.10) and cancer (RR: 1.96, 95% CI: 1.2, 3.2). Conclusion The superior accuracy of endoscopy compared with faecal tests minimised any impact of the participation rate in determining the detection rate of advanced neoplasia in a screening setting.

AB - Background A variety of tests have been proposed for colorectal cancer (CRC), giving rise to uncertainty regarding the optimal approach. The efficacy and effectiveness of different tests are related to both screenee participation and the detection rate. Aim To perform a meta-analysis on adherence and detection rates of CRC screening tests. Methods Relevant publications were identified by MEDLINE/EMBASE and other databases for the period 1999-2012. A previous systematic review was used for the period before 1966-1999. RCTs and controlled studies including a direct comparison of the uptake rates among different options for CRC screening were included. Adherence and detection rates for advanced neoplasia and cancer were extracted. Risk for bias was ascertained according to CONSORT guidelines. Forrest plots were produced based on random-effect models. Results Fourteen studies provided data on 197 910 subjects. Endoscopic strategies were associated with a lower participation (RR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.56, 0.80) rate, but a higher detection rate of advanced neoplasia (RR: 3.21, 95% CI: 2.38, 4.32) compared with faecal tests. FIT was superior to g-FOBT with regard to both adherence (RR: 1.16, 95% CI 1.03, 1.30) and detection of advanced neoplasia (RR: 2.28, 95% CI 1.68, 3.10) and cancer (RR: 1.96, 95% CI: 1.2, 3.2). Conclusion The superior accuracy of endoscopy compared with faecal tests minimised any impact of the participation rate in determining the detection rate of advanced neoplasia in a screening setting.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867574204&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867574204&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/apt.12071

DO - 10.1111/apt.12071

M3 - Article

C2 - 23035890

AN - SCOPUS:84867574204

VL - 36

SP - 929

EP - 940

JO - Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics

JF - Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics

SN - 0269-2813

IS - 10

ER -