Meta-analysis of vagus nerve stimulation treatment for epilepsy: correlation between device setting parameters and acute response

S. Ghani, Joel Vilensky, B. Turner, R. S. Tubbs, M. Loukas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an adjunctive neurophysiological treatment for those patients who have pharmacoresistant or surgically resistant partial onset epilepsy. Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the effects of high and low stimulation paradigms on a responder rate of ≥50 and ≥75 % reduction in seizure frequency and associated adverse effects in adults and children. Method: A literature search was performed using Medline, PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library for studies using vagus nerve stimulation published from January 1980 until July 2014 for medically or surgically resistant partial onset seizures, in children and adults. No restrictions on languages were imposed. Data collection and analysis: Four authors reviewed and selected studies for inclusion and exclusion. The search identified five randomized control trials that fit with our inclusion criteria. The following outcomes were evaluated: 50 % or greater reduction in total seizure frequency, 75 % or greater reduction in total seizure frequency, and adverse effects. Results: Four randomized controlled trials were analyzed in this meta-analysis. Results indicate high stimulation is more effective in adult patients who experienced ≥50 and ≥75 % reduction in seizure frequency with a significant difference within both high and low stimulation groups. In children, there was no significant difference between the two groups and patients with ≥50 % reduction in seizures. Adverse effects such as hoarseness and dyspnea were more common in the high stimulation group where the remaining side effects were not statistically different among both groups. Conclusion: High stimulation is more effective than low stimulation in producing a greater reduction in seizure frequency in patients with medically and surgically resistant epilepsy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2291-2304
Number of pages14
JournalChild's Nervous System
Volume31
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2015

Fingerprint

Vagus Nerve Stimulation
Meta-Analysis
Epilepsy
Seizures
Equipment and Supplies
Therapeutics
Hoarseness
Partial Epilepsy
PubMed
Dyspnea
Libraries
Language
Randomized Controlled Trials

Keywords

  • Adults
  • Children
  • Epilepsy
  • NCP
  • Vagus nerve stimulation
  • VNS

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Meta-analysis of vagus nerve stimulation treatment for epilepsy : correlation between device setting parameters and acute response. / Ghani, S.; Vilensky, Joel; Turner, B.; Tubbs, R. S.; Loukas, M.

In: Child's Nervous System, Vol. 31, No. 12, 01.12.2015, p. 2291-2304.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{01db9744f45d435896c58f0542bfcf21,
title = "Meta-analysis of vagus nerve stimulation treatment for epilepsy: correlation between device setting parameters and acute response",
abstract = "Background: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an adjunctive neurophysiological treatment for those patients who have pharmacoresistant or surgically resistant partial onset epilepsy. Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the effects of high and low stimulation paradigms on a responder rate of ≥50 and ≥75 {\%} reduction in seizure frequency and associated adverse effects in adults and children. Method: A literature search was performed using Medline, PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library for studies using vagus nerve stimulation published from January 1980 until July 2014 for medically or surgically resistant partial onset seizures, in children and adults. No restrictions on languages were imposed. Data collection and analysis: Four authors reviewed and selected studies for inclusion and exclusion. The search identified five randomized control trials that fit with our inclusion criteria. The following outcomes were evaluated: 50 {\%} or greater reduction in total seizure frequency, 75 {\%} or greater reduction in total seizure frequency, and adverse effects. Results: Four randomized controlled trials were analyzed in this meta-analysis. Results indicate high stimulation is more effective in adult patients who experienced ≥50 and ≥75 {\%} reduction in seizure frequency with a significant difference within both high and low stimulation groups. In children, there was no significant difference between the two groups and patients with ≥50 {\%} reduction in seizures. Adverse effects such as hoarseness and dyspnea were more common in the high stimulation group where the remaining side effects were not statistically different among both groups. Conclusion: High stimulation is more effective than low stimulation in producing a greater reduction in seizure frequency in patients with medically and surgically resistant epilepsy.",
keywords = "Adults, Children, Epilepsy, NCP, Vagus nerve stimulation, VNS",
author = "S. Ghani and Joel Vilensky and B. Turner and Tubbs, {R. S.} and M. Loukas",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00381-015-2921-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "2291--2304",
journal = "Child's Nervous System",
issn = "0256-7040",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Meta-analysis of vagus nerve stimulation treatment for epilepsy

T2 - correlation between device setting parameters and acute response

AU - Ghani, S.

AU - Vilensky, Joel

AU - Turner, B.

AU - Tubbs, R. S.

AU - Loukas, M.

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - Background: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an adjunctive neurophysiological treatment for those patients who have pharmacoresistant or surgically resistant partial onset epilepsy. Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the effects of high and low stimulation paradigms on a responder rate of ≥50 and ≥75 % reduction in seizure frequency and associated adverse effects in adults and children. Method: A literature search was performed using Medline, PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library for studies using vagus nerve stimulation published from January 1980 until July 2014 for medically or surgically resistant partial onset seizures, in children and adults. No restrictions on languages were imposed. Data collection and analysis: Four authors reviewed and selected studies for inclusion and exclusion. The search identified five randomized control trials that fit with our inclusion criteria. The following outcomes were evaluated: 50 % or greater reduction in total seizure frequency, 75 % or greater reduction in total seizure frequency, and adverse effects. Results: Four randomized controlled trials were analyzed in this meta-analysis. Results indicate high stimulation is more effective in adult patients who experienced ≥50 and ≥75 % reduction in seizure frequency with a significant difference within both high and low stimulation groups. In children, there was no significant difference between the two groups and patients with ≥50 % reduction in seizures. Adverse effects such as hoarseness and dyspnea were more common in the high stimulation group where the remaining side effects were not statistically different among both groups. Conclusion: High stimulation is more effective than low stimulation in producing a greater reduction in seizure frequency in patients with medically and surgically resistant epilepsy.

AB - Background: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an adjunctive neurophysiological treatment for those patients who have pharmacoresistant or surgically resistant partial onset epilepsy. Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the effects of high and low stimulation paradigms on a responder rate of ≥50 and ≥75 % reduction in seizure frequency and associated adverse effects in adults and children. Method: A literature search was performed using Medline, PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library for studies using vagus nerve stimulation published from January 1980 until July 2014 for medically or surgically resistant partial onset seizures, in children and adults. No restrictions on languages were imposed. Data collection and analysis: Four authors reviewed and selected studies for inclusion and exclusion. The search identified five randomized control trials that fit with our inclusion criteria. The following outcomes were evaluated: 50 % or greater reduction in total seizure frequency, 75 % or greater reduction in total seizure frequency, and adverse effects. Results: Four randomized controlled trials were analyzed in this meta-analysis. Results indicate high stimulation is more effective in adult patients who experienced ≥50 and ≥75 % reduction in seizure frequency with a significant difference within both high and low stimulation groups. In children, there was no significant difference between the two groups and patients with ≥50 % reduction in seizures. Adverse effects such as hoarseness and dyspnea were more common in the high stimulation group where the remaining side effects were not statistically different among both groups. Conclusion: High stimulation is more effective than low stimulation in producing a greater reduction in seizure frequency in patients with medically and surgically resistant epilepsy.

KW - Adults

KW - Children

KW - Epilepsy

KW - NCP

KW - Vagus nerve stimulation

KW - VNS

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947038293&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84947038293&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00381-015-2921-1

DO - 10.1007/s00381-015-2921-1

M3 - Article

C2 - 26493055

AN - SCOPUS:84947038293

VL - 31

SP - 2291

EP - 2304

JO - Child's Nervous System

JF - Child's Nervous System

SN - 0256-7040

IS - 12

ER -