Methods of cancer case selection: Implications for research

Audrey F. Saftlas, William A. Satariano, G. Marie Swanson, Larry D. Roi, Samuel Albert

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    5 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Saftias, A. F., W. A. Satariano (Michigan Cancer Foundation, Detroit, Ml 48201), G. M. Swanson, L. D. Roi and S. Albert Methods of cancer case selection: Implications for research. Am J Epidemiol 1983; 118: 852-6.The race, age, and sex differences between clinically and microscopically diagnosed cancer cases for a total of 63, 301 incident cases for 18 sites are reported. The cases, diagnosed during 1973-1978, were drawn from the Cancer Surveillance Section in the Division of Epidemiology at the Michigan Cancer Foundation in Detroit, a participant in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. Although microscopically diagnosed cases and those diagnosed by other methods differed by race and sex for a few sites, the two case groups differed by age for 15 of the 18 sites examined. Cases without microscopic diagnoses (i.e., clinical diagnoses) tended to be older than microscopically confirmed cases. These findings indicate that in studies of certain cancer sites, the method of case selection could affect results pertaining to age differences in exposure to and effects of relevant risk factors.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)852-856
    Number of pages5
    JournalAmerican journal of epidemiology
    Volume118
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Dec 1983

    Fingerprint

    Research
    Neoplasms
    SEER Program
    Sex Characteristics
    Epidemiology
    Age Groups

    Keywords

    • Aged
    • Epidemiologic methods
    • Neoplasms
    • Research design

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Geriatrics and Gerontology
    • Epidemiology

    Cite this

    Saftlas, A. F., Satariano, W. A., Swanson, G. M., Roi, L. D., & Albert, S. (1983). Methods of cancer case selection: Implications for research. American journal of epidemiology, 118(6), 852-856. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113703

    Methods of cancer case selection : Implications for research. / Saftlas, Audrey F.; Satariano, William A.; Swanson, G. Marie; Roi, Larry D.; Albert, Samuel.

    In: American journal of epidemiology, Vol. 118, No. 6, 12.1983, p. 852-856.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Saftlas, AF, Satariano, WA, Swanson, GM, Roi, LD & Albert, S 1983, 'Methods of cancer case selection: Implications for research', American journal of epidemiology, vol. 118, no. 6, pp. 852-856. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113703
    Saftlas, Audrey F. ; Satariano, William A. ; Swanson, G. Marie ; Roi, Larry D. ; Albert, Samuel. / Methods of cancer case selection : Implications for research. In: American journal of epidemiology. 1983 ; Vol. 118, No. 6. pp. 852-856.
    @article{82de6fb84ba0472abbb10d55e8bc38d7,
    title = "Methods of cancer case selection: Implications for research",
    abstract = "Saftias, A. F., W. A. Satariano (Michigan Cancer Foundation, Detroit, Ml 48201), G. M. Swanson, L. D. Roi and S. Albert Methods of cancer case selection: Implications for research. Am J Epidemiol 1983; 118: 852-6.The race, age, and sex differences between clinically and microscopically diagnosed cancer cases for a total of 63, 301 incident cases for 18 sites are reported. The cases, diagnosed during 1973-1978, were drawn from the Cancer Surveillance Section in the Division of Epidemiology at the Michigan Cancer Foundation in Detroit, a participant in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. Although microscopically diagnosed cases and those diagnosed by other methods differed by race and sex for a few sites, the two case groups differed by age for 15 of the 18 sites examined. Cases without microscopic diagnoses (i.e., clinical diagnoses) tended to be older than microscopically confirmed cases. These findings indicate that in studies of certain cancer sites, the method of case selection could affect results pertaining to age differences in exposure to and effects of relevant risk factors.",
    keywords = "Aged, Epidemiologic methods, Neoplasms, Research design",
    author = "Saftlas, {Audrey F.} and Satariano, {William A.} and Swanson, {G. Marie} and Roi, {Larry D.} and Samuel Albert",
    year = "1983",
    month = "12",
    doi = "10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113703",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "118",
    pages = "852--856",
    journal = "American Journal of Epidemiology",
    issn = "0002-9262",
    publisher = "Oxford University Press",
    number = "6",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Methods of cancer case selection

    T2 - Implications for research

    AU - Saftlas, Audrey F.

    AU - Satariano, William A.

    AU - Swanson, G. Marie

    AU - Roi, Larry D.

    AU - Albert, Samuel

    PY - 1983/12

    Y1 - 1983/12

    N2 - Saftias, A. F., W. A. Satariano (Michigan Cancer Foundation, Detroit, Ml 48201), G. M. Swanson, L. D. Roi and S. Albert Methods of cancer case selection: Implications for research. Am J Epidemiol 1983; 118: 852-6.The race, age, and sex differences between clinically and microscopically diagnosed cancer cases for a total of 63, 301 incident cases for 18 sites are reported. The cases, diagnosed during 1973-1978, were drawn from the Cancer Surveillance Section in the Division of Epidemiology at the Michigan Cancer Foundation in Detroit, a participant in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. Although microscopically diagnosed cases and those diagnosed by other methods differed by race and sex for a few sites, the two case groups differed by age for 15 of the 18 sites examined. Cases without microscopic diagnoses (i.e., clinical diagnoses) tended to be older than microscopically confirmed cases. These findings indicate that in studies of certain cancer sites, the method of case selection could affect results pertaining to age differences in exposure to and effects of relevant risk factors.

    AB - Saftias, A. F., W. A. Satariano (Michigan Cancer Foundation, Detroit, Ml 48201), G. M. Swanson, L. D. Roi and S. Albert Methods of cancer case selection: Implications for research. Am J Epidemiol 1983; 118: 852-6.The race, age, and sex differences between clinically and microscopically diagnosed cancer cases for a total of 63, 301 incident cases for 18 sites are reported. The cases, diagnosed during 1973-1978, were drawn from the Cancer Surveillance Section in the Division of Epidemiology at the Michigan Cancer Foundation in Detroit, a participant in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. Although microscopically diagnosed cases and those diagnosed by other methods differed by race and sex for a few sites, the two case groups differed by age for 15 of the 18 sites examined. Cases without microscopic diagnoses (i.e., clinical diagnoses) tended to be older than microscopically confirmed cases. These findings indicate that in studies of certain cancer sites, the method of case selection could affect results pertaining to age differences in exposure to and effects of relevant risk factors.

    KW - Aged

    KW - Epidemiologic methods

    KW - Neoplasms

    KW - Research design

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021081268&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021081268&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113703

    DO - 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113703

    M3 - Article

    C2 - 6650486

    AN - SCOPUS:0021081268

    VL - 118

    SP - 852

    EP - 856

    JO - American Journal of Epidemiology

    JF - American Journal of Epidemiology

    SN - 0002-9262

    IS - 6

    ER -