Microstructural evolution and physical behavior of a lithium disilicate glass-ceramic

Wen Lien, Howard W. Roberts, Jeffrey Platt, Kraig S. Vandewalle, Thomas J. Hill, T.M. Gabriel Chu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Elucidating the microstructural responses of the lithium disilicate system like the popular IPS e.max® CAD (LS2), made specifically for computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM), as a temperature-dependent system unravels new ways to enhance material properties and performance. Objective To study the effect of various thermal processing on the crystallization kinetics, crystallite microstructure, and strength of LS2. Methods The control group of the LS2 samples was heated using the standard manufacturer heating-schedule. Two experimental groups were tested: (1) an extended temperature range (750-840°C vs. 820-840°C) at the segment of 30°C/min heating rate, and (2) a protracted holding time (14 min vs. 7 min) at the isothermal temperature of 840°C. Five other groups of different heating schedules with lower-targeted temperatures were evaluated to investigate the microstructural changes. For each group, the crystalline phases and morphologies were measured by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscope (SEM), respectively. Differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) was used to determine the activation energy of LS2 under non-isothermal conditions. A universal testing machine was used to measure 3-point flexural strength and fracture toughness, and elastic modulus and hardness were measured by a nanoindenter. A one-way ANOVA/Tukey was performed per property (alpha = 0.05). Results DSC, XRD, and SEM revealed three distinct microstructures during LS2 crystallization. Significant differences were found between the control group, the two aforementioned experimental groups, and the five lower-targeted-temperature groups per property (p <0.05). The activation energy for lithium disilicate growth was 667 (±29.0) kJ/mol. Conclusions Groups with the extended temperature range (750-840°C) and protracted holding time (820-840°C H14) produced significantly higher elastic-modulus and hardness properties than the control group but showed similar flexural-strength and fracture-toughness properties with the control group. In general, rapid growth of lithium disilicates occurred only when maximum formation of lithium metasilicates had ended.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)928-940
Number of pages13
JournalDental Materials
Volume31
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2015

Fingerprint

Microstructural evolution
Glass ceramics
Lithium
Temperature
Heating
Scanning
Computer-Aided Design
Control Groups
Elastic Modulus
Hardness
Crystallization
Calorimeters
X-Ray Diffraction
Bending strength
Fracture toughness
Computer aided design
Appointments and Schedules
Electron microscopes
Activation energy
Elastic moduli

Keywords

  • Crystallization
  • Differential scanning calorimetry
  • Glass-ceramic
  • Heating schedule
  • IPS e.max® CAD
  • Lithium disilicate
  • Lithium metasilicate
  • Microstructure
  • Nanoindentation
  • Nucleation
  • Phase transformation
  • Temperature threshold

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)
  • Materials Science(all)
  • Mechanics of Materials

Cite this

Microstructural evolution and physical behavior of a lithium disilicate glass-ceramic. / Lien, Wen; Roberts, Howard W.; Platt, Jeffrey; Vandewalle, Kraig S.; Hill, Thomas J.; Chu, T.M. Gabriel.

In: Dental Materials, Vol. 31, No. 8, 01.08.2015, p. 928-940.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lien, Wen ; Roberts, Howard W. ; Platt, Jeffrey ; Vandewalle, Kraig S. ; Hill, Thomas J. ; Chu, T.M. Gabriel. / Microstructural evolution and physical behavior of a lithium disilicate glass-ceramic. In: Dental Materials. 2015 ; Vol. 31, No. 8. pp. 928-940.
@article{f328801e91c14472b46be7d0a58853cb,
title = "Microstructural evolution and physical behavior of a lithium disilicate glass-ceramic",
abstract = "Background Elucidating the microstructural responses of the lithium disilicate system like the popular IPS e.max{\circledR} CAD (LS2), made specifically for computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM), as a temperature-dependent system unravels new ways to enhance material properties and performance. Objective To study the effect of various thermal processing on the crystallization kinetics, crystallite microstructure, and strength of LS2. Methods The control group of the LS2 samples was heated using the standard manufacturer heating-schedule. Two experimental groups were tested: (1) an extended temperature range (750-840°C vs. 820-840°C) at the segment of 30°C/min heating rate, and (2) a protracted holding time (14 min vs. 7 min) at the isothermal temperature of 840°C. Five other groups of different heating schedules with lower-targeted temperatures were evaluated to investigate the microstructural changes. For each group, the crystalline phases and morphologies were measured by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscope (SEM), respectively. Differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) was used to determine the activation energy of LS2 under non-isothermal conditions. A universal testing machine was used to measure 3-point flexural strength and fracture toughness, and elastic modulus and hardness were measured by a nanoindenter. A one-way ANOVA/Tukey was performed per property (alpha = 0.05). Results DSC, XRD, and SEM revealed three distinct microstructures during LS2 crystallization. Significant differences were found between the control group, the two aforementioned experimental groups, and the five lower-targeted-temperature groups per property (p <0.05). The activation energy for lithium disilicate growth was 667 (±29.0) kJ/mol. Conclusions Groups with the extended temperature range (750-840°C) and protracted holding time (820-840°C H14) produced significantly higher elastic-modulus and hardness properties than the control group but showed similar flexural-strength and fracture-toughness properties with the control group. In general, rapid growth of lithium disilicates occurred only when maximum formation of lithium metasilicates had ended.",
keywords = "Crystallization, Differential scanning calorimetry, Glass-ceramic, Heating schedule, IPS e.max{\circledR} CAD, Lithium disilicate, Lithium metasilicate, Microstructure, Nanoindentation, Nucleation, Phase transformation, Temperature threshold",
author = "Wen Lien and Roberts, {Howard W.} and Jeffrey Platt and Vandewalle, {Kraig S.} and Hill, {Thomas J.} and Chu, {T.M. Gabriel}",
year = "2015",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.dental.2015.05.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "928--940",
journal = "Dental Materials",
issn = "0109-5641",
publisher = "Elsevier Science",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Microstructural evolution and physical behavior of a lithium disilicate glass-ceramic

AU - Lien, Wen

AU - Roberts, Howard W.

AU - Platt, Jeffrey

AU - Vandewalle, Kraig S.

AU - Hill, Thomas J.

AU - Chu, T.M. Gabriel

PY - 2015/8/1

Y1 - 2015/8/1

N2 - Background Elucidating the microstructural responses of the lithium disilicate system like the popular IPS e.max® CAD (LS2), made specifically for computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM), as a temperature-dependent system unravels new ways to enhance material properties and performance. Objective To study the effect of various thermal processing on the crystallization kinetics, crystallite microstructure, and strength of LS2. Methods The control group of the LS2 samples was heated using the standard manufacturer heating-schedule. Two experimental groups were tested: (1) an extended temperature range (750-840°C vs. 820-840°C) at the segment of 30°C/min heating rate, and (2) a protracted holding time (14 min vs. 7 min) at the isothermal temperature of 840°C. Five other groups of different heating schedules with lower-targeted temperatures were evaluated to investigate the microstructural changes. For each group, the crystalline phases and morphologies were measured by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscope (SEM), respectively. Differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) was used to determine the activation energy of LS2 under non-isothermal conditions. A universal testing machine was used to measure 3-point flexural strength and fracture toughness, and elastic modulus and hardness were measured by a nanoindenter. A one-way ANOVA/Tukey was performed per property (alpha = 0.05). Results DSC, XRD, and SEM revealed three distinct microstructures during LS2 crystallization. Significant differences were found between the control group, the two aforementioned experimental groups, and the five lower-targeted-temperature groups per property (p <0.05). The activation energy for lithium disilicate growth was 667 (±29.0) kJ/mol. Conclusions Groups with the extended temperature range (750-840°C) and protracted holding time (820-840°C H14) produced significantly higher elastic-modulus and hardness properties than the control group but showed similar flexural-strength and fracture-toughness properties with the control group. In general, rapid growth of lithium disilicates occurred only when maximum formation of lithium metasilicates had ended.

AB - Background Elucidating the microstructural responses of the lithium disilicate system like the popular IPS e.max® CAD (LS2), made specifically for computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM), as a temperature-dependent system unravels new ways to enhance material properties and performance. Objective To study the effect of various thermal processing on the crystallization kinetics, crystallite microstructure, and strength of LS2. Methods The control group of the LS2 samples was heated using the standard manufacturer heating-schedule. Two experimental groups were tested: (1) an extended temperature range (750-840°C vs. 820-840°C) at the segment of 30°C/min heating rate, and (2) a protracted holding time (14 min vs. 7 min) at the isothermal temperature of 840°C. Five other groups of different heating schedules with lower-targeted temperatures were evaluated to investigate the microstructural changes. For each group, the crystalline phases and morphologies were measured by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscope (SEM), respectively. Differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) was used to determine the activation energy of LS2 under non-isothermal conditions. A universal testing machine was used to measure 3-point flexural strength and fracture toughness, and elastic modulus and hardness were measured by a nanoindenter. A one-way ANOVA/Tukey was performed per property (alpha = 0.05). Results DSC, XRD, and SEM revealed three distinct microstructures during LS2 crystallization. Significant differences were found between the control group, the two aforementioned experimental groups, and the five lower-targeted-temperature groups per property (p <0.05). The activation energy for lithium disilicate growth was 667 (±29.0) kJ/mol. Conclusions Groups with the extended temperature range (750-840°C) and protracted holding time (820-840°C H14) produced significantly higher elastic-modulus and hardness properties than the control group but showed similar flexural-strength and fracture-toughness properties with the control group. In general, rapid growth of lithium disilicates occurred only when maximum formation of lithium metasilicates had ended.

KW - Crystallization

KW - Differential scanning calorimetry

KW - Glass-ceramic

KW - Heating schedule

KW - IPS e.max® CAD

KW - Lithium disilicate

KW - Lithium metasilicate

KW - Microstructure

KW - Nanoindentation

KW - Nucleation

KW - Phase transformation

KW - Temperature threshold

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937512758&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937512758&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.dental.2015.05.003

DO - 10.1016/j.dental.2015.05.003

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 928

EP - 940

JO - Dental Materials

JF - Dental Materials

SN - 0109-5641

IS - 8

ER -