Miss rate of right-sided colon examination during colonoscopy defined by retroflexion: An observational study

David G. Hewett, Douglas Rex

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

103 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Colonoscopy is less effective in the proximal compared with the distal colon. Objective: To describe the success rate, yield, and safety of retroflexion of the right side of the colon after a careful forward-viewing examination. Design: Prospective observational study. Setting: Tertiary-care hospital outpatient endoscopy center and associated ambulatory surgery center. Patients: A total of 1000 consecutive adults undergoing elective screening or surveillance colonoscopy, without previous bowel resection, inflammatory bowel disease, or polyposis syndromes. Intervention: After cecal intubation, a careful examination of the cecum to the hepatic flexure was performed in the forward view with removal of all identified polyps. The colonoscope was then reinserted to the cecum and retroflexed, and examination was performed to the hepatic flexure in retroflexion. Main Outcome Measurements: Success rate, per-polyp and per-patient miss rates, and adverse events rate of retroflexion. Results: Retroflexion was successful in 94.4% of patients. Looping in the insertion tube was the apparent cause of 89% of failed attempts. The forward view identified 634 proximal colon polyps and 497 adenomas, and retroflexion identified an additional 68 polyps and 54 adenomas, representing a per-adenoma miss rate of 9.8% and an intention-to-treat, per-patient adenoma miss rate of 4.4%. Older age, male sex, and polyps seen on the forward view predicted polyps seen on retroflexion. There were no adverse events. Limitations: Single-center, uncontrolled study with only 2 endoscopists. Conclusions: Right-sided colon retroflexion is generally achievable and safe in our hands. The yield is comparable to that expected from a second examination in the forward view.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)246-252
Number of pages7
JournalGastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume74
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2011

Fingerprint

Colonoscopy
Polyps
Observational Studies
Colon
Adenoma
Cecum
Colonoscopes
Liver
Tertiary Healthcare
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
Intubation
Tertiary Care Centers
Endoscopy
Outpatients
Prospective Studies
Safety

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Miss rate of right-sided colon examination during colonoscopy defined by retroflexion : An observational study. / Hewett, David G.; Rex, Douglas.

In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Vol. 74, No. 2, 08.2011, p. 246-252.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{88cacb50716a48378bda8afd6864869d,
title = "Miss rate of right-sided colon examination during colonoscopy defined by retroflexion: An observational study",
abstract = "Background: Colonoscopy is less effective in the proximal compared with the distal colon. Objective: To describe the success rate, yield, and safety of retroflexion of the right side of the colon after a careful forward-viewing examination. Design: Prospective observational study. Setting: Tertiary-care hospital outpatient endoscopy center and associated ambulatory surgery center. Patients: A total of 1000 consecutive adults undergoing elective screening or surveillance colonoscopy, without previous bowel resection, inflammatory bowel disease, or polyposis syndromes. Intervention: After cecal intubation, a careful examination of the cecum to the hepatic flexure was performed in the forward view with removal of all identified polyps. The colonoscope was then reinserted to the cecum and retroflexed, and examination was performed to the hepatic flexure in retroflexion. Main Outcome Measurements: Success rate, per-polyp and per-patient miss rates, and adverse events rate of retroflexion. Results: Retroflexion was successful in 94.4{\%} of patients. Looping in the insertion tube was the apparent cause of 89{\%} of failed attempts. The forward view identified 634 proximal colon polyps and 497 adenomas, and retroflexion identified an additional 68 polyps and 54 adenomas, representing a per-adenoma miss rate of 9.8{\%} and an intention-to-treat, per-patient adenoma miss rate of 4.4{\%}. Older age, male sex, and polyps seen on the forward view predicted polyps seen on retroflexion. There were no adverse events. Limitations: Single-center, uncontrolled study with only 2 endoscopists. Conclusions: Right-sided colon retroflexion is generally achievable and safe in our hands. The yield is comparable to that expected from a second examination in the forward view.",
author = "Hewett, {David G.} and Douglas Rex",
year = "2011",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.gie.2011.04.005",
language = "English",
volume = "74",
pages = "246--252",
journal = "Gastrointestinal Endoscopy",
issn = "0016-5107",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Miss rate of right-sided colon examination during colonoscopy defined by retroflexion

T2 - An observational study

AU - Hewett, David G.

AU - Rex, Douglas

PY - 2011/8

Y1 - 2011/8

N2 - Background: Colonoscopy is less effective in the proximal compared with the distal colon. Objective: To describe the success rate, yield, and safety of retroflexion of the right side of the colon after a careful forward-viewing examination. Design: Prospective observational study. Setting: Tertiary-care hospital outpatient endoscopy center and associated ambulatory surgery center. Patients: A total of 1000 consecutive adults undergoing elective screening or surveillance colonoscopy, without previous bowel resection, inflammatory bowel disease, or polyposis syndromes. Intervention: After cecal intubation, a careful examination of the cecum to the hepatic flexure was performed in the forward view with removal of all identified polyps. The colonoscope was then reinserted to the cecum and retroflexed, and examination was performed to the hepatic flexure in retroflexion. Main Outcome Measurements: Success rate, per-polyp and per-patient miss rates, and adverse events rate of retroflexion. Results: Retroflexion was successful in 94.4% of patients. Looping in the insertion tube was the apparent cause of 89% of failed attempts. The forward view identified 634 proximal colon polyps and 497 adenomas, and retroflexion identified an additional 68 polyps and 54 adenomas, representing a per-adenoma miss rate of 9.8% and an intention-to-treat, per-patient adenoma miss rate of 4.4%. Older age, male sex, and polyps seen on the forward view predicted polyps seen on retroflexion. There were no adverse events. Limitations: Single-center, uncontrolled study with only 2 endoscopists. Conclusions: Right-sided colon retroflexion is generally achievable and safe in our hands. The yield is comparable to that expected from a second examination in the forward view.

AB - Background: Colonoscopy is less effective in the proximal compared with the distal colon. Objective: To describe the success rate, yield, and safety of retroflexion of the right side of the colon after a careful forward-viewing examination. Design: Prospective observational study. Setting: Tertiary-care hospital outpatient endoscopy center and associated ambulatory surgery center. Patients: A total of 1000 consecutive adults undergoing elective screening or surveillance colonoscopy, without previous bowel resection, inflammatory bowel disease, or polyposis syndromes. Intervention: After cecal intubation, a careful examination of the cecum to the hepatic flexure was performed in the forward view with removal of all identified polyps. The colonoscope was then reinserted to the cecum and retroflexed, and examination was performed to the hepatic flexure in retroflexion. Main Outcome Measurements: Success rate, per-polyp and per-patient miss rates, and adverse events rate of retroflexion. Results: Retroflexion was successful in 94.4% of patients. Looping in the insertion tube was the apparent cause of 89% of failed attempts. The forward view identified 634 proximal colon polyps and 497 adenomas, and retroflexion identified an additional 68 polyps and 54 adenomas, representing a per-adenoma miss rate of 9.8% and an intention-to-treat, per-patient adenoma miss rate of 4.4%. Older age, male sex, and polyps seen on the forward view predicted polyps seen on retroflexion. There were no adverse events. Limitations: Single-center, uncontrolled study with only 2 endoscopists. Conclusions: Right-sided colon retroflexion is generally achievable and safe in our hands. The yield is comparable to that expected from a second examination in the forward view.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960936805&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79960936805&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gie.2011.04.005

DO - 10.1016/j.gie.2011.04.005

M3 - Article

C2 - 21679946

AN - SCOPUS:79960936805

VL - 74

SP - 246

EP - 252

JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

SN - 0016-5107

IS - 2

ER -