Missed opportunities! End of life decision making and discussions in implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients

Jennifer L. Miller, Misook L. Chung, Farshid Etaee, Muna Hammash, Ingela Thylén, Martha J. Biddle, Samy C. Elayi, Mary M. Czarapata, Samantha McEvedy, Jan Cameron, Christine Haedtke, Chantal F. Ski, David R. Thompson, Debra K. Moser

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities were updated in 2008 including discussions prior to implantation with implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) recipients regarding end-of-life (EOL) choices. Objectives: To explore patients’ knowledge of the function of the ICD at EOL. Methods: ICD recipients from Central Kentucky and Melbourne, Australia completed the Experiences, Attitudes, and Knowledge of EOL. Results: Of the 240 ICD recipients, 76% reported that they have never had discussions with their health care provider regarding the withdrawal of defibrillation therapy. A total of 38% believed that turning off the ICD shocks was the same as active euthanasia and that disabling defibrillation therapy required surgical intervention; 37% believed that once defibrillation was disabled, it could not be enabled again. Conclusions: Adherence to guidelines regarding EOL discussions with ICD recipients was minimal from the patients' perspective. Most patients may hold alarming misperceptions that could interfere with optimal EOL care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalHeart and Lung
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Implantable Defibrillators
Decision Making
Active Euthanasia
Guideline Adherence
Terminal Care
Health Personnel
Shock
Therapeutics
Guidelines
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • End of life
  • End-of-Life Issues in Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Patients Questionnaire
  • Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
  • Implantable cardioverter defibrillator
  • Newest Vital Sign

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Missed opportunities! End of life decision making and discussions in implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients. / Miller, Jennifer L.; Chung, Misook L.; Etaee, Farshid; Hammash, Muna; Thylén, Ingela; Biddle, Martha J.; Elayi, Samy C.; Czarapata, Mary M.; McEvedy, Samantha; Cameron, Jan; Haedtke, Christine; Ski, Chantal F.; Thompson, David R.; Moser, Debra K.

In: Heart and Lung, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Miller, JL, Chung, ML, Etaee, F, Hammash, M, Thylén, I, Biddle, MJ, Elayi, SC, Czarapata, MM, McEvedy, S, Cameron, J, Haedtke, C, Ski, CF, Thompson, DR & Moser, DK 2019, 'Missed opportunities! End of life decision making and discussions in implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients', Heart and Lung. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2019.04.006
Miller, Jennifer L. ; Chung, Misook L. ; Etaee, Farshid ; Hammash, Muna ; Thylén, Ingela ; Biddle, Martha J. ; Elayi, Samy C. ; Czarapata, Mary M. ; McEvedy, Samantha ; Cameron, Jan ; Haedtke, Christine ; Ski, Chantal F. ; Thompson, David R. ; Moser, Debra K. / Missed opportunities! End of life decision making and discussions in implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients. In: Heart and Lung. 2019.
@article{d826307b2e8b48f5925a0133d7b2467a,
title = "Missed opportunities! End of life decision making and discussions in implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients",
abstract = "Background: Guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities were updated in 2008 including discussions prior to implantation with implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) recipients regarding end-of-life (EOL) choices. Objectives: To explore patients’ knowledge of the function of the ICD at EOL. Methods: ICD recipients from Central Kentucky and Melbourne, Australia completed the Experiences, Attitudes, and Knowledge of EOL. Results: Of the 240 ICD recipients, 76{\%} reported that they have never had discussions with their health care provider regarding the withdrawal of defibrillation therapy. A total of 38{\%} believed that turning off the ICD shocks was the same as active euthanasia and that disabling defibrillation therapy required surgical intervention; 37{\%} believed that once defibrillation was disabled, it could not be enabled again. Conclusions: Adherence to guidelines regarding EOL discussions with ICD recipients was minimal from the patients' perspective. Most patients may hold alarming misperceptions that could interfere with optimal EOL care.",
keywords = "End of life, End-of-Life Issues in Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Patients Questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Implantable cardioverter defibrillator, Newest Vital Sign",
author = "Miller, {Jennifer L.} and Chung, {Misook L.} and Farshid Etaee and Muna Hammash and Ingela Thyl{\'e}n and Biddle, {Martha J.} and Elayi, {Samy C.} and Czarapata, {Mary M.} and Samantha McEvedy and Jan Cameron and Christine Haedtke and Ski, {Chantal F.} and Thompson, {David R.} and Moser, {Debra K.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.hrtlng.2019.04.006",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Heart and Lung: Journal of Acute and Critical Care",
issn = "0147-9563",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Missed opportunities! End of life decision making and discussions in implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients

AU - Miller, Jennifer L.

AU - Chung, Misook L.

AU - Etaee, Farshid

AU - Hammash, Muna

AU - Thylén, Ingela

AU - Biddle, Martha J.

AU - Elayi, Samy C.

AU - Czarapata, Mary M.

AU - McEvedy, Samantha

AU - Cameron, Jan

AU - Haedtke, Christine

AU - Ski, Chantal F.

AU - Thompson, David R.

AU - Moser, Debra K.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background: Guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities were updated in 2008 including discussions prior to implantation with implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) recipients regarding end-of-life (EOL) choices. Objectives: To explore patients’ knowledge of the function of the ICD at EOL. Methods: ICD recipients from Central Kentucky and Melbourne, Australia completed the Experiences, Attitudes, and Knowledge of EOL. Results: Of the 240 ICD recipients, 76% reported that they have never had discussions with their health care provider regarding the withdrawal of defibrillation therapy. A total of 38% believed that turning off the ICD shocks was the same as active euthanasia and that disabling defibrillation therapy required surgical intervention; 37% believed that once defibrillation was disabled, it could not be enabled again. Conclusions: Adherence to guidelines regarding EOL discussions with ICD recipients was minimal from the patients' perspective. Most patients may hold alarming misperceptions that could interfere with optimal EOL care.

AB - Background: Guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities were updated in 2008 including discussions prior to implantation with implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) recipients regarding end-of-life (EOL) choices. Objectives: To explore patients’ knowledge of the function of the ICD at EOL. Methods: ICD recipients from Central Kentucky and Melbourne, Australia completed the Experiences, Attitudes, and Knowledge of EOL. Results: Of the 240 ICD recipients, 76% reported that they have never had discussions with their health care provider regarding the withdrawal of defibrillation therapy. A total of 38% believed that turning off the ICD shocks was the same as active euthanasia and that disabling defibrillation therapy required surgical intervention; 37% believed that once defibrillation was disabled, it could not be enabled again. Conclusions: Adherence to guidelines regarding EOL discussions with ICD recipients was minimal from the patients' perspective. Most patients may hold alarming misperceptions that could interfere with optimal EOL care.

KW - End of life

KW - End-of-Life Issues in Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Patients Questionnaire

KW - Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

KW - Implantable cardioverter defibrillator

KW - Newest Vital Sign

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065102527&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065102527&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2019.04.006

DO - 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2019.04.006

M3 - Article

C2 - 31076180

AN - SCOPUS:85065102527

JO - Heart and Lung: Journal of Acute and Critical Care

JF - Heart and Lung: Journal of Acute and Critical Care

SN - 0147-9563

ER -