Motivations for dieting

Drive for thinness is different from drive for objective thinness

Yelena Chernyak, Michael R. Lowe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Drive for thinness is a cardinal feature of bulimia nervosa. However, the widely used Drive for Thinness (DFT) subscale of the Eating Disorder Inventory (Garner, 2004; Garner, Olmstead, & Polivy, 1983) appears to measure a desire to be thinner, not a desire to be objectively thin. We developed the Drive for Objective Thinness (DFOT) Scale and compared unrestrained and restrained eaters and those with bulimia nervosa on the DFT subscale, Goldfarb's Fear of Fat Scale (GFFS; Goldfarb, Dykens, & Gerrard, 1983), and the DFOT Scale. Restrained eaters had higher scores than unrestrained eaters on the DFT subscale and the GFFS, but both groups had low scores on the DFOT Scale. Only the group with bulimia nervosa showed elevated scores on the DFOT Scale. We conclude that restrained eaters diet mostly to avoid weight gain, that individuals with bulimia nervosa diet to achieve thinness and avoid fatness, and that the drive for objective thinness is a unique feature of bulimia nervosa.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)276-281
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Abnormal Psychology
Volume119
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Thinness
Motivation
Bulimia Nervosa
Drive
Diet
Weight Gain
Fear
Fats
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • Bulimia nervosa
  • Dieting
  • Drive for thinness
  • Motivation
  • Restrained eating

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Motivations for dieting : Drive for thinness is different from drive for objective thinness. / Chernyak, Yelena; Lowe, Michael R.

In: Journal of Abnormal Psychology, Vol. 119, No. 2, 05.2010, p. 276-281.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e09647f7f91c44edaf7d15d8d9120878,
title = "Motivations for dieting: Drive for thinness is different from drive for objective thinness",
abstract = "Drive for thinness is a cardinal feature of bulimia nervosa. However, the widely used Drive for Thinness (DFT) subscale of the Eating Disorder Inventory (Garner, 2004; Garner, Olmstead, & Polivy, 1983) appears to measure a desire to be thinner, not a desire to be objectively thin. We developed the Drive for Objective Thinness (DFOT) Scale and compared unrestrained and restrained eaters and those with bulimia nervosa on the DFT subscale, Goldfarb's Fear of Fat Scale (GFFS; Goldfarb, Dykens, & Gerrard, 1983), and the DFOT Scale. Restrained eaters had higher scores than unrestrained eaters on the DFT subscale and the GFFS, but both groups had low scores on the DFOT Scale. Only the group with bulimia nervosa showed elevated scores on the DFOT Scale. We conclude that restrained eaters diet mostly to avoid weight gain, that individuals with bulimia nervosa diet to achieve thinness and avoid fatness, and that the drive for objective thinness is a unique feature of bulimia nervosa.",
keywords = "Bulimia nervosa, Dieting, Drive for thinness, Motivation, Restrained eating",
author = "Yelena Chernyak and Lowe, {Michael R.}",
year = "2010",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1037/a0018398",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "119",
pages = "276--281",
journal = "Journal of Abnormal Psychology",
issn = "0021-843X",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Motivations for dieting

T2 - Drive for thinness is different from drive for objective thinness

AU - Chernyak, Yelena

AU - Lowe, Michael R.

PY - 2010/5

Y1 - 2010/5

N2 - Drive for thinness is a cardinal feature of bulimia nervosa. However, the widely used Drive for Thinness (DFT) subscale of the Eating Disorder Inventory (Garner, 2004; Garner, Olmstead, & Polivy, 1983) appears to measure a desire to be thinner, not a desire to be objectively thin. We developed the Drive for Objective Thinness (DFOT) Scale and compared unrestrained and restrained eaters and those with bulimia nervosa on the DFT subscale, Goldfarb's Fear of Fat Scale (GFFS; Goldfarb, Dykens, & Gerrard, 1983), and the DFOT Scale. Restrained eaters had higher scores than unrestrained eaters on the DFT subscale and the GFFS, but both groups had low scores on the DFOT Scale. Only the group with bulimia nervosa showed elevated scores on the DFOT Scale. We conclude that restrained eaters diet mostly to avoid weight gain, that individuals with bulimia nervosa diet to achieve thinness and avoid fatness, and that the drive for objective thinness is a unique feature of bulimia nervosa.

AB - Drive for thinness is a cardinal feature of bulimia nervosa. However, the widely used Drive for Thinness (DFT) subscale of the Eating Disorder Inventory (Garner, 2004; Garner, Olmstead, & Polivy, 1983) appears to measure a desire to be thinner, not a desire to be objectively thin. We developed the Drive for Objective Thinness (DFOT) Scale and compared unrestrained and restrained eaters and those with bulimia nervosa on the DFT subscale, Goldfarb's Fear of Fat Scale (GFFS; Goldfarb, Dykens, & Gerrard, 1983), and the DFOT Scale. Restrained eaters had higher scores than unrestrained eaters on the DFT subscale and the GFFS, but both groups had low scores on the DFOT Scale. Only the group with bulimia nervosa showed elevated scores on the DFOT Scale. We conclude that restrained eaters diet mostly to avoid weight gain, that individuals with bulimia nervosa diet to achieve thinness and avoid fatness, and that the drive for objective thinness is a unique feature of bulimia nervosa.

KW - Bulimia nervosa

KW - Dieting

KW - Drive for thinness

KW - Motivation

KW - Restrained eating

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77952931634&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77952931634&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0018398

DO - 10.1037/a0018398

M3 - Article

VL - 119

SP - 276

EP - 281

JO - Journal of Abnormal Psychology

JF - Journal of Abnormal Psychology

SN - 0021-843X

IS - 2

ER -