Motor control of jaw movements: An fMRI study of parafunctional clench and grind behavior

Donald Wong, Mario Dzemidzic, Thomas M. Talavage, Laura M. Romito, Kenneth E. Byrd

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Jaw-clenching and tooth-grinding associated with bruxism can contribute to abnormal tooth wear and pain in the masticatory system. Clench and tooth-grinding jaw-movement tasks were evaluated in a block-design fMRI study comparing a dental-control (DC) group with a tooth-grinding (TG) group. Group classification was made prior to imaging based upon self-reported parafunctional clench and grind behavior and clinical evidence of abnormal tooth wear. Group differences in brain activation patterns were found for each task compared to the resting baseline. The DC group showed a more widely distributed pattern; more extensive activity in the supplementary motor area (SMA) proper that extended into the pre-SMA; and, for clench, activity in the left inferior parietal lobule (IPL). The DC group activated more than the TG subjects the left IPL for clench, and pre-SMA for grind. Neither task elicited more activity in the TG than DC subjects. Our group findings suggest that jaw-movement tasks executed by the TG group elicited (1) more efficient brain activation pattern consistent with other studies that found less extensive activity with executing "over-learned" tasks; (2) "underactive" SMA activity that underlies reduced motor planning; (3) decreased inferior parietal activity that is associated with lesser motor-attentional demands. Thus orofacial parafunctional habits may influence brain circuits recruited for jaw movements, providing a possible basis for understanding involuntary jaw movements in bruxism and oral movement disorders in general.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)206-217
Number of pages12
JournalBrain research
Volume1383
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 6 2011

Fingerprint

Jaw
Tooth
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Motor Cortex
Tooth Wear
Bruxism
Parietal Lobe
Control Groups
Brain
Stomatognathic System
Dyskinesias
Movement Disorders
Habits
Motor Activity
Pain

Keywords

  • Bruxism
  • fMRI
  • Involuntary movements
  • Mastication
  • Orofacial

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Molecular Biology

Cite this

Motor control of jaw movements : An fMRI study of parafunctional clench and grind behavior. / Wong, Donald; Dzemidzic, Mario; Talavage, Thomas M.; Romito, Laura M.; Byrd, Kenneth E.

In: Brain research, Vol. 1383, 06.04.2011, p. 206-217.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{19c9ee44a4414e56ad8fbafa32762f66,
title = "Motor control of jaw movements: An fMRI study of parafunctional clench and grind behavior",
abstract = "Jaw-clenching and tooth-grinding associated with bruxism can contribute to abnormal tooth wear and pain in the masticatory system. Clench and tooth-grinding jaw-movement tasks were evaluated in a block-design fMRI study comparing a dental-control (DC) group with a tooth-grinding (TG) group. Group classification was made prior to imaging based upon self-reported parafunctional clench and grind behavior and clinical evidence of abnormal tooth wear. Group differences in brain activation patterns were found for each task compared to the resting baseline. The DC group showed a more widely distributed pattern; more extensive activity in the supplementary motor area (SMA) proper that extended into the pre-SMA; and, for clench, activity in the left inferior parietal lobule (IPL). The DC group activated more than the TG subjects the left IPL for clench, and pre-SMA for grind. Neither task elicited more activity in the TG than DC subjects. Our group findings suggest that jaw-movement tasks executed by the TG group elicited (1) more efficient brain activation pattern consistent with other studies that found less extensive activity with executing {"}over-learned{"} tasks; (2) {"}underactive{"} SMA activity that underlies reduced motor planning; (3) decreased inferior parietal activity that is associated with lesser motor-attentional demands. Thus orofacial parafunctional habits may influence brain circuits recruited for jaw movements, providing a possible basis for understanding involuntary jaw movements in bruxism and oral movement disorders in general.",
keywords = "Bruxism, fMRI, Involuntary movements, Mastication, Orofacial",
author = "Donald Wong and Mario Dzemidzic and Talavage, {Thomas M.} and Romito, {Laura M.} and Byrd, {Kenneth E.}",
year = "2011",
month = "4",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.brainres.2011.01.096",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1383",
pages = "206--217",
journal = "Brain Research",
issn = "0006-8993",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Motor control of jaw movements

T2 - An fMRI study of parafunctional clench and grind behavior

AU - Wong, Donald

AU - Dzemidzic, Mario

AU - Talavage, Thomas M.

AU - Romito, Laura M.

AU - Byrd, Kenneth E.

PY - 2011/4/6

Y1 - 2011/4/6

N2 - Jaw-clenching and tooth-grinding associated with bruxism can contribute to abnormal tooth wear and pain in the masticatory system. Clench and tooth-grinding jaw-movement tasks were evaluated in a block-design fMRI study comparing a dental-control (DC) group with a tooth-grinding (TG) group. Group classification was made prior to imaging based upon self-reported parafunctional clench and grind behavior and clinical evidence of abnormal tooth wear. Group differences in brain activation patterns were found for each task compared to the resting baseline. The DC group showed a more widely distributed pattern; more extensive activity in the supplementary motor area (SMA) proper that extended into the pre-SMA; and, for clench, activity in the left inferior parietal lobule (IPL). The DC group activated more than the TG subjects the left IPL for clench, and pre-SMA for grind. Neither task elicited more activity in the TG than DC subjects. Our group findings suggest that jaw-movement tasks executed by the TG group elicited (1) more efficient brain activation pattern consistent with other studies that found less extensive activity with executing "over-learned" tasks; (2) "underactive" SMA activity that underlies reduced motor planning; (3) decreased inferior parietal activity that is associated with lesser motor-attentional demands. Thus orofacial parafunctional habits may influence brain circuits recruited for jaw movements, providing a possible basis for understanding involuntary jaw movements in bruxism and oral movement disorders in general.

AB - Jaw-clenching and tooth-grinding associated with bruxism can contribute to abnormal tooth wear and pain in the masticatory system. Clench and tooth-grinding jaw-movement tasks were evaluated in a block-design fMRI study comparing a dental-control (DC) group with a tooth-grinding (TG) group. Group classification was made prior to imaging based upon self-reported parafunctional clench and grind behavior and clinical evidence of abnormal tooth wear. Group differences in brain activation patterns were found for each task compared to the resting baseline. The DC group showed a more widely distributed pattern; more extensive activity in the supplementary motor area (SMA) proper that extended into the pre-SMA; and, for clench, activity in the left inferior parietal lobule (IPL). The DC group activated more than the TG subjects the left IPL for clench, and pre-SMA for grind. Neither task elicited more activity in the TG than DC subjects. Our group findings suggest that jaw-movement tasks executed by the TG group elicited (1) more efficient brain activation pattern consistent with other studies that found less extensive activity with executing "over-learned" tasks; (2) "underactive" SMA activity that underlies reduced motor planning; (3) decreased inferior parietal activity that is associated with lesser motor-attentional demands. Thus orofacial parafunctional habits may influence brain circuits recruited for jaw movements, providing a possible basis for understanding involuntary jaw movements in bruxism and oral movement disorders in general.

KW - Bruxism

KW - fMRI

KW - Involuntary movements

KW - Mastication

KW - Orofacial

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952992318&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952992318&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.01.096

DO - 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.01.096

M3 - Article

C2 - 21295015

AN - SCOPUS:79952992318

VL - 1383

SP - 206

EP - 217

JO - Brain Research

JF - Brain Research

SN - 0006-8993

ER -