Moving into green healthy housing

David E. Jacobs, ​Emily  ​Ahonen, Sherry L. Dixon, Samuel Dorevitch, Jill Breysse, Janet Smith, Anne Evens, Doborah Dobrez, Marjie Isaacson, Colin Murphy, Lorraine Conroy, Peter Levavi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Green building systems have proliferated but health outcomes and associated costs and benefits remain poorly understood. Objective: To compare health before and after families moved into new green healthy housing with a control group in traditionally repaired housing. Design and Setting: Mixed methods study in 3 Chicago housing developments. Participants: Public housing and low-income subsidized households (n = 325 apartments with 803 individuals). Main Outcome Measures: Self-reported health status, visual assessment of housing condition, indoor air sampling, and Medicaid expenditure and diagnostic data. Medicaid expenditures and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes were modeled using a generalized linear model with γ distribution and log-link. Results: Housing conditions and self-reported physical and mental health improved significantly in the green healthy housing study group compared with both the control group and the dilapidated public housing from which the residents moved, as did hay fever, headaches, sinusitis, angina, and respiratory allergy. Asthma severity measured by self-reported lost school/work days, disturbed sleep, and symptoms improved significantly, as did sadness, nervousness, restlessness, and child behavior. Medicaid data in this exploratory study were inconclusive and inconsistent with self-reported health outcomes and visual assessment data on housing quality but hold promise for future investigation. Possible sources of bias in the Medicaid data include older age in the study group, changes in Medicaid eligibility over time, controlling for Medicaid costs in an urban area, and the increased stress associated with moving, even if the move is into better housing. Conclusion: The mixed method approach employed here describes the complex relationships among self-reported health, housing conditions, environmental measures, and clinical data. Housing conditions and selfreported physical and mental health improved in green healthy housing. Health care cost savings in Medicaid due to improved housing could not be quantified here but hold promise for future investigations with larger cohorts over a longer follow-up period.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)345-354
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Public Health Management and Practice
Volume21
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Medicaid
Public Housing
Health
Health Expenditures
Mental Health
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Psychomotor Agitation
Control Groups
Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis
Cost Savings
Sinusitis
Child Behavior
International Classification of Diseases
Health Care Costs
Health Status
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Headache
Linear Models
Sleep
Hypersensitivity

Keywords

  • Asthma
  • Built environment
  • Energy conservation
  • Green construction
  • Health
  • Hope VI
  • Housing
  • Medicaid
  • Public housing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Jacobs, D. E., ​Ahonen, E., Dixon, S. L., Dorevitch, S., Breysse, J., Smith, J., ... Levavi, P. (2015). Moving into green healthy housing. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 21(4), 345-354. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000000047

Moving into green healthy housing. / Jacobs, David E.; ​Ahonen, ​Emily ; Dixon, Sherry L.; Dorevitch, Samuel; Breysse, Jill; Smith, Janet; Evens, Anne; Dobrez, Doborah; Isaacson, Marjie; Murphy, Colin; Conroy, Lorraine; Levavi, Peter.

In: Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, Vol. 21, No. 4, 01.01.2015, p. 345-354.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jacobs, DE, ​Ahonen, E, Dixon, SL, Dorevitch, S, Breysse, J, Smith, J, Evens, A, Dobrez, D, Isaacson, M, Murphy, C, Conroy, L & Levavi, P 2015, 'Moving into green healthy housing', Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 345-354. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000000047
Jacobs, David E. ; ​Ahonen, ​Emily  ; Dixon, Sherry L. ; Dorevitch, Samuel ; Breysse, Jill ; Smith, Janet ; Evens, Anne ; Dobrez, Doborah ; Isaacson, Marjie ; Murphy, Colin ; Conroy, Lorraine ; Levavi, Peter. / Moving into green healthy housing. In: Journal of Public Health Management and Practice. 2015 ; Vol. 21, No. 4. pp. 345-354.
@article{2ca9e53012c1437ea496dc3124473ebc,
title = "Moving into green healthy housing",
abstract = "Background: Green building systems have proliferated but health outcomes and associated costs and benefits remain poorly understood. Objective: To compare health before and after families moved into new green healthy housing with a control group in traditionally repaired housing. Design and Setting: Mixed methods study in 3 Chicago housing developments. Participants: Public housing and low-income subsidized households (n = 325 apartments with 803 individuals). Main Outcome Measures: Self-reported health status, visual assessment of housing condition, indoor air sampling, and Medicaid expenditure and diagnostic data. Medicaid expenditures and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes were modeled using a generalized linear model with γ distribution and log-link. Results: Housing conditions and self-reported physical and mental health improved significantly in the green healthy housing study group compared with both the control group and the dilapidated public housing from which the residents moved, as did hay fever, headaches, sinusitis, angina, and respiratory allergy. Asthma severity measured by self-reported lost school/work days, disturbed sleep, and symptoms improved significantly, as did sadness, nervousness, restlessness, and child behavior. Medicaid data in this exploratory study were inconclusive and inconsistent with self-reported health outcomes and visual assessment data on housing quality but hold promise for future investigation. Possible sources of bias in the Medicaid data include older age in the study group, changes in Medicaid eligibility over time, controlling for Medicaid costs in an urban area, and the increased stress associated with moving, even if the move is into better housing. Conclusion: The mixed method approach employed here describes the complex relationships among self-reported health, housing conditions, environmental measures, and clinical data. Housing conditions and selfreported physical and mental health improved in green healthy housing. Health care cost savings in Medicaid due to improved housing could not be quantified here but hold promise for future investigations with larger cohorts over a longer follow-up period.",
keywords = "Asthma, Built environment, Energy conservation, Green construction, Health, Hope VI, Housing, Medicaid, Public housing",
author = "Jacobs, {David E.} and ​Emily  ​Ahonen and Dixon, {Sherry L.} and Samuel Dorevitch and Jill Breysse and Janet Smith and Anne Evens and Doborah Dobrez and Marjie Isaacson and Colin Murphy and Lorraine Conroy and Peter Levavi",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/PHH.0000000000000047",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "345--354",
journal = "Journal of Public Health Management and Practice",
issn = "1078-4659",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Moving into green healthy housing

AU - Jacobs, David E.

AU - ​Ahonen, ​Emily 

AU - Dixon, Sherry L.

AU - Dorevitch, Samuel

AU - Breysse, Jill

AU - Smith, Janet

AU - Evens, Anne

AU - Dobrez, Doborah

AU - Isaacson, Marjie

AU - Murphy, Colin

AU - Conroy, Lorraine

AU - Levavi, Peter

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Background: Green building systems have proliferated but health outcomes and associated costs and benefits remain poorly understood. Objective: To compare health before and after families moved into new green healthy housing with a control group in traditionally repaired housing. Design and Setting: Mixed methods study in 3 Chicago housing developments. Participants: Public housing and low-income subsidized households (n = 325 apartments with 803 individuals). Main Outcome Measures: Self-reported health status, visual assessment of housing condition, indoor air sampling, and Medicaid expenditure and diagnostic data. Medicaid expenditures and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes were modeled using a generalized linear model with γ distribution and log-link. Results: Housing conditions and self-reported physical and mental health improved significantly in the green healthy housing study group compared with both the control group and the dilapidated public housing from which the residents moved, as did hay fever, headaches, sinusitis, angina, and respiratory allergy. Asthma severity measured by self-reported lost school/work days, disturbed sleep, and symptoms improved significantly, as did sadness, nervousness, restlessness, and child behavior. Medicaid data in this exploratory study were inconclusive and inconsistent with self-reported health outcomes and visual assessment data on housing quality but hold promise for future investigation. Possible sources of bias in the Medicaid data include older age in the study group, changes in Medicaid eligibility over time, controlling for Medicaid costs in an urban area, and the increased stress associated with moving, even if the move is into better housing. Conclusion: The mixed method approach employed here describes the complex relationships among self-reported health, housing conditions, environmental measures, and clinical data. Housing conditions and selfreported physical and mental health improved in green healthy housing. Health care cost savings in Medicaid due to improved housing could not be quantified here but hold promise for future investigations with larger cohorts over a longer follow-up period.

AB - Background: Green building systems have proliferated but health outcomes and associated costs and benefits remain poorly understood. Objective: To compare health before and after families moved into new green healthy housing with a control group in traditionally repaired housing. Design and Setting: Mixed methods study in 3 Chicago housing developments. Participants: Public housing and low-income subsidized households (n = 325 apartments with 803 individuals). Main Outcome Measures: Self-reported health status, visual assessment of housing condition, indoor air sampling, and Medicaid expenditure and diagnostic data. Medicaid expenditures and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes were modeled using a generalized linear model with γ distribution and log-link. Results: Housing conditions and self-reported physical and mental health improved significantly in the green healthy housing study group compared with both the control group and the dilapidated public housing from which the residents moved, as did hay fever, headaches, sinusitis, angina, and respiratory allergy. Asthma severity measured by self-reported lost school/work days, disturbed sleep, and symptoms improved significantly, as did sadness, nervousness, restlessness, and child behavior. Medicaid data in this exploratory study were inconclusive and inconsistent with self-reported health outcomes and visual assessment data on housing quality but hold promise for future investigation. Possible sources of bias in the Medicaid data include older age in the study group, changes in Medicaid eligibility over time, controlling for Medicaid costs in an urban area, and the increased stress associated with moving, even if the move is into better housing. Conclusion: The mixed method approach employed here describes the complex relationships among self-reported health, housing conditions, environmental measures, and clinical data. Housing conditions and selfreported physical and mental health improved in green healthy housing. Health care cost savings in Medicaid due to improved housing could not be quantified here but hold promise for future investigations with larger cohorts over a longer follow-up period.

KW - Asthma

KW - Built environment

KW - Energy conservation

KW - Green construction

KW - Health

KW - Hope VI

KW - Housing

KW - Medicaid

KW - Public housing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938084349&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938084349&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000047

DO - 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000047

M3 - Article

C2 - 24378632

AN - SCOPUS:84938084349

VL - 21

SP - 345

EP - 354

JO - Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

JF - Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

SN - 1078-4659

IS - 4

ER -