"Mr Smith's been our problem child today..."

Anticipatory management communication (AMC) in VA end-of-shift medicine and nursing handoffs

Alicia A. Bergman, Mindy E. Flanagan, Patricia R. Ebright, Colleen M. O'Brien, Richard Frankel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Tools and procedures designed to improve end-of-shift handoffs through standardisation of processes and reliance on technology may miss contextually sensitive information about anticipated events that emerges during face-to-face handoff interactions. Such information, what we refer to as anticipatory management communication (AMC), is necessary to ensure timely and safe patient care, but has been little studied and understood. Objective: To investigate AMC and the role it plays in nursing and medicine handoffs. Research design: Qualitative thematic analysis based on audio recordings of nurse-to-nurse, medical resident-to-resident and surgical internto-intern handoffs. Subjects: 27 nurse handoff dyads and 18 medical resident and surgical intern handoff dyads at one VA Medical Center. Results: Heads-up information was the most frequent type of AMC across all handoff dyads (N=257; 108 resident and 149 nursing). Indirect instructions AMC was used in a little over half the resident handoff dyads, but occurred in all nursing dyads (292 instances). Direct instructions AMC occurred in roughly equal proportion across all dyads but at a modest frequency (N=45; 28 resident and 17 nursing). Direct (if/then) contingency AMC occurred in resident handoffs more frequently than in nursing handoffs (N=32; 30 resident and 2 nursing). Conclusions: The different frequencies for types of AMC likely reflect differences in how residents and nurses work and disparate professional cultures. But, verbal communication in both groups included important information unlikely to be captured in written handoff tools or the electronic medical record, underscoring the importance of direct communication to ensure safe handoffs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)84-91
Number of pages8
JournalBMJ Quality and Safety
Volume25
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2016

Fingerprint

Nursing
Communication
Medicine
Nurses
Electronic Health Records
Patient Care
Research Design
Technology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

"Mr Smith's been our problem child today..." : Anticipatory management communication (AMC) in VA end-of-shift medicine and nursing handoffs. / Bergman, Alicia A.; Flanagan, Mindy E.; Ebright, Patricia R.; O'Brien, Colleen M.; Frankel, Richard.

In: BMJ Quality and Safety, Vol. 25, No. 2, 01.02.2016, p. 84-91.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bergman, Alicia A. ; Flanagan, Mindy E. ; Ebright, Patricia R. ; O'Brien, Colleen M. ; Frankel, Richard. / "Mr Smith's been our problem child today..." : Anticipatory management communication (AMC) in VA end-of-shift medicine and nursing handoffs. In: BMJ Quality and Safety. 2016 ; Vol. 25, No. 2. pp. 84-91.
@article{5ee14ef5e9bb42a580f60ad4dc9a05f8,
title = "{"}Mr Smith's been our problem child today...{"}: Anticipatory management communication (AMC) in VA end-of-shift medicine and nursing handoffs",
abstract = "Background: Tools and procedures designed to improve end-of-shift handoffs through standardisation of processes and reliance on technology may miss contextually sensitive information about anticipated events that emerges during face-to-face handoff interactions. Such information, what we refer to as anticipatory management communication (AMC), is necessary to ensure timely and safe patient care, but has been little studied and understood. Objective: To investigate AMC and the role it plays in nursing and medicine handoffs. Research design: Qualitative thematic analysis based on audio recordings of nurse-to-nurse, medical resident-to-resident and surgical internto-intern handoffs. Subjects: 27 nurse handoff dyads and 18 medical resident and surgical intern handoff dyads at one VA Medical Center. Results: Heads-up information was the most frequent type of AMC across all handoff dyads (N=257; 108 resident and 149 nursing). Indirect instructions AMC was used in a little over half the resident handoff dyads, but occurred in all nursing dyads (292 instances). Direct instructions AMC occurred in roughly equal proportion across all dyads but at a modest frequency (N=45; 28 resident and 17 nursing). Direct (if/then) contingency AMC occurred in resident handoffs more frequently than in nursing handoffs (N=32; 30 resident and 2 nursing). Conclusions: The different frequencies for types of AMC likely reflect differences in how residents and nurses work and disparate professional cultures. But, verbal communication in both groups included important information unlikely to be captured in written handoff tools or the electronic medical record, underscoring the importance of direct communication to ensure safe handoffs.",
author = "Bergman, {Alicia A.} and Flanagan, {Mindy E.} and Ebright, {Patricia R.} and O'Brien, {Colleen M.} and Richard Frankel",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003694",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "84--91",
journal = "BMJ Quality and Safety",
issn = "2044-5415",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - "Mr Smith's been our problem child today..."

T2 - Anticipatory management communication (AMC) in VA end-of-shift medicine and nursing handoffs

AU - Bergman, Alicia A.

AU - Flanagan, Mindy E.

AU - Ebright, Patricia R.

AU - O'Brien, Colleen M.

AU - Frankel, Richard

PY - 2016/2/1

Y1 - 2016/2/1

N2 - Background: Tools and procedures designed to improve end-of-shift handoffs through standardisation of processes and reliance on technology may miss contextually sensitive information about anticipated events that emerges during face-to-face handoff interactions. Such information, what we refer to as anticipatory management communication (AMC), is necessary to ensure timely and safe patient care, but has been little studied and understood. Objective: To investigate AMC and the role it plays in nursing and medicine handoffs. Research design: Qualitative thematic analysis based on audio recordings of nurse-to-nurse, medical resident-to-resident and surgical internto-intern handoffs. Subjects: 27 nurse handoff dyads and 18 medical resident and surgical intern handoff dyads at one VA Medical Center. Results: Heads-up information was the most frequent type of AMC across all handoff dyads (N=257; 108 resident and 149 nursing). Indirect instructions AMC was used in a little over half the resident handoff dyads, but occurred in all nursing dyads (292 instances). Direct instructions AMC occurred in roughly equal proportion across all dyads but at a modest frequency (N=45; 28 resident and 17 nursing). Direct (if/then) contingency AMC occurred in resident handoffs more frequently than in nursing handoffs (N=32; 30 resident and 2 nursing). Conclusions: The different frequencies for types of AMC likely reflect differences in how residents and nurses work and disparate professional cultures. But, verbal communication in both groups included important information unlikely to be captured in written handoff tools or the electronic medical record, underscoring the importance of direct communication to ensure safe handoffs.

AB - Background: Tools and procedures designed to improve end-of-shift handoffs through standardisation of processes and reliance on technology may miss contextually sensitive information about anticipated events that emerges during face-to-face handoff interactions. Such information, what we refer to as anticipatory management communication (AMC), is necessary to ensure timely and safe patient care, but has been little studied and understood. Objective: To investigate AMC and the role it plays in nursing and medicine handoffs. Research design: Qualitative thematic analysis based on audio recordings of nurse-to-nurse, medical resident-to-resident and surgical internto-intern handoffs. Subjects: 27 nurse handoff dyads and 18 medical resident and surgical intern handoff dyads at one VA Medical Center. Results: Heads-up information was the most frequent type of AMC across all handoff dyads (N=257; 108 resident and 149 nursing). Indirect instructions AMC was used in a little over half the resident handoff dyads, but occurred in all nursing dyads (292 instances). Direct instructions AMC occurred in roughly equal proportion across all dyads but at a modest frequency (N=45; 28 resident and 17 nursing). Direct (if/then) contingency AMC occurred in resident handoffs more frequently than in nursing handoffs (N=32; 30 resident and 2 nursing). Conclusions: The different frequencies for types of AMC likely reflect differences in how residents and nurses work and disparate professional cultures. But, verbal communication in both groups included important information unlikely to be captured in written handoff tools or the electronic medical record, underscoring the importance of direct communication to ensure safe handoffs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955257134&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84955257134&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003694

DO - 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003694

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 84

EP - 91

JO - BMJ Quality and Safety

JF - BMJ Quality and Safety

SN - 2044-5415

IS - 2

ER -