MRCP in patient care

A prospective survey of gastroenterologists

M. Akisik, S. Gregory Jennings, Alex M. Aisen, Stuart Sherman, Gregory A. Cote, Kumar Sandrasegaran, Temel Tirkes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. MRCP is increasingly used to evaluate pancreaticobiliary disease, yet its effect on patient care is unknown. The purpose of this study was to measure the effect of MRCP on referring physicians' initial diagnoses, the physicians' confidence in their diagnoses, and the influence of MRCP results on clinical management. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. We prospectively surveyed gastroenterologists who referred patients for nonurgent MRCP for pancreaticobiliary evaluation. Before MRCP, gastroenterologists reported the working diagnosis, confidence level (high, moderate, low), and next step in clinical management if MRCP was unavailable. MRCP was performed with standard protocols, including secretin enhancement. After reviewing MRCP findings and without referring to their previous assessment, gastroenterologists reported a revised diagnosis, confidence level, and next step in clinical management. They then compared pre- and post-MRCP management plans and rated the influence of MRCP on changing management from 1 (none) to 5 (major). Diagnostic confidence and frequency of common diagnoses and recommendation for an invasive next-step procedure (e.g., ERCP) or endoscopic ultrasound were compared between pre- and post-MRCP assessments. RESULTS. Survey data were analyzed on 171 patients (123 women, 48 men; mean age, 50 [SD, 17] years; range, 19-88 years) undergoing MRCP for unexplained abdominal pain (42.9%), suspected pancreaticobiliary neoplasm (20%), recent acute (17.1%) or suspected chronic (14.9%) pancreatitis, and other indications (5.1%). Recommendations of ERCP and endoscopic ultrasound decreased after MRCP (from 49.1% to 35.1%, p=0.03, and from 26.9% to 13.5%, p = 0.01). After MRCP, high confidence in diagnosis increased (from 72/171 to 100/171, p < 0.01), as did recommendations for noninvasive therapy (from 18/171 to 56/171, p < 0.01). A major or substantial change in clinical management was made in the care of 67 of 171 patients (39.2%). CONCLUSION. Use of MRCP significantly changes gastroenterologists' treatment of patients with suspected pancreaticobiliary disease by increasing diagnostic confidence and reducing the frequency of invasive follow-up procedures.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)573-577
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Roentgenology
Volume201
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2013

Fingerprint

Patient Care
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Physicians
Secretin
Chronic Pancreatitis
Abdominal Pain
Gastroenterologists
Surveys and Questionnaires
Therapeutics
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • MRCP
  • Practice patterns
  • Survey

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

MRCP in patient care : A prospective survey of gastroenterologists. / Akisik, M.; Jennings, S. Gregory; Aisen, Alex M.; Sherman, Stuart; Cote, Gregory A.; Sandrasegaran, Kumar; Tirkes, Temel.

In: American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 201, No. 3, 09.2013, p. 573-577.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ed05196f6b7e40e2b454fd96d312478e,
title = "MRCP in patient care: A prospective survey of gastroenterologists",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE. MRCP is increasingly used to evaluate pancreaticobiliary disease, yet its effect on patient care is unknown. The purpose of this study was to measure the effect of MRCP on referring physicians' initial diagnoses, the physicians' confidence in their diagnoses, and the influence of MRCP results on clinical management. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. We prospectively surveyed gastroenterologists who referred patients for nonurgent MRCP for pancreaticobiliary evaluation. Before MRCP, gastroenterologists reported the working diagnosis, confidence level (high, moderate, low), and next step in clinical management if MRCP was unavailable. MRCP was performed with standard protocols, including secretin enhancement. After reviewing MRCP findings and without referring to their previous assessment, gastroenterologists reported a revised diagnosis, confidence level, and next step in clinical management. They then compared pre- and post-MRCP management plans and rated the influence of MRCP on changing management from 1 (none) to 5 (major). Diagnostic confidence and frequency of common diagnoses and recommendation for an invasive next-step procedure (e.g., ERCP) or endoscopic ultrasound were compared between pre- and post-MRCP assessments. RESULTS. Survey data were analyzed on 171 patients (123 women, 48 men; mean age, 50 [SD, 17] years; range, 19-88 years) undergoing MRCP for unexplained abdominal pain (42.9{\%}), suspected pancreaticobiliary neoplasm (20{\%}), recent acute (17.1{\%}) or suspected chronic (14.9{\%}) pancreatitis, and other indications (5.1{\%}). Recommendations of ERCP and endoscopic ultrasound decreased after MRCP (from 49.1{\%} to 35.1{\%}, p=0.03, and from 26.9{\%} to 13.5{\%}, p = 0.01). After MRCP, high confidence in diagnosis increased (from 72/171 to 100/171, p < 0.01), as did recommendations for noninvasive therapy (from 18/171 to 56/171, p < 0.01). A major or substantial change in clinical management was made in the care of 67 of 171 patients (39.2{\%}). CONCLUSION. Use of MRCP significantly changes gastroenterologists' treatment of patients with suspected pancreaticobiliary disease by increasing diagnostic confidence and reducing the frequency of invasive follow-up procedures.",
keywords = "MRCP, Practice patterns, Survey",
author = "M. Akisik and Jennings, {S. Gregory} and Aisen, {Alex M.} and Stuart Sherman and Cote, {Gregory A.} and Kumar Sandrasegaran and Temel Tirkes",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
doi = "10.2214/AJR.12.9900",
language = "English",
volume = "201",
pages = "573--577",
journal = "American Journal of Roentgenology",
issn = "0361-803X",
publisher = "American Roentgen Ray Society",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - MRCP in patient care

T2 - A prospective survey of gastroenterologists

AU - Akisik, M.

AU - Jennings, S. Gregory

AU - Aisen, Alex M.

AU - Sherman, Stuart

AU - Cote, Gregory A.

AU - Sandrasegaran, Kumar

AU - Tirkes, Temel

PY - 2013/9

Y1 - 2013/9

N2 - OBJECTIVE. MRCP is increasingly used to evaluate pancreaticobiliary disease, yet its effect on patient care is unknown. The purpose of this study was to measure the effect of MRCP on referring physicians' initial diagnoses, the physicians' confidence in their diagnoses, and the influence of MRCP results on clinical management. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. We prospectively surveyed gastroenterologists who referred patients for nonurgent MRCP for pancreaticobiliary evaluation. Before MRCP, gastroenterologists reported the working diagnosis, confidence level (high, moderate, low), and next step in clinical management if MRCP was unavailable. MRCP was performed with standard protocols, including secretin enhancement. After reviewing MRCP findings and without referring to their previous assessment, gastroenterologists reported a revised diagnosis, confidence level, and next step in clinical management. They then compared pre- and post-MRCP management plans and rated the influence of MRCP on changing management from 1 (none) to 5 (major). Diagnostic confidence and frequency of common diagnoses and recommendation for an invasive next-step procedure (e.g., ERCP) or endoscopic ultrasound were compared between pre- and post-MRCP assessments. RESULTS. Survey data were analyzed on 171 patients (123 women, 48 men; mean age, 50 [SD, 17] years; range, 19-88 years) undergoing MRCP for unexplained abdominal pain (42.9%), suspected pancreaticobiliary neoplasm (20%), recent acute (17.1%) or suspected chronic (14.9%) pancreatitis, and other indications (5.1%). Recommendations of ERCP and endoscopic ultrasound decreased after MRCP (from 49.1% to 35.1%, p=0.03, and from 26.9% to 13.5%, p = 0.01). After MRCP, high confidence in diagnosis increased (from 72/171 to 100/171, p < 0.01), as did recommendations for noninvasive therapy (from 18/171 to 56/171, p < 0.01). A major or substantial change in clinical management was made in the care of 67 of 171 patients (39.2%). CONCLUSION. Use of MRCP significantly changes gastroenterologists' treatment of patients with suspected pancreaticobiliary disease by increasing diagnostic confidence and reducing the frequency of invasive follow-up procedures.

AB - OBJECTIVE. MRCP is increasingly used to evaluate pancreaticobiliary disease, yet its effect on patient care is unknown. The purpose of this study was to measure the effect of MRCP on referring physicians' initial diagnoses, the physicians' confidence in their diagnoses, and the influence of MRCP results on clinical management. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. We prospectively surveyed gastroenterologists who referred patients for nonurgent MRCP for pancreaticobiliary evaluation. Before MRCP, gastroenterologists reported the working diagnosis, confidence level (high, moderate, low), and next step in clinical management if MRCP was unavailable. MRCP was performed with standard protocols, including secretin enhancement. After reviewing MRCP findings and without referring to their previous assessment, gastroenterologists reported a revised diagnosis, confidence level, and next step in clinical management. They then compared pre- and post-MRCP management plans and rated the influence of MRCP on changing management from 1 (none) to 5 (major). Diagnostic confidence and frequency of common diagnoses and recommendation for an invasive next-step procedure (e.g., ERCP) or endoscopic ultrasound were compared between pre- and post-MRCP assessments. RESULTS. Survey data were analyzed on 171 patients (123 women, 48 men; mean age, 50 [SD, 17] years; range, 19-88 years) undergoing MRCP for unexplained abdominal pain (42.9%), suspected pancreaticobiliary neoplasm (20%), recent acute (17.1%) or suspected chronic (14.9%) pancreatitis, and other indications (5.1%). Recommendations of ERCP and endoscopic ultrasound decreased after MRCP (from 49.1% to 35.1%, p=0.03, and from 26.9% to 13.5%, p = 0.01). After MRCP, high confidence in diagnosis increased (from 72/171 to 100/171, p < 0.01), as did recommendations for noninvasive therapy (from 18/171 to 56/171, p < 0.01). A major or substantial change in clinical management was made in the care of 67 of 171 patients (39.2%). CONCLUSION. Use of MRCP significantly changes gastroenterologists' treatment of patients with suspected pancreaticobiliary disease by increasing diagnostic confidence and reducing the frequency of invasive follow-up procedures.

KW - MRCP

KW - Practice patterns

KW - Survey

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884617780&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884617780&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2214/AJR.12.9900

DO - 10.2214/AJR.12.9900

M3 - Article

VL - 201

SP - 573

EP - 577

JO - American Journal of Roentgenology

JF - American Journal of Roentgenology

SN - 0361-803X

IS - 3

ER -