MRI scanners and the stapes prosthesis

Michael H. Fritsch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Physicians and patients alike have concerns regarding exposing in vivo implanted metal stapes prostheses to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners. As MRI scanners become more powerful, the possibility for stapes prosthesis displacement due to ferromagnetic forces increases. It is hypothesized that some metal stapes prostheses may be exposed to powerful MRI scanners without leading to potential adversities for patients. STUDY DESIGN: Literature review, retrospective case review, and physician survey. SETTINGS: Tertiary care, University Medical Center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A review of the medical literature,a retrospective case review, and a clinical survey were performed. RESULTS: In the history of stapes prostheses, 1 adverse patient outcome was causally substantiated when a defective stapes prosthesis was exposed to an MRI field. Otherwise, a review of the literature on experiments investigating stapes prostheses and MRI fields revealed a lack of any adverse clinical reports. In addition, 2 physician's surveys revealed no other cases of symptoms or damage to the ears of patients with stapes prostheses that had been exposed to an MRI scanner. CONCLUSION: All patients with a metallic stapes prosthesis may be sent to the MRI scanner, with the exception of 1 specific defective prosthesis type. The exception is a 1987 accidental mismanufacture of several lots of McGee pistons with a magnetic alloy. Patients with these specifically identified lots of McGee pistons should go to a computed tomographic scanner or be reimplanted with another prosthesis if MRI scans are mandatory. It would be advisable for manufacturers to use nonferromagnetic metals such as titanium for production of future stapes prostheses.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)733-738
Number of pages6
JournalOtology and Neurotology
Volume28
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2007

Fingerprint

Stapes
Prostheses and Implants
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Metals
Physicians
Tertiary Healthcare
Titanium
Ear
History

Keywords

  • Magnetic
  • MRI scan
  • Otosclerosis
  • Prosthesis
  • Stapes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

MRI scanners and the stapes prosthesis. / Fritsch, Michael H.

In: Otology and Neurotology, Vol. 28, No. 6, 09.2007, p. 733-738.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fritsch, Michael H. / MRI scanners and the stapes prosthesis. In: Otology and Neurotology. 2007 ; Vol. 28, No. 6. pp. 733-738.
@article{18e6e8ff2b8944ee8abc72a442472c82,
title = "MRI scanners and the stapes prosthesis",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: Physicians and patients alike have concerns regarding exposing in vivo implanted metal stapes prostheses to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners. As MRI scanners become more powerful, the possibility for stapes prosthesis displacement due to ferromagnetic forces increases. It is hypothesized that some metal stapes prostheses may be exposed to powerful MRI scanners without leading to potential adversities for patients. STUDY DESIGN: Literature review, retrospective case review, and physician survey. SETTINGS: Tertiary care, University Medical Center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A review of the medical literature,a retrospective case review, and a clinical survey were performed. RESULTS: In the history of stapes prostheses, 1 adverse patient outcome was causally substantiated when a defective stapes prosthesis was exposed to an MRI field. Otherwise, a review of the literature on experiments investigating stapes prostheses and MRI fields revealed a lack of any adverse clinical reports. In addition, 2 physician's surveys revealed no other cases of symptoms or damage to the ears of patients with stapes prostheses that had been exposed to an MRI scanner. CONCLUSION: All patients with a metallic stapes prosthesis may be sent to the MRI scanner, with the exception of 1 specific defective prosthesis type. The exception is a 1987 accidental mismanufacture of several lots of McGee pistons with a magnetic alloy. Patients with these specifically identified lots of McGee pistons should go to a computed tomographic scanner or be reimplanted with another prosthesis if MRI scans are mandatory. It would be advisable for manufacturers to use nonferromagnetic metals such as titanium for production of future stapes prostheses.",
keywords = "Magnetic, MRI scan, Otosclerosis, Prosthesis, Stapes",
author = "Fritsch, {Michael H.}",
year = "2007",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1097/MAO.0b013e318125652a",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "733--738",
journal = "Otology and Neurotology",
issn = "1531-7129",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - MRI scanners and the stapes prosthesis

AU - Fritsch, Michael H.

PY - 2007/9

Y1 - 2007/9

N2 - OBJECTIVE: Physicians and patients alike have concerns regarding exposing in vivo implanted metal stapes prostheses to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners. As MRI scanners become more powerful, the possibility for stapes prosthesis displacement due to ferromagnetic forces increases. It is hypothesized that some metal stapes prostheses may be exposed to powerful MRI scanners without leading to potential adversities for patients. STUDY DESIGN: Literature review, retrospective case review, and physician survey. SETTINGS: Tertiary care, University Medical Center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A review of the medical literature,a retrospective case review, and a clinical survey were performed. RESULTS: In the history of stapes prostheses, 1 adverse patient outcome was causally substantiated when a defective stapes prosthesis was exposed to an MRI field. Otherwise, a review of the literature on experiments investigating stapes prostheses and MRI fields revealed a lack of any adverse clinical reports. In addition, 2 physician's surveys revealed no other cases of symptoms or damage to the ears of patients with stapes prostheses that had been exposed to an MRI scanner. CONCLUSION: All patients with a metallic stapes prosthesis may be sent to the MRI scanner, with the exception of 1 specific defective prosthesis type. The exception is a 1987 accidental mismanufacture of several lots of McGee pistons with a magnetic alloy. Patients with these specifically identified lots of McGee pistons should go to a computed tomographic scanner or be reimplanted with another prosthesis if MRI scans are mandatory. It would be advisable for manufacturers to use nonferromagnetic metals such as titanium for production of future stapes prostheses.

AB - OBJECTIVE: Physicians and patients alike have concerns regarding exposing in vivo implanted metal stapes prostheses to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners. As MRI scanners become more powerful, the possibility for stapes prosthesis displacement due to ferromagnetic forces increases. It is hypothesized that some metal stapes prostheses may be exposed to powerful MRI scanners without leading to potential adversities for patients. STUDY DESIGN: Literature review, retrospective case review, and physician survey. SETTINGS: Tertiary care, University Medical Center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A review of the medical literature,a retrospective case review, and a clinical survey were performed. RESULTS: In the history of stapes prostheses, 1 adverse patient outcome was causally substantiated when a defective stapes prosthesis was exposed to an MRI field. Otherwise, a review of the literature on experiments investigating stapes prostheses and MRI fields revealed a lack of any adverse clinical reports. In addition, 2 physician's surveys revealed no other cases of symptoms or damage to the ears of patients with stapes prostheses that had been exposed to an MRI scanner. CONCLUSION: All patients with a metallic stapes prosthesis may be sent to the MRI scanner, with the exception of 1 specific defective prosthesis type. The exception is a 1987 accidental mismanufacture of several lots of McGee pistons with a magnetic alloy. Patients with these specifically identified lots of McGee pistons should go to a computed tomographic scanner or be reimplanted with another prosthesis if MRI scans are mandatory. It would be advisable for manufacturers to use nonferromagnetic metals such as titanium for production of future stapes prostheses.

KW - Magnetic

KW - MRI scan

KW - Otosclerosis

KW - Prosthesis

KW - Stapes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548271056&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548271056&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318125652a

DO - 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318125652a

M3 - Article

C2 - 17948354

AN - SCOPUS:34548271056

VL - 28

SP - 733

EP - 738

JO - Otology and Neurotology

JF - Otology and Neurotology

SN - 1531-7129

IS - 6

ER -