Multicenter comparison of the interobserver agreement of standard EUS scoring and Rosemont classification scoring for diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis

Tyler Stevens, Rocio Lopez, Douglas G. Adler, Mohammad A. Al-Haddad, Jason Conway, John DeWitt, Chris E. Forsmark, Michel Kahaleh, Linda S. Lee, Michael J. Levy, Girish Mishra, Cyrus R. Piraka, Georgios I. Papachristou, Raj J. Shah, Mark D. Topazian, John J. Vargo, Stacie A. Vela

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

70 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: EUS has less than optimal interobserver agreement for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. The newly developed Rosemont consensus scoring system includes weighted criteria and stricter definitions for individual features. Objective: The primary aim was to compare the interobserver agreement of standard and Rosemont scoring. Setting: Multiple tertiary-care institutions. Intervention: Fifty EUS videos were interpreted by 14 experts. Each expert interpreted the videos on two occasions: First, the videos were read by using standard scoring (9 criteria). Second, after viewing a presentation of the Rosemont classification, the same experts re-read the videos by using Rosemont scoring. Main Outcome Measurements: Fleiss' kappa (K) statistics are reported with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: The interobserver agreement was "substantial" (K = 0.65 [95% CI, 0.52-0.77]) for Rosemont scoring and "moderate" (K = 0.54 [95% CI, 0.44-0.66]) for standard scoring; however, the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.12). Limitations: The sample size does not allow detection of differences in K of

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)519-526
Number of pages8
JournalGastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume71
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Chronic Pancreatitis
Confidence Intervals
Tertiary Healthcare
Sample Size

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Multicenter comparison of the interobserver agreement of standard EUS scoring and Rosemont classification scoring for diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. / Stevens, Tyler; Lopez, Rocio; Adler, Douglas G.; Al-Haddad, Mohammad A.; Conway, Jason; DeWitt, John; Forsmark, Chris E.; Kahaleh, Michel; Lee, Linda S.; Levy, Michael J.; Mishra, Girish; Piraka, Cyrus R.; Papachristou, Georgios I.; Shah, Raj J.; Topazian, Mark D.; Vargo, John J.; Vela, Stacie A.

In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Vol. 71, No. 3, 03.2010, p. 519-526.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stevens, T, Lopez, R, Adler, DG, Al-Haddad, MA, Conway, J, DeWitt, J, Forsmark, CE, Kahaleh, M, Lee, LS, Levy, MJ, Mishra, G, Piraka, CR, Papachristou, GI, Shah, RJ, Topazian, MD, Vargo, JJ & Vela, SA 2010, 'Multicenter comparison of the interobserver agreement of standard EUS scoring and Rosemont classification scoring for diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis', Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 519-526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.043
Stevens, Tyler ; Lopez, Rocio ; Adler, Douglas G. ; Al-Haddad, Mohammad A. ; Conway, Jason ; DeWitt, John ; Forsmark, Chris E. ; Kahaleh, Michel ; Lee, Linda S. ; Levy, Michael J. ; Mishra, Girish ; Piraka, Cyrus R. ; Papachristou, Georgios I. ; Shah, Raj J. ; Topazian, Mark D. ; Vargo, John J. ; Vela, Stacie A. / Multicenter comparison of the interobserver agreement of standard EUS scoring and Rosemont classification scoring for diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2010 ; Vol. 71, No. 3. pp. 519-526.
@article{2466c9ed311e430cb2ff7a3fdc68ab4b,
title = "Multicenter comparison of the interobserver agreement of standard EUS scoring and Rosemont classification scoring for diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis",
abstract = "Background: EUS has less than optimal interobserver agreement for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. The newly developed Rosemont consensus scoring system includes weighted criteria and stricter definitions for individual features. Objective: The primary aim was to compare the interobserver agreement of standard and Rosemont scoring. Setting: Multiple tertiary-care institutions. Intervention: Fifty EUS videos were interpreted by 14 experts. Each expert interpreted the videos on two occasions: First, the videos were read by using standard scoring (9 criteria). Second, after viewing a presentation of the Rosemont classification, the same experts re-read the videos by using Rosemont scoring. Main Outcome Measurements: Fleiss' kappa (K) statistics are reported with 95{\%} confidence intervals (CI). Results: The interobserver agreement was {"}substantial{"} (K = 0.65 [95{\%} CI, 0.52-0.77]) for Rosemont scoring and {"}moderate{"} (K = 0.54 [95{\%} CI, 0.44-0.66]) for standard scoring; however, the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.12). Limitations: The sample size does not allow detection of differences in K of",
author = "Tyler Stevens and Rocio Lopez and Adler, {Douglas G.} and Al-Haddad, {Mohammad A.} and Jason Conway and John DeWitt and Forsmark, {Chris E.} and Michel Kahaleh and Lee, {Linda S.} and Levy, {Michael J.} and Girish Mishra and Piraka, {Cyrus R.} and Papachristou, {Georgios I.} and Shah, {Raj J.} and Topazian, {Mark D.} and Vargo, {John J.} and Vela, {Stacie A.}",
year = "2010",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.043",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "71",
pages = "519--526",
journal = "Gastrointestinal Endoscopy",
issn = "0016-5107",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multicenter comparison of the interobserver agreement of standard EUS scoring and Rosemont classification scoring for diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis

AU - Stevens, Tyler

AU - Lopez, Rocio

AU - Adler, Douglas G.

AU - Al-Haddad, Mohammad A.

AU - Conway, Jason

AU - DeWitt, John

AU - Forsmark, Chris E.

AU - Kahaleh, Michel

AU - Lee, Linda S.

AU - Levy, Michael J.

AU - Mishra, Girish

AU - Piraka, Cyrus R.

AU - Papachristou, Georgios I.

AU - Shah, Raj J.

AU - Topazian, Mark D.

AU - Vargo, John J.

AU - Vela, Stacie A.

PY - 2010/3

Y1 - 2010/3

N2 - Background: EUS has less than optimal interobserver agreement for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. The newly developed Rosemont consensus scoring system includes weighted criteria and stricter definitions for individual features. Objective: The primary aim was to compare the interobserver agreement of standard and Rosemont scoring. Setting: Multiple tertiary-care institutions. Intervention: Fifty EUS videos were interpreted by 14 experts. Each expert interpreted the videos on two occasions: First, the videos were read by using standard scoring (9 criteria). Second, after viewing a presentation of the Rosemont classification, the same experts re-read the videos by using Rosemont scoring. Main Outcome Measurements: Fleiss' kappa (K) statistics are reported with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: The interobserver agreement was "substantial" (K = 0.65 [95% CI, 0.52-0.77]) for Rosemont scoring and "moderate" (K = 0.54 [95% CI, 0.44-0.66]) for standard scoring; however, the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.12). Limitations: The sample size does not allow detection of differences in K of

AB - Background: EUS has less than optimal interobserver agreement for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. The newly developed Rosemont consensus scoring system includes weighted criteria and stricter definitions for individual features. Objective: The primary aim was to compare the interobserver agreement of standard and Rosemont scoring. Setting: Multiple tertiary-care institutions. Intervention: Fifty EUS videos were interpreted by 14 experts. Each expert interpreted the videos on two occasions: First, the videos were read by using standard scoring (9 criteria). Second, after viewing a presentation of the Rosemont classification, the same experts re-read the videos by using Rosemont scoring. Main Outcome Measurements: Fleiss' kappa (K) statistics are reported with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: The interobserver agreement was "substantial" (K = 0.65 [95% CI, 0.52-0.77]) for Rosemont scoring and "moderate" (K = 0.54 [95% CI, 0.44-0.66]) for standard scoring; however, the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.12). Limitations: The sample size does not allow detection of differences in K of

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77449090226&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77449090226&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.043

DO - 10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.043

M3 - Article

C2 - 20189510

AN - SCOPUS:77449090226

VL - 71

SP - 519

EP - 526

JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

SN - 0016-5107

IS - 3

ER -