Multicystic dysplastic kidney

Is an initial voiding cystourethrogram necessary?

Adam C. Calaway, Benjamin Whittam, Konrad Szymanski, Rosalia Misseri, Martin Kaefer, Richard C. Rink, Boaz Karymazn, Mark P. Cain

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Traditionally, a voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) has been obtained in patients diagnosed with multicystic dysplastic kidney (MCDK) because of published vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) rates between 10%-20%. However, with the diagnosis and treatment of low grade VUR undergoing significant changes, we questioned the utility of obtaining a VCUG in healthy patients with a MCDK. We reviewed our experience to see how many of the patients with documented VUR required surgical intervention. Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective review of children diagnosed with unilateral MCDK from 2002 to 2012 who also underwent a VCUG. Results: A total of 133 patients met our inclusion criteria. VUR was identified in 23 (17.3%) children. Four patients underwent ureteral reimplant (3.0%). Indications for surgical therapy included breakthrough urinary tract infections (2 patients), evidence of dysplasia/ scarring (1 patient) and non-resolving reflux (1 patient). All patients with a history of VUR who are toilet trained, regardless of the grade or treatment, are currently being followed off antibiotic prophylaxis. To date, none have had a febrile urinary tract infection (UTI) since cessation of prophylactic antibiotics. Hydronephrosis in the contralateral kidney was not predictive of VUR (p = 0.99). Conclusion: Routine VCUG in healthy children diagnosed with unilateral MCDK may not be warranted given the low incidence of clinically significant VUR. If a more conservative strategy is preferred, routine VCUG may be withheld in those children without normal kidney hydronephrosis and considered in patients with normal kidney hydronephrosis. If a VCUG is not performed the family should be instructed in signs and symptoms of urinary tract infection.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)7510-7514
Number of pages5
JournalCanadian Journal of Urology
Volume21
Issue number5
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Multicystic Dysplastic Kidney
Vesico-Ureteral Reflux
Hydronephrosis
Urinary Tract Infections
Kidney
Antibiotic Prophylaxis
Signs and Symptoms
Cicatrix
Fever
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Multicystic dysplastic kidney
  • Vesicoureteral reflux
  • Voiding cystourethrogram

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Multicystic dysplastic kidney : Is an initial voiding cystourethrogram necessary? / Calaway, Adam C.; Whittam, Benjamin; Szymanski, Konrad; Misseri, Rosalia; Kaefer, Martin; Rink, Richard C.; Karymazn, Boaz; Cain, Mark P.

In: Canadian Journal of Urology, Vol. 21, No. 5, 2014, p. 7510-7514.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Calaway, AC, Whittam, B, Szymanski, K, Misseri, R, Kaefer, M, Rink, RC, Karymazn, B & Cain, MP 2014, 'Multicystic dysplastic kidney: Is an initial voiding cystourethrogram necessary?', Canadian Journal of Urology, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 7510-7514.
Calaway, Adam C. ; Whittam, Benjamin ; Szymanski, Konrad ; Misseri, Rosalia ; Kaefer, Martin ; Rink, Richard C. ; Karymazn, Boaz ; Cain, Mark P. / Multicystic dysplastic kidney : Is an initial voiding cystourethrogram necessary?. In: Canadian Journal of Urology. 2014 ; Vol. 21, No. 5. pp. 7510-7514.
@article{0c3c1f4c9f124079a224d46ff1b6d61d,
title = "Multicystic dysplastic kidney: Is an initial voiding cystourethrogram necessary?",
abstract = "Introduction: Traditionally, a voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) has been obtained in patients diagnosed with multicystic dysplastic kidney (MCDK) because of published vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) rates between 10{\%}-20{\%}. However, with the diagnosis and treatment of low grade VUR undergoing significant changes, we questioned the utility of obtaining a VCUG in healthy patients with a MCDK. We reviewed our experience to see how many of the patients with documented VUR required surgical intervention. Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective review of children diagnosed with unilateral MCDK from 2002 to 2012 who also underwent a VCUG. Results: A total of 133 patients met our inclusion criteria. VUR was identified in 23 (17.3{\%}) children. Four patients underwent ureteral reimplant (3.0{\%}). Indications for surgical therapy included breakthrough urinary tract infections (2 patients), evidence of dysplasia/ scarring (1 patient) and non-resolving reflux (1 patient). All patients with a history of VUR who are toilet trained, regardless of the grade or treatment, are currently being followed off antibiotic prophylaxis. To date, none have had a febrile urinary tract infection (UTI) since cessation of prophylactic antibiotics. Hydronephrosis in the contralateral kidney was not predictive of VUR (p = 0.99). Conclusion: Routine VCUG in healthy children diagnosed with unilateral MCDK may not be warranted given the low incidence of clinically significant VUR. If a more conservative strategy is preferred, routine VCUG may be withheld in those children without normal kidney hydronephrosis and considered in patients with normal kidney hydronephrosis. If a VCUG is not performed the family should be instructed in signs and symptoms of urinary tract infection.",
keywords = "Multicystic dysplastic kidney, Vesicoureteral reflux, Voiding cystourethrogram",
author = "Calaway, {Adam C.} and Benjamin Whittam and Konrad Szymanski and Rosalia Misseri and Martin Kaefer and Rink, {Richard C.} and Boaz Karymazn and Cain, {Mark P.}",
year = "2014",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "7510--7514",
journal = "Canadian Journal of Urology",
issn = "1195-9479",
publisher = "Canadian Journal of Urology",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multicystic dysplastic kidney

T2 - Is an initial voiding cystourethrogram necessary?

AU - Calaway, Adam C.

AU - Whittam, Benjamin

AU - Szymanski, Konrad

AU - Misseri, Rosalia

AU - Kaefer, Martin

AU - Rink, Richard C.

AU - Karymazn, Boaz

AU - Cain, Mark P.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Introduction: Traditionally, a voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) has been obtained in patients diagnosed with multicystic dysplastic kidney (MCDK) because of published vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) rates between 10%-20%. However, with the diagnosis and treatment of low grade VUR undergoing significant changes, we questioned the utility of obtaining a VCUG in healthy patients with a MCDK. We reviewed our experience to see how many of the patients with documented VUR required surgical intervention. Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective review of children diagnosed with unilateral MCDK from 2002 to 2012 who also underwent a VCUG. Results: A total of 133 patients met our inclusion criteria. VUR was identified in 23 (17.3%) children. Four patients underwent ureteral reimplant (3.0%). Indications for surgical therapy included breakthrough urinary tract infections (2 patients), evidence of dysplasia/ scarring (1 patient) and non-resolving reflux (1 patient). All patients with a history of VUR who are toilet trained, regardless of the grade or treatment, are currently being followed off antibiotic prophylaxis. To date, none have had a febrile urinary tract infection (UTI) since cessation of prophylactic antibiotics. Hydronephrosis in the contralateral kidney was not predictive of VUR (p = 0.99). Conclusion: Routine VCUG in healthy children diagnosed with unilateral MCDK may not be warranted given the low incidence of clinically significant VUR. If a more conservative strategy is preferred, routine VCUG may be withheld in those children without normal kidney hydronephrosis and considered in patients with normal kidney hydronephrosis. If a VCUG is not performed the family should be instructed in signs and symptoms of urinary tract infection.

AB - Introduction: Traditionally, a voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) has been obtained in patients diagnosed with multicystic dysplastic kidney (MCDK) because of published vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) rates between 10%-20%. However, with the diagnosis and treatment of low grade VUR undergoing significant changes, we questioned the utility of obtaining a VCUG in healthy patients with a MCDK. We reviewed our experience to see how many of the patients with documented VUR required surgical intervention. Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective review of children diagnosed with unilateral MCDK from 2002 to 2012 who also underwent a VCUG. Results: A total of 133 patients met our inclusion criteria. VUR was identified in 23 (17.3%) children. Four patients underwent ureteral reimplant (3.0%). Indications for surgical therapy included breakthrough urinary tract infections (2 patients), evidence of dysplasia/ scarring (1 patient) and non-resolving reflux (1 patient). All patients with a history of VUR who are toilet trained, regardless of the grade or treatment, are currently being followed off antibiotic prophylaxis. To date, none have had a febrile urinary tract infection (UTI) since cessation of prophylactic antibiotics. Hydronephrosis in the contralateral kidney was not predictive of VUR (p = 0.99). Conclusion: Routine VCUG in healthy children diagnosed with unilateral MCDK may not be warranted given the low incidence of clinically significant VUR. If a more conservative strategy is preferred, routine VCUG may be withheld in those children without normal kidney hydronephrosis and considered in patients with normal kidney hydronephrosis. If a VCUG is not performed the family should be instructed in signs and symptoms of urinary tract infection.

KW - Multicystic dysplastic kidney

KW - Vesicoureteral reflux

KW - Voiding cystourethrogram

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84910071341&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84910071341&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 7510

EP - 7514

JO - Canadian Journal of Urology

JF - Canadian Journal of Urology

SN - 1195-9479

IS - 5

ER -