Multistate analysis of factors associated with intimate partner violence

Joshua R. Vest, Tegan K. Catlin, John J. Chen, Ross C. Brownson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

195 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Reports on prevalence estimates and risk factors of intimate partner violence (IPV) are limited in that they (1) focus on specific subgroup populations that are not representative of all women or (2) involve long questionnaires that are not useful as surveillance tools. Objectives: To report prevalence estimates and identify demographic and lifestyle factors associated with IPV in a large population-based sample of U.S. women using surveillance data. Methods: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data from eight U.S. states were analyzed individually and as a pooled sample (N=18,415). Multivariate logistic regression models were used to examine associations between IPV and the factors of interest.Results: Factors consistently associated with IPV across the majority of states and in the pooled analysis included young age (pooled adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.07), single marital status (pooled aOR, 2.89), divorced/separated marital status (pooled aOR, 4.67), and annual household income <$25,000 (pooled aOR, 1.89). In addition, lack of health insurance, receipt of Medicaid, cigarette smoking, presence of children in the home, self-reported fair/poor health, and frequent mental distress were associated with IPV after adjustment for covariates. Conclusions: This study provides population-based estimates of IPV prevalence and factors associated with IPV using surveillance data. By pooling BRFSS data from individual states, the resulting large sample has adequate power to detect significant associations and has increased precision in the estimates of IPV risk. In addition, this study identifies high-risk populations to target for education and intervention programs and demonstrates the need for improved IPV surveillance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)156-164
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine
Volume22
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 20 2002

Fingerprint

Statistical Factor Analysis
Odds Ratio
Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Marital Status
Logistic Models
Health Fairs
Population
Intimate Partner Violence
Divorce
Health Services Needs and Demand
Medicaid
Health Insurance
Life Style
Mental Health
Smoking
Demography
Education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Multistate analysis of factors associated with intimate partner violence. / Vest, Joshua R.; Catlin, Tegan K.; Chen, John J.; Brownson, Ross C.

In: American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Vol. 22, No. 3, 20.03.2002, p. 156-164.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Vest, Joshua R. ; Catlin, Tegan K. ; Chen, John J. ; Brownson, Ross C. / Multistate analysis of factors associated with intimate partner violence. In: American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2002 ; Vol. 22, No. 3. pp. 156-164.
@article{5c1cbf877e984db692c458d6d3ffbf72,
title = "Multistate analysis of factors associated with intimate partner violence",
abstract = "Background: Reports on prevalence estimates and risk factors of intimate partner violence (IPV) are limited in that they (1) focus on specific subgroup populations that are not representative of all women or (2) involve long questionnaires that are not useful as surveillance tools. Objectives: To report prevalence estimates and identify demographic and lifestyle factors associated with IPV in a large population-based sample of U.S. women using surveillance data. Methods: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data from eight U.S. states were analyzed individually and as a pooled sample (N=18,415). Multivariate logistic regression models were used to examine associations between IPV and the factors of interest.Results: Factors consistently associated with IPV across the majority of states and in the pooled analysis included young age (pooled adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.07), single marital status (pooled aOR, 2.89), divorced/separated marital status (pooled aOR, 4.67), and annual household income <$25,000 (pooled aOR, 1.89). In addition, lack of health insurance, receipt of Medicaid, cigarette smoking, presence of children in the home, self-reported fair/poor health, and frequent mental distress were associated with IPV after adjustment for covariates. Conclusions: This study provides population-based estimates of IPV prevalence and factors associated with IPV using surveillance data. By pooling BRFSS data from individual states, the resulting large sample has adequate power to detect significant associations and has increased precision in the estimates of IPV risk. In addition, this study identifies high-risk populations to target for education and intervention programs and demonstrates the need for improved IPV surveillance.",
author = "Vest, {Joshua R.} and Catlin, {Tegan K.} and Chen, {John J.} and Brownson, {Ross C.}",
year = "2002",
month = "3",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1016/S0749-3797(01)00431-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "156--164",
journal = "American Journal of Preventive Medicine",
issn = "0749-3797",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multistate analysis of factors associated with intimate partner violence

AU - Vest, Joshua R.

AU - Catlin, Tegan K.

AU - Chen, John J.

AU - Brownson, Ross C.

PY - 2002/3/20

Y1 - 2002/3/20

N2 - Background: Reports on prevalence estimates and risk factors of intimate partner violence (IPV) are limited in that they (1) focus on specific subgroup populations that are not representative of all women or (2) involve long questionnaires that are not useful as surveillance tools. Objectives: To report prevalence estimates and identify demographic and lifestyle factors associated with IPV in a large population-based sample of U.S. women using surveillance data. Methods: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data from eight U.S. states were analyzed individually and as a pooled sample (N=18,415). Multivariate logistic regression models were used to examine associations between IPV and the factors of interest.Results: Factors consistently associated with IPV across the majority of states and in the pooled analysis included young age (pooled adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.07), single marital status (pooled aOR, 2.89), divorced/separated marital status (pooled aOR, 4.67), and annual household income <$25,000 (pooled aOR, 1.89). In addition, lack of health insurance, receipt of Medicaid, cigarette smoking, presence of children in the home, self-reported fair/poor health, and frequent mental distress were associated with IPV after adjustment for covariates. Conclusions: This study provides population-based estimates of IPV prevalence and factors associated with IPV using surveillance data. By pooling BRFSS data from individual states, the resulting large sample has adequate power to detect significant associations and has increased precision in the estimates of IPV risk. In addition, this study identifies high-risk populations to target for education and intervention programs and demonstrates the need for improved IPV surveillance.

AB - Background: Reports on prevalence estimates and risk factors of intimate partner violence (IPV) are limited in that they (1) focus on specific subgroup populations that are not representative of all women or (2) involve long questionnaires that are not useful as surveillance tools. Objectives: To report prevalence estimates and identify demographic and lifestyle factors associated with IPV in a large population-based sample of U.S. women using surveillance data. Methods: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data from eight U.S. states were analyzed individually and as a pooled sample (N=18,415). Multivariate logistic regression models were used to examine associations between IPV and the factors of interest.Results: Factors consistently associated with IPV across the majority of states and in the pooled analysis included young age (pooled adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.07), single marital status (pooled aOR, 2.89), divorced/separated marital status (pooled aOR, 4.67), and annual household income <$25,000 (pooled aOR, 1.89). In addition, lack of health insurance, receipt of Medicaid, cigarette smoking, presence of children in the home, self-reported fair/poor health, and frequent mental distress were associated with IPV after adjustment for covariates. Conclusions: This study provides population-based estimates of IPV prevalence and factors associated with IPV using surveillance data. By pooling BRFSS data from individual states, the resulting large sample has adequate power to detect significant associations and has increased precision in the estimates of IPV risk. In addition, this study identifies high-risk populations to target for education and intervention programs and demonstrates the need for improved IPV surveillance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036008876&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036008876&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0749-3797(01)00431-7

DO - 10.1016/S0749-3797(01)00431-7

M3 - Article

C2 - 11897459

AN - SCOPUS:0036008876

VL - 22

SP - 156

EP - 164

JO - American Journal of Preventive Medicine

JF - American Journal of Preventive Medicine

SN - 0749-3797

IS - 3

ER -