Muscle-bone interactions during fracture healing

K. M. Davis, K. S. Griffin, T.M. Gabriel Chu, J. C. Wenke, B. T. Corona, T. O. McKinley, Melissa Kacena

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although it is generally accepted that the rate and strength of fracture healing is intimately linked to the integrity of surrounding soft tissues, the contribution of muscle has largely been viewed as a vascular supply for oxygen and nutrient exchange. However, more is becoming known about the cellular and paracrine contributions of muscle to the fracture healing process. Research has shown that muscle is capable of supplying osteoprogenitor cells in cases where the periosteum is insufficient, and the muscular osteoprogenitors possess similar osteogenic potential to those derived from the periosteum. Muscle’s secrotome includes proteins capable of inhibiting or enhancing osteogenesis and myogenesis following musculoskeletal injury and can be garnered for therapeutic use in patients with traumatic musculoskeletal injuries. In this review, we will highlight the current knowledge on muscle- bone interaction in the context of fracture healing as well as concisely present the current models to study such interactions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-9
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions
Volume15
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Fracture Healing
Bone and Bones
Muscles
Periosteum
Muscle Development
Wounds and Injuries
Therapeutic Uses
Osteogenesis
Blood Vessels
Oxygen
Food
Research
Proteins

Keywords

  • Bone
  • Fracture
  • Mesenchymal stem cells
  • Muscle
  • Paracrine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physiology

Cite this

Davis, K. M., Griffin, K. S., Chu, T. M. G., Wenke, J. C., Corona, B. T., McKinley, T. O., & Kacena, M. (2015). Muscle-bone interactions during fracture healing. Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions, 15(1), 1-9.

Muscle-bone interactions during fracture healing. / Davis, K. M.; Griffin, K. S.; Chu, T.M. Gabriel; Wenke, J. C.; Corona, B. T.; McKinley, T. O.; Kacena, Melissa.

In: Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2015, p. 1-9.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Davis, KM, Griffin, KS, Chu, TMG, Wenke, JC, Corona, BT, McKinley, TO & Kacena, M 2015, 'Muscle-bone interactions during fracture healing', Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1-9.
Davis KM, Griffin KS, Chu TMG, Wenke JC, Corona BT, McKinley TO et al. Muscle-bone interactions during fracture healing. Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions. 2015;15(1):1-9.
Davis, K. M. ; Griffin, K. S. ; Chu, T.M. Gabriel ; Wenke, J. C. ; Corona, B. T. ; McKinley, T. O. ; Kacena, Melissa. / Muscle-bone interactions during fracture healing. In: Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions. 2015 ; Vol. 15, No. 1. pp. 1-9.
@article{66b07e6cc6be44d8b8044a3976ca91e7,
title = "Muscle-bone interactions during fracture healing",
abstract = "Although it is generally accepted that the rate and strength of fracture healing is intimately linked to the integrity of surrounding soft tissues, the contribution of muscle has largely been viewed as a vascular supply for oxygen and nutrient exchange. However, more is becoming known about the cellular and paracrine contributions of muscle to the fracture healing process. Research has shown that muscle is capable of supplying osteoprogenitor cells in cases where the periosteum is insufficient, and the muscular osteoprogenitors possess similar osteogenic potential to those derived from the periosteum. Muscle’s secrotome includes proteins capable of inhibiting or enhancing osteogenesis and myogenesis following musculoskeletal injury and can be garnered for therapeutic use in patients with traumatic musculoskeletal injuries. In this review, we will highlight the current knowledge on muscle- bone interaction in the context of fracture healing as well as concisely present the current models to study such interactions.",
keywords = "Bone, Fracture, Mesenchymal stem cells, Muscle, Paracrine",
author = "Davis, {K. M.} and Griffin, {K. S.} and Chu, {T.M. Gabriel} and Wenke, {J. C.} and Corona, {B. T.} and McKinley, {T. O.} and Melissa Kacena",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "1--9",
journal = "Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions",
issn = "1108-7161",
publisher = "International Society of Musculoskeletal and Neuronal Interactions",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Muscle-bone interactions during fracture healing

AU - Davis, K. M.

AU - Griffin, K. S.

AU - Chu, T.M. Gabriel

AU - Wenke, J. C.

AU - Corona, B. T.

AU - McKinley, T. O.

AU - Kacena, Melissa

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Although it is generally accepted that the rate and strength of fracture healing is intimately linked to the integrity of surrounding soft tissues, the contribution of muscle has largely been viewed as a vascular supply for oxygen and nutrient exchange. However, more is becoming known about the cellular and paracrine contributions of muscle to the fracture healing process. Research has shown that muscle is capable of supplying osteoprogenitor cells in cases where the periosteum is insufficient, and the muscular osteoprogenitors possess similar osteogenic potential to those derived from the periosteum. Muscle’s secrotome includes proteins capable of inhibiting or enhancing osteogenesis and myogenesis following musculoskeletal injury and can be garnered for therapeutic use in patients with traumatic musculoskeletal injuries. In this review, we will highlight the current knowledge on muscle- bone interaction in the context of fracture healing as well as concisely present the current models to study such interactions.

AB - Although it is generally accepted that the rate and strength of fracture healing is intimately linked to the integrity of surrounding soft tissues, the contribution of muscle has largely been viewed as a vascular supply for oxygen and nutrient exchange. However, more is becoming known about the cellular and paracrine contributions of muscle to the fracture healing process. Research has shown that muscle is capable of supplying osteoprogenitor cells in cases where the periosteum is insufficient, and the muscular osteoprogenitors possess similar osteogenic potential to those derived from the periosteum. Muscle’s secrotome includes proteins capable of inhibiting or enhancing osteogenesis and myogenesis following musculoskeletal injury and can be garnered for therapeutic use in patients with traumatic musculoskeletal injuries. In this review, we will highlight the current knowledge on muscle- bone interaction in the context of fracture healing as well as concisely present the current models to study such interactions.

KW - Bone

KW - Fracture

KW - Mesenchymal stem cells

KW - Muscle

KW - Paracrine

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923854936&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923854936&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 25730647

AN - SCOPUS:84923854936

VL - 15

SP - 1

EP - 9

JO - Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions

JF - Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interactions

SN - 1108-7161

IS - 1

ER -