National Cancer Institute Centers and Society of Surgical Oncology Cancer Research Synergy

Bradford J. Kim, Subhasis Misra, Herbert Chen, Teresa M. Bell, Leonidas Koniaris, Nakul P. Valsangkar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to examine the influence of Surgical Society Oncology (SSO) membership and National Cancer Institute (NCI) status on the academic output of surgical faculty. Methods: NCI cancer program status for each department of surgery was identified with publically available data, whereas SSO membership was determined for every faculty member. Academic output measures such as NIH funding, publications, and citations were analyzed in subsets by the type of cancer center (NCI comprehensive cancer center [CCC]; NCI cancer center [NCICC]; and non-NCI center) and SSO membership status. Results: Of the surgical faculty, 2537 surgeons (61.9%) were from CCC, whereas 854 (20.8%) were from NCICC. At the CCC, 22.7% of surgeons had a history of or current NIH funding, compared with 15.8% at the NCICC and 11.8% at the non-NCI centers. The academic output of SSO members was higher at NCICC (52 ± 113 publications/1266 ± 3830 citations) and CCC (53 ± 92/1295 ± 4001) compared with nonmembers (NCICC: 26 ± 78/437 ± 2109; CCC: 37 ± 91/670 ± 3260), respectively, P < 0.05. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that SSO membership imparts an additional 22 publications and 270 citations, whereas NCI-designated CCC added 10 additional publications, but not citations. Conclusions: CCCs have significantly higher academic output and NIH funding. Recruitment of SSO members, a focus on higher performing divisions, and NIH funding are factors that non-NCI cancer centers may be able to focus on to improve academic productivity to aid in obtaining NCI designation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)92-100
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Surgical Research
Volume236
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2019

Fingerprint

National Cancer Institute (U.S.)
Research
Neoplasms
Publications

Keywords

  • Academic
  • Career
  • Surgeon
  • Surgical education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

National Cancer Institute Centers and Society of Surgical Oncology Cancer Research Synergy. / Kim, Bradford J.; Misra, Subhasis; Chen, Herbert; Bell, Teresa M.; Koniaris, Leonidas; Valsangkar, Nakul P.

In: Journal of Surgical Research, Vol. 236, 01.04.2019, p. 92-100.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kim, Bradford J. ; Misra, Subhasis ; Chen, Herbert ; Bell, Teresa M. ; Koniaris, Leonidas ; Valsangkar, Nakul P. / National Cancer Institute Centers and Society of Surgical Oncology Cancer Research Synergy. In: Journal of Surgical Research. 2019 ; Vol. 236. pp. 92-100.
@article{b77cfeb4d9f041049f41b490cc838469,
title = "National Cancer Institute Centers and Society of Surgical Oncology Cancer Research Synergy",
abstract = "Background: The objective of this study was to examine the influence of Surgical Society Oncology (SSO) membership and National Cancer Institute (NCI) status on the academic output of surgical faculty. Methods: NCI cancer program status for each department of surgery was identified with publically available data, whereas SSO membership was determined for every faculty member. Academic output measures such as NIH funding, publications, and citations were analyzed in subsets by the type of cancer center (NCI comprehensive cancer center [CCC]; NCI cancer center [NCICC]; and non-NCI center) and SSO membership status. Results: Of the surgical faculty, 2537 surgeons (61.9{\%}) were from CCC, whereas 854 (20.8{\%}) were from NCICC. At the CCC, 22.7{\%} of surgeons had a history of or current NIH funding, compared with 15.8{\%} at the NCICC and 11.8{\%} at the non-NCI centers. The academic output of SSO members was higher at NCICC (52 ± 113 publications/1266 ± 3830 citations) and CCC (53 ± 92/1295 ± 4001) compared with nonmembers (NCICC: 26 ± 78/437 ± 2109; CCC: 37 ± 91/670 ± 3260), respectively, P < 0.05. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that SSO membership imparts an additional 22 publications and 270 citations, whereas NCI-designated CCC added 10 additional publications, but not citations. Conclusions: CCCs have significantly higher academic output and NIH funding. Recruitment of SSO members, a focus on higher performing divisions, and NIH funding are factors that non-NCI cancer centers may be able to focus on to improve academic productivity to aid in obtaining NCI designation.",
keywords = "Academic, Career, Surgeon, Surgical education",
author = "Kim, {Bradford J.} and Subhasis Misra and Herbert Chen and Bell, {Teresa M.} and Leonidas Koniaris and Valsangkar, {Nakul P.}",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jss.2018.11.009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "236",
pages = "92--100",
journal = "Journal of Surgical Research",
issn = "0022-4804",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - National Cancer Institute Centers and Society of Surgical Oncology Cancer Research Synergy

AU - Kim, Bradford J.

AU - Misra, Subhasis

AU - Chen, Herbert

AU - Bell, Teresa M.

AU - Koniaris, Leonidas

AU - Valsangkar, Nakul P.

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - Background: The objective of this study was to examine the influence of Surgical Society Oncology (SSO) membership and National Cancer Institute (NCI) status on the academic output of surgical faculty. Methods: NCI cancer program status for each department of surgery was identified with publically available data, whereas SSO membership was determined for every faculty member. Academic output measures such as NIH funding, publications, and citations were analyzed in subsets by the type of cancer center (NCI comprehensive cancer center [CCC]; NCI cancer center [NCICC]; and non-NCI center) and SSO membership status. Results: Of the surgical faculty, 2537 surgeons (61.9%) were from CCC, whereas 854 (20.8%) were from NCICC. At the CCC, 22.7% of surgeons had a history of or current NIH funding, compared with 15.8% at the NCICC and 11.8% at the non-NCI centers. The academic output of SSO members was higher at NCICC (52 ± 113 publications/1266 ± 3830 citations) and CCC (53 ± 92/1295 ± 4001) compared with nonmembers (NCICC: 26 ± 78/437 ± 2109; CCC: 37 ± 91/670 ± 3260), respectively, P < 0.05. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that SSO membership imparts an additional 22 publications and 270 citations, whereas NCI-designated CCC added 10 additional publications, but not citations. Conclusions: CCCs have significantly higher academic output and NIH funding. Recruitment of SSO members, a focus on higher performing divisions, and NIH funding are factors that non-NCI cancer centers may be able to focus on to improve academic productivity to aid in obtaining NCI designation.

AB - Background: The objective of this study was to examine the influence of Surgical Society Oncology (SSO) membership and National Cancer Institute (NCI) status on the academic output of surgical faculty. Methods: NCI cancer program status for each department of surgery was identified with publically available data, whereas SSO membership was determined for every faculty member. Academic output measures such as NIH funding, publications, and citations were analyzed in subsets by the type of cancer center (NCI comprehensive cancer center [CCC]; NCI cancer center [NCICC]; and non-NCI center) and SSO membership status. Results: Of the surgical faculty, 2537 surgeons (61.9%) were from CCC, whereas 854 (20.8%) were from NCICC. At the CCC, 22.7% of surgeons had a history of or current NIH funding, compared with 15.8% at the NCICC and 11.8% at the non-NCI centers. The academic output of SSO members was higher at NCICC (52 ± 113 publications/1266 ± 3830 citations) and CCC (53 ± 92/1295 ± 4001) compared with nonmembers (NCICC: 26 ± 78/437 ± 2109; CCC: 37 ± 91/670 ± 3260), respectively, P < 0.05. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that SSO membership imparts an additional 22 publications and 270 citations, whereas NCI-designated CCC added 10 additional publications, but not citations. Conclusions: CCCs have significantly higher academic output and NIH funding. Recruitment of SSO members, a focus on higher performing divisions, and NIH funding are factors that non-NCI cancer centers may be able to focus on to improve academic productivity to aid in obtaining NCI designation.

KW - Academic

KW - Career

KW - Surgeon

KW - Surgical education

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057587188&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85057587188&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jss.2018.11.009

DO - 10.1016/j.jss.2018.11.009

M3 - Article

C2 - 30694784

AN - SCOPUS:85057587188

VL - 236

SP - 92

EP - 100

JO - Journal of Surgical Research

JF - Journal of Surgical Research

SN - 0022-4804

ER -