National survey of physicians' perception of the cause, complications, and management of gastroparesis

Lauren Carney Briley, Steven P. Harrell, Allison Woosley, Jennifer Eversmann, John Wo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Manifestations of gastroparesis are heterogeneous and clinical complications are poorly defined. Misconceptions of gastroparesis may be common. The objective was to determine physicians' perception of gastroparesis and identify areas that need further research and education. METHODS: A physician survey was prospectively developed and tested. The survey included questions on the etiology, symptoms, management and perceived complications of gastroparesis. Physicians' feedback included rated responses by Likert scale and ranked responses by priority. A total of 3658 surveys were mailed to gastroenterologists and general practitioners using an online physician directory and a local medical society directory. Analysis of variance and t test were utilized. RESULTS: A total of 397 surveys were returned. 85.9% of responses were from the national survey and 14.1% were local. Physicians ranked diabetes (70%) as the most common cause of gastroparesis, followed by idiopathic (21%) and postsurgical (9%). Postprandial epigastric pain (61%) was ranked as the most frequent symptom of gastroparesis, followed by retching/vomiting (20%) and heartburn/regurgitation (19%). 60% believed scintigraphy t1/2 is an accurate measurement of gastric emptying. Only one-third believed gastric electrical stimulation was effective as treatment of gastroparesis. Physicians rated abdominal pain as the most clinically significant complication of gastroparesis surpassing weight loss, hospitalization for dehydration, and malnutrition (P <0.01). There were small but statistically significant differences between gastroenterologists versus general practitioners and private versus academic physicians. CONCLUSION: More physician awareness and education is needed on gastroparesis and the standardized four-hour gastric scintigraphy method, as well to clarify the management strategy for this condition.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)412-417
Number of pages6
JournalSouthern Medical Journal
Volume104
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Gastroparesis
Physicians
Directories
Radionuclide Imaging
General Practitioners
Stomach
Education
Surveys and Questionnaires
Heartburn
Medical Societies
Gastric Emptying
Dehydration
Malnutrition
Abdominal Pain
Electric Stimulation
Vomiting
Weight Loss
Analysis of Variance
Hospitalization
Pain

Keywords

  • abdominal pain
  • gastric scintigraphy
  • gastroparesis
  • national survey

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

National survey of physicians' perception of the cause, complications, and management of gastroparesis. / Briley, Lauren Carney; Harrell, Steven P.; Woosley, Allison; Eversmann, Jennifer; Wo, John.

In: Southern Medical Journal, Vol. 104, No. 6, 06.2011, p. 412-417.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Briley, Lauren Carney ; Harrell, Steven P. ; Woosley, Allison ; Eversmann, Jennifer ; Wo, John. / National survey of physicians' perception of the cause, complications, and management of gastroparesis. In: Southern Medical Journal. 2011 ; Vol. 104, No. 6. pp. 412-417.
@article{5920cd5307f542cf87daf71c7578bd74,
title = "National survey of physicians' perception of the cause, complications, and management of gastroparesis",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: Manifestations of gastroparesis are heterogeneous and clinical complications are poorly defined. Misconceptions of gastroparesis may be common. The objective was to determine physicians' perception of gastroparesis and identify areas that need further research and education. METHODS: A physician survey was prospectively developed and tested. The survey included questions on the etiology, symptoms, management and perceived complications of gastroparesis. Physicians' feedback included rated responses by Likert scale and ranked responses by priority. A total of 3658 surveys were mailed to gastroenterologists and general practitioners using an online physician directory and a local medical society directory. Analysis of variance and t test were utilized. RESULTS: A total of 397 surveys were returned. 85.9{\%} of responses were from the national survey and 14.1{\%} were local. Physicians ranked diabetes (70{\%}) as the most common cause of gastroparesis, followed by idiopathic (21{\%}) and postsurgical (9{\%}). Postprandial epigastric pain (61{\%}) was ranked as the most frequent symptom of gastroparesis, followed by retching/vomiting (20{\%}) and heartburn/regurgitation (19{\%}). 60{\%} believed scintigraphy t1/2 is an accurate measurement of gastric emptying. Only one-third believed gastric electrical stimulation was effective as treatment of gastroparesis. Physicians rated abdominal pain as the most clinically significant complication of gastroparesis surpassing weight loss, hospitalization for dehydration, and malnutrition (P <0.01). There were small but statistically significant differences between gastroenterologists versus general practitioners and private versus academic physicians. CONCLUSION: More physician awareness and education is needed on gastroparesis and the standardized four-hour gastric scintigraphy method, as well to clarify the management strategy for this condition.",
keywords = "abdominal pain, gastric scintigraphy, gastroparesis, national survey",
author = "Briley, {Lauren Carney} and Harrell, {Steven P.} and Allison Woosley and Jennifer Eversmann and John Wo",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1097/SMJ.0b013e318215fa5a",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "104",
pages = "412--417",
journal = "Southern Medical Journal",
issn = "0038-4348",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - National survey of physicians' perception of the cause, complications, and management of gastroparesis

AU - Briley, Lauren Carney

AU - Harrell, Steven P.

AU - Woosley, Allison

AU - Eversmann, Jennifer

AU - Wo, John

PY - 2011/6

Y1 - 2011/6

N2 - OBJECTIVES: Manifestations of gastroparesis are heterogeneous and clinical complications are poorly defined. Misconceptions of gastroparesis may be common. The objective was to determine physicians' perception of gastroparesis and identify areas that need further research and education. METHODS: A physician survey was prospectively developed and tested. The survey included questions on the etiology, symptoms, management and perceived complications of gastroparesis. Physicians' feedback included rated responses by Likert scale and ranked responses by priority. A total of 3658 surveys were mailed to gastroenterologists and general practitioners using an online physician directory and a local medical society directory. Analysis of variance and t test were utilized. RESULTS: A total of 397 surveys were returned. 85.9% of responses were from the national survey and 14.1% were local. Physicians ranked diabetes (70%) as the most common cause of gastroparesis, followed by idiopathic (21%) and postsurgical (9%). Postprandial epigastric pain (61%) was ranked as the most frequent symptom of gastroparesis, followed by retching/vomiting (20%) and heartburn/regurgitation (19%). 60% believed scintigraphy t1/2 is an accurate measurement of gastric emptying. Only one-third believed gastric electrical stimulation was effective as treatment of gastroparesis. Physicians rated abdominal pain as the most clinically significant complication of gastroparesis surpassing weight loss, hospitalization for dehydration, and malnutrition (P <0.01). There were small but statistically significant differences between gastroenterologists versus general practitioners and private versus academic physicians. CONCLUSION: More physician awareness and education is needed on gastroparesis and the standardized four-hour gastric scintigraphy method, as well to clarify the management strategy for this condition.

AB - OBJECTIVES: Manifestations of gastroparesis are heterogeneous and clinical complications are poorly defined. Misconceptions of gastroparesis may be common. The objective was to determine physicians' perception of gastroparesis and identify areas that need further research and education. METHODS: A physician survey was prospectively developed and tested. The survey included questions on the etiology, symptoms, management and perceived complications of gastroparesis. Physicians' feedback included rated responses by Likert scale and ranked responses by priority. A total of 3658 surveys were mailed to gastroenterologists and general practitioners using an online physician directory and a local medical society directory. Analysis of variance and t test were utilized. RESULTS: A total of 397 surveys were returned. 85.9% of responses were from the national survey and 14.1% were local. Physicians ranked diabetes (70%) as the most common cause of gastroparesis, followed by idiopathic (21%) and postsurgical (9%). Postprandial epigastric pain (61%) was ranked as the most frequent symptom of gastroparesis, followed by retching/vomiting (20%) and heartburn/regurgitation (19%). 60% believed scintigraphy t1/2 is an accurate measurement of gastric emptying. Only one-third believed gastric electrical stimulation was effective as treatment of gastroparesis. Physicians rated abdominal pain as the most clinically significant complication of gastroparesis surpassing weight loss, hospitalization for dehydration, and malnutrition (P <0.01). There were small but statistically significant differences between gastroenterologists versus general practitioners and private versus academic physicians. CONCLUSION: More physician awareness and education is needed on gastroparesis and the standardized four-hour gastric scintigraphy method, as well to clarify the management strategy for this condition.

KW - abdominal pain

KW - gastric scintigraphy

KW - gastroparesis

KW - national survey

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79957449993&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79957449993&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e318215fa5a

DO - 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e318215fa5a

M3 - Article

VL - 104

SP - 412

EP - 417

JO - Southern Medical Journal

JF - Southern Medical Journal

SN - 0038-4348

IS - 6

ER -