Near-continuous, noninvasive blood pressure monitoring in the out-of-hospital setting

Stephen H. Thomas, Greg Winsor, Peter Pang, Suzanne K. Wedel, Blair Parry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives. This study was conducted to test out-of-hospital performance of a noninvasive radial artery tonometry device to assess blood pressure (BP), providing readings every 10-12 seconds. The primary objective was to determine the correlation between noninvasive BPs calculated with radial artery tonometry and standard oscillometric cuff methods. The secondary objective was to determine whether the difference observed between the two techniques was consistent over the range of BPs measured. Methods. This prospective trial enrolled adults transported by helicopter (n = 9 patients), fixed-wing airplane (n = 1), or ground vehicle (n = 10) of a single transport service. Patients had BP assessed simultaneously, by both standard automatic cuff and radial artery tonometry device, every 5 minutes. Data were assessed with correlation coefficients, and Bland-Altman techniques were utilized to assess for bias over the range of mean arterial pressures (MAPs) encountered. For all tests, p was set at 0.05. Results. No major problem with radial artery tonometry device field performance was noted. There were 139 pairs of MAP assessments in 20 patients. The correlation coefficient for the two assessment modalities was 0.96. Bland-Altman bias plot and Pitman's test (p = 0.11) revealed good correlation between the two assessment mechanisms over the entire range of MAPs (42 to 163 mm Hg) encountered in the study. Conclusion. The radial artery tonometry device provided MAP assessments that were highly correlated with readings from a standard oscillometric device. The radial artery tonometry device performed well in a variety of patient types and in multiple transport vehicles, and there was no sign that its performance was adversely affected by the out-of-hospital setting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)68-72
Number of pages5
JournalPrehospital Emergency Care
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Radial Artery
Manometry
Blood Pressure
Equipment and Supplies
Arterial Pressure
Aircraft
Reading

Keywords

  • Air transport
  • Blood pressure
  • EMS
  • Monitoring
  • Prehospital

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Near-continuous, noninvasive blood pressure monitoring in the out-of-hospital setting. / Thomas, Stephen H.; Winsor, Greg; Pang, Peter; Wedel, Suzanne K.; Parry, Blair.

In: Prehospital Emergency Care, Vol. 9, No. 1, 01.2005, p. 68-72.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Thomas, Stephen H. ; Winsor, Greg ; Pang, Peter ; Wedel, Suzanne K. ; Parry, Blair. / Near-continuous, noninvasive blood pressure monitoring in the out-of-hospital setting. In: Prehospital Emergency Care. 2005 ; Vol. 9, No. 1. pp. 68-72.
@article{7d54830518cd4ff4b248a8500226ca89,
title = "Near-continuous, noninvasive blood pressure monitoring in the out-of-hospital setting",
abstract = "Objectives. This study was conducted to test out-of-hospital performance of a noninvasive radial artery tonometry device to assess blood pressure (BP), providing readings every 10-12 seconds. The primary objective was to determine the correlation between noninvasive BPs calculated with radial artery tonometry and standard oscillometric cuff methods. The secondary objective was to determine whether the difference observed between the two techniques was consistent over the range of BPs measured. Methods. This prospective trial enrolled adults transported by helicopter (n = 9 patients), fixed-wing airplane (n = 1), or ground vehicle (n = 10) of a single transport service. Patients had BP assessed simultaneously, by both standard automatic cuff and radial artery tonometry device, every 5 minutes. Data were assessed with correlation coefficients, and Bland-Altman techniques were utilized to assess for bias over the range of mean arterial pressures (MAPs) encountered. For all tests, p was set at 0.05. Results. No major problem with radial artery tonometry device field performance was noted. There were 139 pairs of MAP assessments in 20 patients. The correlation coefficient for the two assessment modalities was 0.96. Bland-Altman bias plot and Pitman's test (p = 0.11) revealed good correlation between the two assessment mechanisms over the entire range of MAPs (42 to 163 mm Hg) encountered in the study. Conclusion. The radial artery tonometry device provided MAP assessments that were highly correlated with readings from a standard oscillometric device. The radial artery tonometry device performed well in a variety of patient types and in multiple transport vehicles, and there was no sign that its performance was adversely affected by the out-of-hospital setting.",
keywords = "Air transport, Blood pressure, EMS, Monitoring, Prehospital",
author = "Thomas, {Stephen H.} and Greg Winsor and Peter Pang and Wedel, {Suzanne K.} and Blair Parry",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10903120590891958",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "68--72",
journal = "Prehospital Emergency Care",
issn = "1090-3127",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Near-continuous, noninvasive blood pressure monitoring in the out-of-hospital setting

AU - Thomas, Stephen H.

AU - Winsor, Greg

AU - Pang, Peter

AU - Wedel, Suzanne K.

AU - Parry, Blair

PY - 2005/1

Y1 - 2005/1

N2 - Objectives. This study was conducted to test out-of-hospital performance of a noninvasive radial artery tonometry device to assess blood pressure (BP), providing readings every 10-12 seconds. The primary objective was to determine the correlation between noninvasive BPs calculated with radial artery tonometry and standard oscillometric cuff methods. The secondary objective was to determine whether the difference observed between the two techniques was consistent over the range of BPs measured. Methods. This prospective trial enrolled adults transported by helicopter (n = 9 patients), fixed-wing airplane (n = 1), or ground vehicle (n = 10) of a single transport service. Patients had BP assessed simultaneously, by both standard automatic cuff and radial artery tonometry device, every 5 minutes. Data were assessed with correlation coefficients, and Bland-Altman techniques were utilized to assess for bias over the range of mean arterial pressures (MAPs) encountered. For all tests, p was set at 0.05. Results. No major problem with radial artery tonometry device field performance was noted. There were 139 pairs of MAP assessments in 20 patients. The correlation coefficient for the two assessment modalities was 0.96. Bland-Altman bias plot and Pitman's test (p = 0.11) revealed good correlation between the two assessment mechanisms over the entire range of MAPs (42 to 163 mm Hg) encountered in the study. Conclusion. The radial artery tonometry device provided MAP assessments that were highly correlated with readings from a standard oscillometric device. The radial artery tonometry device performed well in a variety of patient types and in multiple transport vehicles, and there was no sign that its performance was adversely affected by the out-of-hospital setting.

AB - Objectives. This study was conducted to test out-of-hospital performance of a noninvasive radial artery tonometry device to assess blood pressure (BP), providing readings every 10-12 seconds. The primary objective was to determine the correlation between noninvasive BPs calculated with radial artery tonometry and standard oscillometric cuff methods. The secondary objective was to determine whether the difference observed between the two techniques was consistent over the range of BPs measured. Methods. This prospective trial enrolled adults transported by helicopter (n = 9 patients), fixed-wing airplane (n = 1), or ground vehicle (n = 10) of a single transport service. Patients had BP assessed simultaneously, by both standard automatic cuff and radial artery tonometry device, every 5 minutes. Data were assessed with correlation coefficients, and Bland-Altman techniques were utilized to assess for bias over the range of mean arterial pressures (MAPs) encountered. For all tests, p was set at 0.05. Results. No major problem with radial artery tonometry device field performance was noted. There were 139 pairs of MAP assessments in 20 patients. The correlation coefficient for the two assessment modalities was 0.96. Bland-Altman bias plot and Pitman's test (p = 0.11) revealed good correlation between the two assessment mechanisms over the entire range of MAPs (42 to 163 mm Hg) encountered in the study. Conclusion. The radial artery tonometry device provided MAP assessments that were highly correlated with readings from a standard oscillometric device. The radial artery tonometry device performed well in a variety of patient types and in multiple transport vehicles, and there was no sign that its performance was adversely affected by the out-of-hospital setting.

KW - Air transport

KW - Blood pressure

KW - EMS

KW - Monitoring

KW - Prehospital

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=23244438772&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=23244438772&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10903120590891958

DO - 10.1080/10903120590891958

M3 - Article

C2 - 16036831

AN - SCOPUS:23244438772

VL - 9

SP - 68

EP - 72

JO - Prehospital Emergency Care

JF - Prehospital Emergency Care

SN - 1090-3127

IS - 1

ER -