Neonatal circumcision: A dispassionate analysis

Lee A. Learman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This review provides a dispassionate analysis of the evidence on the benefits and risks of neonatal circumcision. The evidence is considered within a clinically relevant framework in which decision-making relies on three interrelated factors: 1) clinical experience, 2) scientific evidence, and 3) patient preference. The roles of patient preference and clinical experience are outlined; then health benefits, risks, and economic costs of circumcision are explored. The most commonly proposed benefits of circumcision are prevention of penile inflammatory disorders, urinary tract infections, penile cancer, and sexually transmitted diseases. Meanwhile, the short-term risks of circumcision include surgical complications and the infliction of pain and distress on the neonate. A potential long-term consequence of the procedure is sexual dysfunction. In considering the cost-effectiveness of circumcision, the following areas are taken into account: 1) economic data on the direct and indirect cost of the procedure and subsequent care, 2) valid estimates of the probability of events prevented and events cause by the intervention, and 3) an accurate estimate of the circumcision's impact on health status. Evidence of the technical aspects of circumcision, namely, the surgical and anesthetic techniques, are also reviewed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)849-859
Number of pages11
JournalClinical Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume42
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Patient Preference
Economics
Penile Neoplasms
Costs and Cost Analysis
Insurance Benefits
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Urinary Tract Infections
Health Status
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Anesthetics
Decision Making
Pain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Neonatal circumcision : A dispassionate analysis. / Learman, Lee A.

In: Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 42, No. 4, 12.1999, p. 849-859.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Learman, Lee A. / Neonatal circumcision : A dispassionate analysis. In: Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1999 ; Vol. 42, No. 4. pp. 849-859.
@article{b51758b2cb9d49a89dbbccafeb091144,
title = "Neonatal circumcision: A dispassionate analysis",
abstract = "This review provides a dispassionate analysis of the evidence on the benefits and risks of neonatal circumcision. The evidence is considered within a clinically relevant framework in which decision-making relies on three interrelated factors: 1) clinical experience, 2) scientific evidence, and 3) patient preference. The roles of patient preference and clinical experience are outlined; then health benefits, risks, and economic costs of circumcision are explored. The most commonly proposed benefits of circumcision are prevention of penile inflammatory disorders, urinary tract infections, penile cancer, and sexually transmitted diseases. Meanwhile, the short-term risks of circumcision include surgical complications and the infliction of pain and distress on the neonate. A potential long-term consequence of the procedure is sexual dysfunction. In considering the cost-effectiveness of circumcision, the following areas are taken into account: 1) economic data on the direct and indirect cost of the procedure and subsequent care, 2) valid estimates of the probability of events prevented and events cause by the intervention, and 3) an accurate estimate of the circumcision's impact on health status. Evidence of the technical aspects of circumcision, namely, the surgical and anesthetic techniques, are also reviewed.",
author = "Learman, {Lee A.}",
year = "1999",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1097/00003081-199912000-00011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "849--859",
journal = "Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0009-9201",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neonatal circumcision

T2 - A dispassionate analysis

AU - Learman, Lee A.

PY - 1999/12

Y1 - 1999/12

N2 - This review provides a dispassionate analysis of the evidence on the benefits and risks of neonatal circumcision. The evidence is considered within a clinically relevant framework in which decision-making relies on three interrelated factors: 1) clinical experience, 2) scientific evidence, and 3) patient preference. The roles of patient preference and clinical experience are outlined; then health benefits, risks, and economic costs of circumcision are explored. The most commonly proposed benefits of circumcision are prevention of penile inflammatory disorders, urinary tract infections, penile cancer, and sexually transmitted diseases. Meanwhile, the short-term risks of circumcision include surgical complications and the infliction of pain and distress on the neonate. A potential long-term consequence of the procedure is sexual dysfunction. In considering the cost-effectiveness of circumcision, the following areas are taken into account: 1) economic data on the direct and indirect cost of the procedure and subsequent care, 2) valid estimates of the probability of events prevented and events cause by the intervention, and 3) an accurate estimate of the circumcision's impact on health status. Evidence of the technical aspects of circumcision, namely, the surgical and anesthetic techniques, are also reviewed.

AB - This review provides a dispassionate analysis of the evidence on the benefits and risks of neonatal circumcision. The evidence is considered within a clinically relevant framework in which decision-making relies on three interrelated factors: 1) clinical experience, 2) scientific evidence, and 3) patient preference. The roles of patient preference and clinical experience are outlined; then health benefits, risks, and economic costs of circumcision are explored. The most commonly proposed benefits of circumcision are prevention of penile inflammatory disorders, urinary tract infections, penile cancer, and sexually transmitted diseases. Meanwhile, the short-term risks of circumcision include surgical complications and the infliction of pain and distress on the neonate. A potential long-term consequence of the procedure is sexual dysfunction. In considering the cost-effectiveness of circumcision, the following areas are taken into account: 1) economic data on the direct and indirect cost of the procedure and subsequent care, 2) valid estimates of the probability of events prevented and events cause by the intervention, and 3) an accurate estimate of the circumcision's impact on health status. Evidence of the technical aspects of circumcision, namely, the surgical and anesthetic techniques, are also reviewed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033397361&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033397361&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00003081-199912000-00011

DO - 10.1097/00003081-199912000-00011

M3 - Article

C2 - 10572698

AN - SCOPUS:0033397361

VL - 42

SP - 849

EP - 859

JO - Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0009-9201

IS - 4

ER -