Nephrology research - The past, present and future

Jürgen Floege, Robert H. Mak, Bruce Molitoris, Giuseppe Remuzzi, Pierre Ronco

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Important advances have been made in basic and clinical nephrology research over the past decade, with improved pathological insights into various disease processes and the introduction of new treatments for diseases such as atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome. However, many challenges remain. In this Viewpoint, we asked five Nature Reviews Nephrology Advisory Board members, who have been associated with the journal since its launch in November 2005, to reflect on the progress and roadblocks of the past 10 years. They also comment on areas where effort and money should be invested and how they expect the field to progress in the next 10 years.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)677-687
Number of pages11
JournalNature Reviews Nephrology
Volume11
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2015

Fingerprint

Nephrology
Research
Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nephrology

Cite this

Nephrology research - The past, present and future. / Floege, Jürgen; Mak, Robert H.; Molitoris, Bruce; Remuzzi, Giuseppe; Ronco, Pierre.

In: Nature Reviews Nephrology, Vol. 11, No. 11, 01.11.2015, p. 677-687.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Floege, Jürgen ; Mak, Robert H. ; Molitoris, Bruce ; Remuzzi, Giuseppe ; Ronco, Pierre. / Nephrology research - The past, present and future. In: Nature Reviews Nephrology. 2015 ; Vol. 11, No. 11. pp. 677-687.
@article{9a2169242267469f854ec9d9cd79df7e,
title = "Nephrology research - The past, present and future",
abstract = "Important advances have been made in basic and clinical nephrology research over the past decade, with improved pathological insights into various disease processes and the introduction of new treatments for diseases such as atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome. However, many challenges remain. In this Viewpoint, we asked five Nature Reviews Nephrology Advisory Board members, who have been associated with the journal since its launch in November 2005, to reflect on the progress and roadblocks of the past 10 years. They also comment on areas where effort and money should be invested and how they expect the field to progress in the next 10 years.",
author = "J{\"u}rgen Floege and Mak, {Robert H.} and Bruce Molitoris and Giuseppe Remuzzi and Pierre Ronco",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1038/nrneph.2015.152",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "677--687",
journal = "Nature Reviews Nephrology",
issn = "1759-507X",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nephrology research - The past, present and future

AU - Floege, Jürgen

AU - Mak, Robert H.

AU - Molitoris, Bruce

AU - Remuzzi, Giuseppe

AU - Ronco, Pierre

PY - 2015/11/1

Y1 - 2015/11/1

N2 - Important advances have been made in basic and clinical nephrology research over the past decade, with improved pathological insights into various disease processes and the introduction of new treatments for diseases such as atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome. However, many challenges remain. In this Viewpoint, we asked five Nature Reviews Nephrology Advisory Board members, who have been associated with the journal since its launch in November 2005, to reflect on the progress and roadblocks of the past 10 years. They also comment on areas where effort and money should be invested and how they expect the field to progress in the next 10 years.

AB - Important advances have been made in basic and clinical nephrology research over the past decade, with improved pathological insights into various disease processes and the introduction of new treatments for diseases such as atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome. However, many challenges remain. In this Viewpoint, we asked five Nature Reviews Nephrology Advisory Board members, who have been associated with the journal since its launch in November 2005, to reflect on the progress and roadblocks of the past 10 years. They also comment on areas where effort and money should be invested and how they expect the field to progress in the next 10 years.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945479338&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84945479338&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/nrneph.2015.152

DO - 10.1038/nrneph.2015.152

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 677

EP - 687

JO - Nature Reviews Nephrology

JF - Nature Reviews Nephrology

SN - 1759-507X

IS - 11

ER -