Nerve-sparing Prostatectomy and Urinary Function

A Prospective Analysis Using Validated Quality-of-life Measures

E. Jason Abel, Timothy Masterson, Jonathan N. Warner, Karen Valentine, Christopher Dechet

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To prospectively study whether urinary function and bother are directly related to neurovascular bundle preservation at radical prostatectomy using validated quality-of-life questionnaires. Methods: A total of 91 consecutive patients undergoing radical prostatectomy were prospectively studied using the University of California, Los Angeles, Prostate Cancer Index and the International Prostate Symptom Score. The patients were divided into 2 groups (>50% nerve sparing vs ≤50% nerve sparing). To control for differences in the 2 groups, linear mixed models were performed to adjust for the time after surgery, preoperative sexual ability, and urinary function. Results: Of the 91 patients, 62 (68%) had >50% nerve-sparing during prostatectomy. Their mean age at surgery was 59 ± 6 years, and the mean follow-up was 16 ± 9 months. Of the 91 patients, 29 (32%) had ≤50% nerve sparing during prostatectomy. Their mean age at surgery was 64 ± 8 years, and the mean follow-up was 13 ± 7 months. Increased nerve sparing was associated with better urinary function (P = .014) and less urinary bother (P = .043). After adjusting for preoperative variables, the increased nerve-sparing group scored 8.4 points (95% confidence interval 1.3-15.4) higher for urinary function and 8.5 points (95% confidence interval 0.3-16.8) higher for urinary bother compared with the group. The International Prostate Symptom Score improved in both groups of patients, and no significant differences were found between the 2 groups. Conclusions: The results of our study have shown that nerve-sparing prostatectomy is associated with improvement in urinary function and bother. This improvement was modest and is of unknown clinical significance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1336-1340
Number of pages5
JournalUrology
Volume73
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Prostatectomy
Quality of Life
Prostate
Confidence Intervals
Los Angeles
Linear Models
Prostatic Neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Nerve-sparing Prostatectomy and Urinary Function : A Prospective Analysis Using Validated Quality-of-life Measures. / Abel, E. Jason; Masterson, Timothy; Warner, Jonathan N.; Valentine, Karen; Dechet, Christopher.

In: Urology, Vol. 73, No. 6, 06.2009, p. 1336-1340.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abel, E. Jason ; Masterson, Timothy ; Warner, Jonathan N. ; Valentine, Karen ; Dechet, Christopher. / Nerve-sparing Prostatectomy and Urinary Function : A Prospective Analysis Using Validated Quality-of-life Measures. In: Urology. 2009 ; Vol. 73, No. 6. pp. 1336-1340.
@article{3d544ff93c884ddc855a2f9b771bb575,
title = "Nerve-sparing Prostatectomy and Urinary Function: A Prospective Analysis Using Validated Quality-of-life Measures",
abstract = "Objectives: To prospectively study whether urinary function and bother are directly related to neurovascular bundle preservation at radical prostatectomy using validated quality-of-life questionnaires. Methods: A total of 91 consecutive patients undergoing radical prostatectomy were prospectively studied using the University of California, Los Angeles, Prostate Cancer Index and the International Prostate Symptom Score. The patients were divided into 2 groups (>50{\%} nerve sparing vs ≤50{\%} nerve sparing). To control for differences in the 2 groups, linear mixed models were performed to adjust for the time after surgery, preoperative sexual ability, and urinary function. Results: Of the 91 patients, 62 (68{\%}) had >50{\%} nerve-sparing during prostatectomy. Their mean age at surgery was 59 ± 6 years, and the mean follow-up was 16 ± 9 months. Of the 91 patients, 29 (32{\%}) had ≤50{\%} nerve sparing during prostatectomy. Their mean age at surgery was 64 ± 8 years, and the mean follow-up was 13 ± 7 months. Increased nerve sparing was associated with better urinary function (P = .014) and less urinary bother (P = .043). After adjusting for preoperative variables, the increased nerve-sparing group scored 8.4 points (95{\%} confidence interval 1.3-15.4) higher for urinary function and 8.5 points (95{\%} confidence interval 0.3-16.8) higher for urinary bother compared with the group. The International Prostate Symptom Score improved in both groups of patients, and no significant differences were found between the 2 groups. Conclusions: The results of our study have shown that nerve-sparing prostatectomy is associated with improvement in urinary function and bother. This improvement was modest and is of unknown clinical significance.",
author = "Abel, {E. Jason} and Timothy Masterson and Warner, {Jonathan N.} and Karen Valentine and Christopher Dechet",
year = "2009",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.urology.2008.10.077",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "73",
pages = "1336--1340",
journal = "Urology",
issn = "0090-4295",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nerve-sparing Prostatectomy and Urinary Function

T2 - A Prospective Analysis Using Validated Quality-of-life Measures

AU - Abel, E. Jason

AU - Masterson, Timothy

AU - Warner, Jonathan N.

AU - Valentine, Karen

AU - Dechet, Christopher

PY - 2009/6

Y1 - 2009/6

N2 - Objectives: To prospectively study whether urinary function and bother are directly related to neurovascular bundle preservation at radical prostatectomy using validated quality-of-life questionnaires. Methods: A total of 91 consecutive patients undergoing radical prostatectomy were prospectively studied using the University of California, Los Angeles, Prostate Cancer Index and the International Prostate Symptom Score. The patients were divided into 2 groups (>50% nerve sparing vs ≤50% nerve sparing). To control for differences in the 2 groups, linear mixed models were performed to adjust for the time after surgery, preoperative sexual ability, and urinary function. Results: Of the 91 patients, 62 (68%) had >50% nerve-sparing during prostatectomy. Their mean age at surgery was 59 ± 6 years, and the mean follow-up was 16 ± 9 months. Of the 91 patients, 29 (32%) had ≤50% nerve sparing during prostatectomy. Their mean age at surgery was 64 ± 8 years, and the mean follow-up was 13 ± 7 months. Increased nerve sparing was associated with better urinary function (P = .014) and less urinary bother (P = .043). After adjusting for preoperative variables, the increased nerve-sparing group scored 8.4 points (95% confidence interval 1.3-15.4) higher for urinary function and 8.5 points (95% confidence interval 0.3-16.8) higher for urinary bother compared with the group. The International Prostate Symptom Score improved in both groups of patients, and no significant differences were found between the 2 groups. Conclusions: The results of our study have shown that nerve-sparing prostatectomy is associated with improvement in urinary function and bother. This improvement was modest and is of unknown clinical significance.

AB - Objectives: To prospectively study whether urinary function and bother are directly related to neurovascular bundle preservation at radical prostatectomy using validated quality-of-life questionnaires. Methods: A total of 91 consecutive patients undergoing radical prostatectomy were prospectively studied using the University of California, Los Angeles, Prostate Cancer Index and the International Prostate Symptom Score. The patients were divided into 2 groups (>50% nerve sparing vs ≤50% nerve sparing). To control for differences in the 2 groups, linear mixed models were performed to adjust for the time after surgery, preoperative sexual ability, and urinary function. Results: Of the 91 patients, 62 (68%) had >50% nerve-sparing during prostatectomy. Their mean age at surgery was 59 ± 6 years, and the mean follow-up was 16 ± 9 months. Of the 91 patients, 29 (32%) had ≤50% nerve sparing during prostatectomy. Their mean age at surgery was 64 ± 8 years, and the mean follow-up was 13 ± 7 months. Increased nerve sparing was associated with better urinary function (P = .014) and less urinary bother (P = .043). After adjusting for preoperative variables, the increased nerve-sparing group scored 8.4 points (95% confidence interval 1.3-15.4) higher for urinary function and 8.5 points (95% confidence interval 0.3-16.8) higher for urinary bother compared with the group. The International Prostate Symptom Score improved in both groups of patients, and no significant differences were found between the 2 groups. Conclusions: The results of our study have shown that nerve-sparing prostatectomy is associated with improvement in urinary function and bother. This improvement was modest and is of unknown clinical significance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67349202187&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67349202187&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.urology.2008.10.077

DO - 10.1016/j.urology.2008.10.077

M3 - Article

VL - 73

SP - 1336

EP - 1340

JO - Urology

JF - Urology

SN - 0090-4295

IS - 6

ER -