Neuropsychological Assessment of Schizophrenia versus Brain Damage

A Review

James Malec

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The previous 10 years of research comparing neuropsychological test performances of adults diagnosed as schizophrenic with adults diagnosed as brain damaged is reviewed. Current concepts and criteria for classifying and sub-classifying patients in terms of brain damage and schizophrenia are presented. Right hemisphere, left hemisphere, and diffusely brain-damaged patients and paranoid, reactive, and process schizophrenics may differ in neuropsychological test performances. However, not all differences among these groups are well substantiated or well understood. Few studies were found that reported consistently using the most valid criteria in forming schizophrenic and brain damaged samples. Furthermore, only a small proportion of studies included appropriate controls for age, IQ or education, length of hospitalizaton, and drug effects. Canter’s Background Interference Procedure and DeWolfe’s Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale sign approach have been found to discriminate well between schizophrenic and brain-damaged groups after replicated investigation of these procedures. The Halstead-Reitan Battery provided discriminatory power equivalent to, but not superior to, many single measures. However, the use of inadequate criteria appears to have resulted in an imposed ceiling (70 to 75 percent accuracy) on the discriminatory power of psychological tests. Recommendations for future research include: A) the use of more valid criteria for brain damage (i.e., computerized tomographic scan) and more valid and standardized assessment of schizophrenia (i.e., Inpatient Multidimensional Psychiatric Rating Scale) in classifying subjects; b) evaluating all subjects using both neurological and psychopathological criteria; c) reporting percentages of hits, false negatives, and false positives; and d) increased comparisons among schizophrenic and brain-damaged subclassifications.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)507-516
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Nervous and Mental Disease
Volume166
Issue number7
StatePublished - 1978
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Schizophrenia
Brain
Neuropsychological Tests
Psychological Tests
Intelligence
Psychiatry
Inpatients
Education
Research
Pharmaceutical Preparations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Neuropsychological Assessment of Schizophrenia versus Brain Damage : A Review. / Malec, James.

In: Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, Vol. 166, No. 7, 1978, p. 507-516.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{104f74cae9ff438aae90704b85dc337b,
title = "Neuropsychological Assessment of Schizophrenia versus Brain Damage: A Review",
abstract = "The previous 10 years of research comparing neuropsychological test performances of adults diagnosed as schizophrenic with adults diagnosed as brain damaged is reviewed. Current concepts and criteria for classifying and sub-classifying patients in terms of brain damage and schizophrenia are presented. Right hemisphere, left hemisphere, and diffusely brain-damaged patients and paranoid, reactive, and process schizophrenics may differ in neuropsychological test performances. However, not all differences among these groups are well substantiated or well understood. Few studies were found that reported consistently using the most valid criteria in forming schizophrenic and brain damaged samples. Furthermore, only a small proportion of studies included appropriate controls for age, IQ or education, length of hospitalizaton, and drug effects. Canter’s Background Interference Procedure and DeWolfe’s Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale sign approach have been found to discriminate well between schizophrenic and brain-damaged groups after replicated investigation of these procedures. The Halstead-Reitan Battery provided discriminatory power equivalent to, but not superior to, many single measures. However, the use of inadequate criteria appears to have resulted in an imposed ceiling (70 to 75 percent accuracy) on the discriminatory power of psychological tests. Recommendations for future research include: A) the use of more valid criteria for brain damage (i.e., computerized tomographic scan) and more valid and standardized assessment of schizophrenia (i.e., Inpatient Multidimensional Psychiatric Rating Scale) in classifying subjects; b) evaluating all subjects using both neurological and psychopathological criteria; c) reporting percentages of hits, false negatives, and false positives; and d) increased comparisons among schizophrenic and brain-damaged subclassifications.",
author = "James Malec",
year = "1978",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "166",
pages = "507--516",
journal = "Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease",
issn = "0022-3018",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neuropsychological Assessment of Schizophrenia versus Brain Damage

T2 - A Review

AU - Malec, James

PY - 1978

Y1 - 1978

N2 - The previous 10 years of research comparing neuropsychological test performances of adults diagnosed as schizophrenic with adults diagnosed as brain damaged is reviewed. Current concepts and criteria for classifying and sub-classifying patients in terms of brain damage and schizophrenia are presented. Right hemisphere, left hemisphere, and diffusely brain-damaged patients and paranoid, reactive, and process schizophrenics may differ in neuropsychological test performances. However, not all differences among these groups are well substantiated or well understood. Few studies were found that reported consistently using the most valid criteria in forming schizophrenic and brain damaged samples. Furthermore, only a small proportion of studies included appropriate controls for age, IQ or education, length of hospitalizaton, and drug effects. Canter’s Background Interference Procedure and DeWolfe’s Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale sign approach have been found to discriminate well between schizophrenic and brain-damaged groups after replicated investigation of these procedures. The Halstead-Reitan Battery provided discriminatory power equivalent to, but not superior to, many single measures. However, the use of inadequate criteria appears to have resulted in an imposed ceiling (70 to 75 percent accuracy) on the discriminatory power of psychological tests. Recommendations for future research include: A) the use of more valid criteria for brain damage (i.e., computerized tomographic scan) and more valid and standardized assessment of schizophrenia (i.e., Inpatient Multidimensional Psychiatric Rating Scale) in classifying subjects; b) evaluating all subjects using both neurological and psychopathological criteria; c) reporting percentages of hits, false negatives, and false positives; and d) increased comparisons among schizophrenic and brain-damaged subclassifications.

AB - The previous 10 years of research comparing neuropsychological test performances of adults diagnosed as schizophrenic with adults diagnosed as brain damaged is reviewed. Current concepts and criteria for classifying and sub-classifying patients in terms of brain damage and schizophrenia are presented. Right hemisphere, left hemisphere, and diffusely brain-damaged patients and paranoid, reactive, and process schizophrenics may differ in neuropsychological test performances. However, not all differences among these groups are well substantiated or well understood. Few studies were found that reported consistently using the most valid criteria in forming schizophrenic and brain damaged samples. Furthermore, only a small proportion of studies included appropriate controls for age, IQ or education, length of hospitalizaton, and drug effects. Canter’s Background Interference Procedure and DeWolfe’s Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale sign approach have been found to discriminate well between schizophrenic and brain-damaged groups after replicated investigation of these procedures. The Halstead-Reitan Battery provided discriminatory power equivalent to, but not superior to, many single measures. However, the use of inadequate criteria appears to have resulted in an imposed ceiling (70 to 75 percent accuracy) on the discriminatory power of psychological tests. Recommendations for future research include: A) the use of more valid criteria for brain damage (i.e., computerized tomographic scan) and more valid and standardized assessment of schizophrenia (i.e., Inpatient Multidimensional Psychiatric Rating Scale) in classifying subjects; b) evaluating all subjects using both neurological and psychopathological criteria; c) reporting percentages of hits, false negatives, and false positives; and d) increased comparisons among schizophrenic and brain-damaged subclassifications.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0017850251&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0017850251&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 166

SP - 507

EP - 516

JO - Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease

JF - Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease

SN - 0022-3018

IS - 7

ER -