New diagnostic tests for pulmonary embolism

Jeffrey Kline, Kathryn L. Johns, Stephen A. Colucciello, Elizabeth G. Israel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

79 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In 1990, the multicenter Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (P OPED), sponsored by the National Institutes of Health, compared the diagnostic value of the radioisotopic ventilation-perfusion lung scan (V/Q scan) with that of pulmonary angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE). Despite the endurance of the radioisotopic V/Q scan as the most wide y used test for evaluation of pulmonary embolism (PE), a better screening tool is clearly needed for use in the emergency department. During the past decade, several new modalities have emerged for evaluation of patients with suspected PE. We evaluate the diagnostic utility of the D-dimer test and the alveolar dead space determination as potential screening tests and of spiral computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, transthoracic echocardiography, and transesophageal echoeardiography as potential confirmatory tests for PE. For comparison, recent data on the diagnostic utility of the alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient and the V/Q scan are included. The potential application of these new tests to a hypothetical ED population is described.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)168-180
Number of pages13
JournalAnnals of Emergency Medicine
Volume35
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Pulmonary Embolism
Routine Diagnostic Tests
Lung
Spiral Computed Tomography
National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Ventilation
Echocardiography
Hospital Emergency Service
Angiography
Perfusion
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Oxygen
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Kline, J., Johns, K. L., Colucciello, S. A., & Israel, E. G. (2000). New diagnostic tests for pulmonary embolism. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 35(2), 168-180.

New diagnostic tests for pulmonary embolism. / Kline, Jeffrey; Johns, Kathryn L.; Colucciello, Stephen A.; Israel, Elizabeth G.

In: Annals of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 35, No. 2, 2000, p. 168-180.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kline, J, Johns, KL, Colucciello, SA & Israel, EG 2000, 'New diagnostic tests for pulmonary embolism', Annals of Emergency Medicine, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 168-180.
Kline J, Johns KL, Colucciello SA, Israel EG. New diagnostic tests for pulmonary embolism. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2000;35(2):168-180.
Kline, Jeffrey ; Johns, Kathryn L. ; Colucciello, Stephen A. ; Israel, Elizabeth G. / New diagnostic tests for pulmonary embolism. In: Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2000 ; Vol. 35, No. 2. pp. 168-180.
@article{a0f751587b124864b529b5f120b6ac79,
title = "New diagnostic tests for pulmonary embolism",
abstract = "In 1990, the multicenter Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (P OPED), sponsored by the National Institutes of Health, compared the diagnostic value of the radioisotopic ventilation-perfusion lung scan (V/Q scan) with that of pulmonary angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE). Despite the endurance of the radioisotopic V/Q scan as the most wide y used test for evaluation of pulmonary embolism (PE), a better screening tool is clearly needed for use in the emergency department. During the past decade, several new modalities have emerged for evaluation of patients with suspected PE. We evaluate the diagnostic utility of the D-dimer test and the alveolar dead space determination as potential screening tests and of spiral computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, transthoracic echocardiography, and transesophageal echoeardiography as potential confirmatory tests for PE. For comparison, recent data on the diagnostic utility of the alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient and the V/Q scan are included. The potential application of these new tests to a hypothetical ED population is described.",
author = "Jeffrey Kline and Johns, {Kathryn L.} and Colucciello, {Stephen A.} and Israel, {Elizabeth G.}",
year = "2000",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "168--180",
journal = "Annals of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0196-0644",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - New diagnostic tests for pulmonary embolism

AU - Kline, Jeffrey

AU - Johns, Kathryn L.

AU - Colucciello, Stephen A.

AU - Israel, Elizabeth G.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - In 1990, the multicenter Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (P OPED), sponsored by the National Institutes of Health, compared the diagnostic value of the radioisotopic ventilation-perfusion lung scan (V/Q scan) with that of pulmonary angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE). Despite the endurance of the radioisotopic V/Q scan as the most wide y used test for evaluation of pulmonary embolism (PE), a better screening tool is clearly needed for use in the emergency department. During the past decade, several new modalities have emerged for evaluation of patients with suspected PE. We evaluate the diagnostic utility of the D-dimer test and the alveolar dead space determination as potential screening tests and of spiral computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, transthoracic echocardiography, and transesophageal echoeardiography as potential confirmatory tests for PE. For comparison, recent data on the diagnostic utility of the alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient and the V/Q scan are included. The potential application of these new tests to a hypothetical ED population is described.

AB - In 1990, the multicenter Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (P OPED), sponsored by the National Institutes of Health, compared the diagnostic value of the radioisotopic ventilation-perfusion lung scan (V/Q scan) with that of pulmonary angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE). Despite the endurance of the radioisotopic V/Q scan as the most wide y used test for evaluation of pulmonary embolism (PE), a better screening tool is clearly needed for use in the emergency department. During the past decade, several new modalities have emerged for evaluation of patients with suspected PE. We evaluate the diagnostic utility of the D-dimer test and the alveolar dead space determination as potential screening tests and of spiral computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, transthoracic echocardiography, and transesophageal echoeardiography as potential confirmatory tests for PE. For comparison, recent data on the diagnostic utility of the alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient and the V/Q scan are included. The potential application of these new tests to a hypothetical ED population is described.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033881036&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033881036&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10650235

AN - SCOPUS:0033881036

VL - 35

SP - 168

EP - 180

JO - Annals of Emergency Medicine

JF - Annals of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0196-0644

IS - 2

ER -