New directions for assessing speech perception in persons with sensory aids

K. I. Kirk, David Pisoni, M. S. Sommers, M. Young, C. Evanson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examined the influence of stimulus variability and lexical difficulty on the speech perception performance of adults who used either multichannel cochlear implants or conventional heating aids. The effects of stimulus variability were examined by comparing word identification in single-talker versus multiple-talker conditions. Lexical effects were assessed by comparing recognition of 'easy' words (ie, words that occur frequently and have few phonemically similar words, or neighbors) with 'hard' words (ie, words with the opposite lexical characteristics). Word recognition performance was assessed in either closed- or open-set response formats. The results demonstrated that both stimulus variability and lexical difficulty influenced word recognition performance. Identification scores were poorer in the multiple-talker than in the single-talker conditions. Also, scores for lexically 'easy' items were better than those for 'hard' items. The effects of stimulus variability were not evident when a closed-set response format was employed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)300-303
Number of pages4
JournalAnnals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology
Volume104
Issue number9 II SUPPL.
StatePublished - 1995

Fingerprint

Sensory Aids
Speech Perception
Cochlear Implants
Heating
Recognition (Psychology)
Direction compound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Kirk, K. I., Pisoni, D., Sommers, M. S., Young, M., & Evanson, C. (1995). New directions for assessing speech perception in persons with sensory aids. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 104(9 II SUPPL.), 300-303.

New directions for assessing speech perception in persons with sensory aids. / Kirk, K. I.; Pisoni, David; Sommers, M. S.; Young, M.; Evanson, C.

In: Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, Vol. 104, No. 9 II SUPPL., 1995, p. 300-303.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kirk, KI, Pisoni, D, Sommers, MS, Young, M & Evanson, C 1995, 'New directions for assessing speech perception in persons with sensory aids', Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, vol. 104, no. 9 II SUPPL., pp. 300-303.
Kirk, K. I. ; Pisoni, David ; Sommers, M. S. ; Young, M. ; Evanson, C. / New directions for assessing speech perception in persons with sensory aids. In: Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology. 1995 ; Vol. 104, No. 9 II SUPPL. pp. 300-303.
@article{efbcc2829a6c456cadd4410a1a7ec4de,
title = "New directions for assessing speech perception in persons with sensory aids",
abstract = "This study examined the influence of stimulus variability and lexical difficulty on the speech perception performance of adults who used either multichannel cochlear implants or conventional heating aids. The effects of stimulus variability were examined by comparing word identification in single-talker versus multiple-talker conditions. Lexical effects were assessed by comparing recognition of 'easy' words (ie, words that occur frequently and have few phonemically similar words, or neighbors) with 'hard' words (ie, words with the opposite lexical characteristics). Word recognition performance was assessed in either closed- or open-set response formats. The results demonstrated that both stimulus variability and lexical difficulty influenced word recognition performance. Identification scores were poorer in the multiple-talker than in the single-talker conditions. Also, scores for lexically 'easy' items were better than those for 'hard' items. The effects of stimulus variability were not evident when a closed-set response format was employed.",
author = "Kirk, {K. I.} and David Pisoni and Sommers, {M. S.} and M. Young and C. Evanson",
year = "1995",
language = "English",
volume = "104",
pages = "300--303",
journal = "Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology",
issn = "0003-4894",
publisher = "Annals Publishing Company",
number = "9 II SUPPL.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - New directions for assessing speech perception in persons with sensory aids

AU - Kirk, K. I.

AU - Pisoni, David

AU - Sommers, M. S.

AU - Young, M.

AU - Evanson, C.

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - This study examined the influence of stimulus variability and lexical difficulty on the speech perception performance of adults who used either multichannel cochlear implants or conventional heating aids. The effects of stimulus variability were examined by comparing word identification in single-talker versus multiple-talker conditions. Lexical effects were assessed by comparing recognition of 'easy' words (ie, words that occur frequently and have few phonemically similar words, or neighbors) with 'hard' words (ie, words with the opposite lexical characteristics). Word recognition performance was assessed in either closed- or open-set response formats. The results demonstrated that both stimulus variability and lexical difficulty influenced word recognition performance. Identification scores were poorer in the multiple-talker than in the single-talker conditions. Also, scores for lexically 'easy' items were better than those for 'hard' items. The effects of stimulus variability were not evident when a closed-set response format was employed.

AB - This study examined the influence of stimulus variability and lexical difficulty on the speech perception performance of adults who used either multichannel cochlear implants or conventional heating aids. The effects of stimulus variability were examined by comparing word identification in single-talker versus multiple-talker conditions. Lexical effects were assessed by comparing recognition of 'easy' words (ie, words that occur frequently and have few phonemically similar words, or neighbors) with 'hard' words (ie, words with the opposite lexical characteristics). Word recognition performance was assessed in either closed- or open-set response formats. The results demonstrated that both stimulus variability and lexical difficulty influenced word recognition performance. Identification scores were poorer in the multiple-talker than in the single-talker conditions. Also, scores for lexically 'easy' items were better than those for 'hard' items. The effects of stimulus variability were not evident when a closed-set response format was employed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029092033&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029092033&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 104

SP - 300

EP - 303

JO - Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology

JF - Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology

SN - 0003-4894

IS - 9 II SUPPL.

ER -