New method to measure coronary velocity and coronary flow reserve

Z. D. Zhang, M. Svendsen, J. S. Choy, A. K. Sinha, Y. Huo, K. Yoshida, S. Molloi, G. S. Kassab

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Coronary flow reserve (CFR) is an important index of coronary microcirculatory function. The objective of this study was to validate the reproducibility and accuracy of intravascular conductance catheter-based method for measurements of baseline and hyperemic coronary flow velocity (and hence CFR). The absolute coronary blood velocity was determined by measuring the time of transit of a saline injection between two pairs of electrodes (known distance) on a conductance catheter during a routine saline injection without the need for reference flow. In vitro validation was made in the velocity range of 5 to 70 cm/s in reference to the volume collection method. In 10 swine, velocity measurements were compared with those from a flow probe in coronary arteries at different CFR attained by micro sphere embolization. In vitro, the mean difference between the proposed method and volume collection was 0.7 ± 1.34 cm/s for steady flow and -0.77 ± 2.22 cm/s for pulsatile flow. The mean difference between duplicate measurements was 0 ± 1.4cm/s. In in vivo experiments, the flow (product of velocity and lumen cross-sectional area that is also measured by the conductance catheter) was determined in both normal and stenotic vessels and the mean difference between the proposed method and flow probe was -1 ± 12ml/min (flow ranged from 10 to 130 ml/min). For CFR, the mean difference between the two methods was 0.06 ± 0.28 (range of 1 to3). Our results demonstrate the reproducibility and accuracy of velocity and CFR measurements with a conductance catheter by use of a standard saline injection. The ability of the combined measurement of coronary lumen area (as previously validated) and current velocity and CFR measurements provides an integrative diagnostic tool for interventional cardiology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)H21-H28
JournalAmerican Journal of Physiology - Heart and Circulatory Physiology
Volume301
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2011

Fingerprint

Catheters
Injections
Pulsatile Flow
Cardiology
Reproducibility of Results
Coronary Vessels
Electrodes
Swine
In Vitro Techniques

Keywords

  • Catheter
  • Conductance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Physiology (medical)
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

New method to measure coronary velocity and coronary flow reserve. / Zhang, Z. D.; Svendsen, M.; Choy, J. S.; Sinha, A. K.; Huo, Y.; Yoshida, K.; Molloi, S.; Kassab, G. S.

In: American Journal of Physiology - Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Vol. 301, No. 1, 01.07.2011, p. H21-H28.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zhang, Z. D. ; Svendsen, M. ; Choy, J. S. ; Sinha, A. K. ; Huo, Y. ; Yoshida, K. ; Molloi, S. ; Kassab, G. S. / New method to measure coronary velocity and coronary flow reserve. In: American Journal of Physiology - Heart and Circulatory Physiology. 2011 ; Vol. 301, No. 1. pp. H21-H28.
@article{484073aaf060499dbed58f960f24012a,
title = "New method to measure coronary velocity and coronary flow reserve",
abstract = "Coronary flow reserve (CFR) is an important index of coronary microcirculatory function. The objective of this study was to validate the reproducibility and accuracy of intravascular conductance catheter-based method for measurements of baseline and hyperemic coronary flow velocity (and hence CFR). The absolute coronary blood velocity was determined by measuring the time of transit of a saline injection between two pairs of electrodes (known distance) on a conductance catheter during a routine saline injection without the need for reference flow. In vitro validation was made in the velocity range of 5 to 70 cm/s in reference to the volume collection method. In 10 swine, velocity measurements were compared with those from a flow probe in coronary arteries at different CFR attained by micro sphere embolization. In vitro, the mean difference between the proposed method and volume collection was 0.7 ± 1.34 cm/s for steady flow and -0.77 ± 2.22 cm/s for pulsatile flow. The mean difference between duplicate measurements was 0 ± 1.4cm/s. In in vivo experiments, the flow (product of velocity and lumen cross-sectional area that is also measured by the conductance catheter) was determined in both normal and stenotic vessels and the mean difference between the proposed method and flow probe was -1 ± 12ml/min (flow ranged from 10 to 130 ml/min). For CFR, the mean difference between the two methods was 0.06 ± 0.28 (range of 1 to3). Our results demonstrate the reproducibility and accuracy of velocity and CFR measurements with a conductance catheter by use of a standard saline injection. The ability of the combined measurement of coronary lumen area (as previously validated) and current velocity and CFR measurements provides an integrative diagnostic tool for interventional cardiology.",
keywords = "Catheter, Conductance",
author = "Zhang, {Z. D.} and M. Svendsen and Choy, {J. S.} and Sinha, {A. K.} and Y. Huo and K. Yoshida and S. Molloi and Kassab, {G. S.}",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1152/ajpheart.00080.2011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "301",
pages = "H21--H28",
journal = "American Journal of Physiology",
issn = "0363-6135",
publisher = "American Physiological Society",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - New method to measure coronary velocity and coronary flow reserve

AU - Zhang, Z. D.

AU - Svendsen, M.

AU - Choy, J. S.

AU - Sinha, A. K.

AU - Huo, Y.

AU - Yoshida, K.

AU - Molloi, S.

AU - Kassab, G. S.

PY - 2011/7/1

Y1 - 2011/7/1

N2 - Coronary flow reserve (CFR) is an important index of coronary microcirculatory function. The objective of this study was to validate the reproducibility and accuracy of intravascular conductance catheter-based method for measurements of baseline and hyperemic coronary flow velocity (and hence CFR). The absolute coronary blood velocity was determined by measuring the time of transit of a saline injection between two pairs of electrodes (known distance) on a conductance catheter during a routine saline injection without the need for reference flow. In vitro validation was made in the velocity range of 5 to 70 cm/s in reference to the volume collection method. In 10 swine, velocity measurements were compared with those from a flow probe in coronary arteries at different CFR attained by micro sphere embolization. In vitro, the mean difference between the proposed method and volume collection was 0.7 ± 1.34 cm/s for steady flow and -0.77 ± 2.22 cm/s for pulsatile flow. The mean difference between duplicate measurements was 0 ± 1.4cm/s. In in vivo experiments, the flow (product of velocity and lumen cross-sectional area that is also measured by the conductance catheter) was determined in both normal and stenotic vessels and the mean difference between the proposed method and flow probe was -1 ± 12ml/min (flow ranged from 10 to 130 ml/min). For CFR, the mean difference between the two methods was 0.06 ± 0.28 (range of 1 to3). Our results demonstrate the reproducibility and accuracy of velocity and CFR measurements with a conductance catheter by use of a standard saline injection. The ability of the combined measurement of coronary lumen area (as previously validated) and current velocity and CFR measurements provides an integrative diagnostic tool for interventional cardiology.

AB - Coronary flow reserve (CFR) is an important index of coronary microcirculatory function. The objective of this study was to validate the reproducibility and accuracy of intravascular conductance catheter-based method for measurements of baseline and hyperemic coronary flow velocity (and hence CFR). The absolute coronary blood velocity was determined by measuring the time of transit of a saline injection between two pairs of electrodes (known distance) on a conductance catheter during a routine saline injection without the need for reference flow. In vitro validation was made in the velocity range of 5 to 70 cm/s in reference to the volume collection method. In 10 swine, velocity measurements were compared with those from a flow probe in coronary arteries at different CFR attained by micro sphere embolization. In vitro, the mean difference between the proposed method and volume collection was 0.7 ± 1.34 cm/s for steady flow and -0.77 ± 2.22 cm/s for pulsatile flow. The mean difference between duplicate measurements was 0 ± 1.4cm/s. In in vivo experiments, the flow (product of velocity and lumen cross-sectional area that is also measured by the conductance catheter) was determined in both normal and stenotic vessels and the mean difference between the proposed method and flow probe was -1 ± 12ml/min (flow ranged from 10 to 130 ml/min). For CFR, the mean difference between the two methods was 0.06 ± 0.28 (range of 1 to3). Our results demonstrate the reproducibility and accuracy of velocity and CFR measurements with a conductance catheter by use of a standard saline injection. The ability of the combined measurement of coronary lumen area (as previously validated) and current velocity and CFR measurements provides an integrative diagnostic tool for interventional cardiology.

KW - Catheter

KW - Conductance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79959915706&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79959915706&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1152/ajpheart.00080.2011

DO - 10.1152/ajpheart.00080.2011

M3 - Article

C2 - 21551277

AN - SCOPUS:79959915706

VL - 301

SP - H21-H28

JO - American Journal of Physiology

JF - American Journal of Physiology

SN - 0363-6135

IS - 1

ER -