No difference in transplant outcomes for local and import pancreas allografts

Jonathan A. Fridell, Richard Mangus, Edward F. Hollinger, Martin L. Milgrom, Tim Taber, Elaine Mohler, Jason Good, Michelle L. Goble, John A. Powelson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. In the United States, pancreas allograft allocation is strictly regulated. Local centers have the first option to accept an organ, followed by regional and national allocation for those not accepted locally. For a pancreas to be imported, many centers must have previously rejected the organ for transplantation. This study reviews the outcomes of all pancreas allografts transplanted at a single center between January 2003 and November 2007. Early graft function and graft survival were stratified by geographic source of the donor pancreas. Methods. The records of 247 pancreas recipients and the donors of 11 imported and discarded pancreas allografts were reviewed. Pancreas allograft survival is represented using a Kaplan-Meier survival curve comparing (1) locally procured and imported pancreas grafts and (2) grafts procured by a team from our own center with the grafts procured by another team. Results. Of the 247 grafts, 184 (74%) were local and 63 (26%) were imported. There were no differences between the two geographic groups in 1-year graft survival (local 91%, import 90%, P= 0.76). Similarly, graft survival was similar regardless of whether the organ was procured by our own team or by another center (local team 91%, another team 90%, P= 0.96). Conclusions. Pancreas allografts refused by a large number of centers may still be imported and successfully transplanted without affecting survival results.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)723-728
Number of pages6
JournalTransplantation
Volume88
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 15 2009

Fingerprint

Allografts
Pancreas
Transplants
Graft Survival
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Organ Transplantation
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

Keywords

  • Extended criteria donor
  • Pancreas allocation
  • Pancreas transplantation
  • Survival
  • Transplant outcomes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Transplantation

Cite this

Fridell, J. A., Mangus, R., Hollinger, E. F., Milgrom, M. L., Taber, T., Mohler, E., ... Powelson, J. A. (2009). No difference in transplant outcomes for local and import pancreas allografts. Transplantation, 88(5), 723-728. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0b013e3181b2a01b

No difference in transplant outcomes for local and import pancreas allografts. / Fridell, Jonathan A.; Mangus, Richard; Hollinger, Edward F.; Milgrom, Martin L.; Taber, Tim; Mohler, Elaine; Good, Jason; Goble, Michelle L.; Powelson, John A.

In: Transplantation, Vol. 88, No. 5, 15.09.2009, p. 723-728.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fridell, JA, Mangus, R, Hollinger, EF, Milgrom, ML, Taber, T, Mohler, E, Good, J, Goble, ML & Powelson, JA 2009, 'No difference in transplant outcomes for local and import pancreas allografts', Transplantation, vol. 88, no. 5, pp. 723-728. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0b013e3181b2a01b
Fridell, Jonathan A. ; Mangus, Richard ; Hollinger, Edward F. ; Milgrom, Martin L. ; Taber, Tim ; Mohler, Elaine ; Good, Jason ; Goble, Michelle L. ; Powelson, John A. / No difference in transplant outcomes for local and import pancreas allografts. In: Transplantation. 2009 ; Vol. 88, No. 5. pp. 723-728.
@article{432ccaa1130a4f56bd337825147d674f,
title = "No difference in transplant outcomes for local and import pancreas allografts",
abstract = "Background. In the United States, pancreas allograft allocation is strictly regulated. Local centers have the first option to accept an organ, followed by regional and national allocation for those not accepted locally. For a pancreas to be imported, many centers must have previously rejected the organ for transplantation. This study reviews the outcomes of all pancreas allografts transplanted at a single center between January 2003 and November 2007. Early graft function and graft survival were stratified by geographic source of the donor pancreas. Methods. The records of 247 pancreas recipients and the donors of 11 imported and discarded pancreas allografts were reviewed. Pancreas allograft survival is represented using a Kaplan-Meier survival curve comparing (1) locally procured and imported pancreas grafts and (2) grafts procured by a team from our own center with the grafts procured by another team. Results. Of the 247 grafts, 184 (74{\%}) were local and 63 (26{\%}) were imported. There were no differences between the two geographic groups in 1-year graft survival (local 91{\%}, import 90{\%}, P= 0.76). Similarly, graft survival was similar regardless of whether the organ was procured by our own team or by another center (local team 91{\%}, another team 90{\%}, P= 0.96). Conclusions. Pancreas allografts refused by a large number of centers may still be imported and successfully transplanted without affecting survival results.",
keywords = "Extended criteria donor, Pancreas allocation, Pancreas transplantation, Survival, Transplant outcomes",
author = "Fridell, {Jonathan A.} and Richard Mangus and Hollinger, {Edward F.} and Milgrom, {Martin L.} and Tim Taber and Elaine Mohler and Jason Good and Goble, {Michelle L.} and Powelson, {John A.}",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1097/TP.0b013e3181b2a01b",
language = "English",
volume = "88",
pages = "723--728",
journal = "Transplantation",
issn = "0041-1337",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - No difference in transplant outcomes for local and import pancreas allografts

AU - Fridell, Jonathan A.

AU - Mangus, Richard

AU - Hollinger, Edward F.

AU - Milgrom, Martin L.

AU - Taber, Tim

AU - Mohler, Elaine

AU - Good, Jason

AU - Goble, Michelle L.

AU - Powelson, John A.

PY - 2009/9/15

Y1 - 2009/9/15

N2 - Background. In the United States, pancreas allograft allocation is strictly regulated. Local centers have the first option to accept an organ, followed by regional and national allocation for those not accepted locally. For a pancreas to be imported, many centers must have previously rejected the organ for transplantation. This study reviews the outcomes of all pancreas allografts transplanted at a single center between January 2003 and November 2007. Early graft function and graft survival were stratified by geographic source of the donor pancreas. Methods. The records of 247 pancreas recipients and the donors of 11 imported and discarded pancreas allografts were reviewed. Pancreas allograft survival is represented using a Kaplan-Meier survival curve comparing (1) locally procured and imported pancreas grafts and (2) grafts procured by a team from our own center with the grafts procured by another team. Results. Of the 247 grafts, 184 (74%) were local and 63 (26%) were imported. There were no differences between the two geographic groups in 1-year graft survival (local 91%, import 90%, P= 0.76). Similarly, graft survival was similar regardless of whether the organ was procured by our own team or by another center (local team 91%, another team 90%, P= 0.96). Conclusions. Pancreas allografts refused by a large number of centers may still be imported and successfully transplanted without affecting survival results.

AB - Background. In the United States, pancreas allograft allocation is strictly regulated. Local centers have the first option to accept an organ, followed by regional and national allocation for those not accepted locally. For a pancreas to be imported, many centers must have previously rejected the organ for transplantation. This study reviews the outcomes of all pancreas allografts transplanted at a single center between January 2003 and November 2007. Early graft function and graft survival were stratified by geographic source of the donor pancreas. Methods. The records of 247 pancreas recipients and the donors of 11 imported and discarded pancreas allografts were reviewed. Pancreas allograft survival is represented using a Kaplan-Meier survival curve comparing (1) locally procured and imported pancreas grafts and (2) grafts procured by a team from our own center with the grafts procured by another team. Results. Of the 247 grafts, 184 (74%) were local and 63 (26%) were imported. There were no differences between the two geographic groups in 1-year graft survival (local 91%, import 90%, P= 0.76). Similarly, graft survival was similar regardless of whether the organ was procured by our own team or by another center (local team 91%, another team 90%, P= 0.96). Conclusions. Pancreas allografts refused by a large number of centers may still be imported and successfully transplanted without affecting survival results.

KW - Extended criteria donor

KW - Pancreas allocation

KW - Pancreas transplantation

KW - Survival

KW - Transplant outcomes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349577502&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70349577502&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181b2a01b

DO - 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181b2a01b

M3 - Article

C2 - 19741472

AN - SCOPUS:70349577502

VL - 88

SP - 723

EP - 728

JO - Transplantation

JF - Transplantation

SN - 0041-1337

IS - 5

ER -