Nonrestorative Treatments for Caries: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

O. Urquhart, M. P. Tampi, L. Pilcher, R. L. Slayton, M. W.B. Araujo, M. Fontana, S. Guzmán-Armstrong, M. M. Nascimento, B. B. Nový, N. Tinanoff, R. J. Weyant, M. S. Wolff, D. A. Young, D. T. Zero, R. Brignardello-Petersen, L. Banfield, A. Parikh, G. Joshi, A. Carrasco-Labra

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The goal of nonrestorative or non- and microinvasive caries treatment (fluoride- and nonfluoride-based interventions) is to manage the caries disease process at a lesion level and minimize the loss of sound tooth structure. The purpose of this systematic review and network meta-analysis was to summarize the available evidence on nonrestorative treatments for the outcomes of 1) arrest or reversal of noncavitated and cavitated carious lesions on primary and permanent teeth and 2) adverse events. We included parallel and split-mouth randomized controlled trials where patients were followed for any length of time. Studies were identified with MEDLINE and Embase via Ovid, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Pairs of reviewers independently conducted the selection of studies, data extraction, risk-of-bias assessments, and assessment of the certainty in the evidence with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Data were synthesized with a random effects model and a frequentist approach. Forty-four trials (48 reports) were eligible, which included 7,378 participants and assessed the effect of 22 interventions in arresting or reversing noncavitated or cavitated carious lesions. Four network meta-analyses suggested that sealants + 5% sodium fluoride (NaF) varnish, resin infiltration + 5% NaF varnish, and 5,000-ppm F (1.1% NaF) toothpaste or gel were the most effective for arresting or reversing noncavitated occlusal, approximal, and noncavitated and cavitated root carious lesions on primary and/or permanent teeth, respectively (low- to moderate-certainty evidence). Study-level data indicated that 5% NaF varnish was the most effective for arresting or reversing noncavitated facial/lingual carious lesions (low certainty) and that 38% silver diamine fluoride solution applied biannually was the most effective for arresting advanced cavitated carious lesions on any coronal surface (moderate to high certainty). Preventing the onset of caries is the ultimate goal of a caries management plan. However, if the disease is present, there is a variety of effective interventions to treat carious lesions nonrestoratively.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)14-26
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Dental Research
Volume98
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Paint
Topical Fluorides
Toothpastes
Tooth Loss
Sodium Fluoride
Deciduous Tooth
Fluorides
Tongue
MEDLINE
Mouth
Tooth
Randomized Controlled Trials
Gels
Databases
Therapeutics
Network Meta-Analysis
silver diamine fluoride

Keywords

  • caries
  • dental public health
  • evidence-based dentistry/health care
  • geriatric dentistry
  • pediatric dentistry
  • systematic reviews and evidence-based dentistry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Urquhart, O., Tampi, M. P., Pilcher, L., Slayton, R. L., Araujo, M. W. B., Fontana, M., ... Carrasco-Labra, A. (2019). Nonrestorative Treatments for Caries: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. Journal of Dental Research, 98(1), 14-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034518800014

Nonrestorative Treatments for Caries : Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. / Urquhart, O.; Tampi, M. P.; Pilcher, L.; Slayton, R. L.; Araujo, M. W.B.; Fontana, M.; Guzmán-Armstrong, S.; Nascimento, M. M.; Nový, B. B.; Tinanoff, N.; Weyant, R. J.; Wolff, M. S.; Young, D. A.; Zero, D. T.; Brignardello-Petersen, R.; Banfield, L.; Parikh, A.; Joshi, G.; Carrasco-Labra, A.

In: Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 98, No. 1, 01.01.2019, p. 14-26.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Urquhart, O, Tampi, MP, Pilcher, L, Slayton, RL, Araujo, MWB, Fontana, M, Guzmán-Armstrong, S, Nascimento, MM, Nový, BB, Tinanoff, N, Weyant, RJ, Wolff, MS, Young, DA, Zero, DT, Brignardello-Petersen, R, Banfield, L, Parikh, A, Joshi, G & Carrasco-Labra, A 2019, 'Nonrestorative Treatments for Caries: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis', Journal of Dental Research, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 14-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034518800014
Urquhart O, Tampi MP, Pilcher L, Slayton RL, Araujo MWB, Fontana M et al. Nonrestorative Treatments for Caries: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. Journal of Dental Research. 2019 Jan 1;98(1):14-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034518800014
Urquhart, O. ; Tampi, M. P. ; Pilcher, L. ; Slayton, R. L. ; Araujo, M. W.B. ; Fontana, M. ; Guzmán-Armstrong, S. ; Nascimento, M. M. ; Nový, B. B. ; Tinanoff, N. ; Weyant, R. J. ; Wolff, M. S. ; Young, D. A. ; Zero, D. T. ; Brignardello-Petersen, R. ; Banfield, L. ; Parikh, A. ; Joshi, G. ; Carrasco-Labra, A. / Nonrestorative Treatments for Caries : Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. In: Journal of Dental Research. 2019 ; Vol. 98, No. 1. pp. 14-26.
@article{9bc775d23b894018a1e6494e00725a3c,
title = "Nonrestorative Treatments for Caries: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis",
abstract = "The goal of nonrestorative or non- and microinvasive caries treatment (fluoride- and nonfluoride-based interventions) is to manage the caries disease process at a lesion level and minimize the loss of sound tooth structure. The purpose of this systematic review and network meta-analysis was to summarize the available evidence on nonrestorative treatments for the outcomes of 1) arrest or reversal of noncavitated and cavitated carious lesions on primary and permanent teeth and 2) adverse events. We included parallel and split-mouth randomized controlled trials where patients were followed for any length of time. Studies were identified with MEDLINE and Embase via Ovid, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Pairs of reviewers independently conducted the selection of studies, data extraction, risk-of-bias assessments, and assessment of the certainty in the evidence with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Data were synthesized with a random effects model and a frequentist approach. Forty-four trials (48 reports) were eligible, which included 7,378 participants and assessed the effect of 22 interventions in arresting or reversing noncavitated or cavitated carious lesions. Four network meta-analyses suggested that sealants + 5{\%} sodium fluoride (NaF) varnish, resin infiltration + 5{\%} NaF varnish, and 5,000-ppm F (1.1{\%} NaF) toothpaste or gel were the most effective for arresting or reversing noncavitated occlusal, approximal, and noncavitated and cavitated root carious lesions on primary and/or permanent teeth, respectively (low- to moderate-certainty evidence). Study-level data indicated that 5{\%} NaF varnish was the most effective for arresting or reversing noncavitated facial/lingual carious lesions (low certainty) and that 38{\%} silver diamine fluoride solution applied biannually was the most effective for arresting advanced cavitated carious lesions on any coronal surface (moderate to high certainty). Preventing the onset of caries is the ultimate goal of a caries management plan. However, if the disease is present, there is a variety of effective interventions to treat carious lesions nonrestoratively.",
keywords = "caries, dental public health, evidence-based dentistry/health care, geriatric dentistry, pediatric dentistry, systematic reviews and evidence-based dentistry",
author = "O. Urquhart and Tampi, {M. P.} and L. Pilcher and Slayton, {R. L.} and Araujo, {M. W.B.} and M. Fontana and S. Guzm{\'a}n-Armstrong and Nascimento, {M. M.} and Nov{\'y}, {B. B.} and N. Tinanoff and Weyant, {R. J.} and Wolff, {M. S.} and Young, {D. A.} and Zero, {D. T.} and R. Brignardello-Petersen and L. Banfield and A. Parikh and G. Joshi and A. Carrasco-Labra",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0022034518800014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "98",
pages = "14--26",
journal = "Journal of Dental Research",
issn = "0022-0345",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nonrestorative Treatments for Caries

T2 - Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

AU - Urquhart, O.

AU - Tampi, M. P.

AU - Pilcher, L.

AU - Slayton, R. L.

AU - Araujo, M. W.B.

AU - Fontana, M.

AU - Guzmán-Armstrong, S.

AU - Nascimento, M. M.

AU - Nový, B. B.

AU - Tinanoff, N.

AU - Weyant, R. J.

AU - Wolff, M. S.

AU - Young, D. A.

AU - Zero, D. T.

AU - Brignardello-Petersen, R.

AU - Banfield, L.

AU - Parikh, A.

AU - Joshi, G.

AU - Carrasco-Labra, A.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - The goal of nonrestorative or non- and microinvasive caries treatment (fluoride- and nonfluoride-based interventions) is to manage the caries disease process at a lesion level and minimize the loss of sound tooth structure. The purpose of this systematic review and network meta-analysis was to summarize the available evidence on nonrestorative treatments for the outcomes of 1) arrest or reversal of noncavitated and cavitated carious lesions on primary and permanent teeth and 2) adverse events. We included parallel and split-mouth randomized controlled trials where patients were followed for any length of time. Studies were identified with MEDLINE and Embase via Ovid, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Pairs of reviewers independently conducted the selection of studies, data extraction, risk-of-bias assessments, and assessment of the certainty in the evidence with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Data were synthesized with a random effects model and a frequentist approach. Forty-four trials (48 reports) were eligible, which included 7,378 participants and assessed the effect of 22 interventions in arresting or reversing noncavitated or cavitated carious lesions. Four network meta-analyses suggested that sealants + 5% sodium fluoride (NaF) varnish, resin infiltration + 5% NaF varnish, and 5,000-ppm F (1.1% NaF) toothpaste or gel were the most effective for arresting or reversing noncavitated occlusal, approximal, and noncavitated and cavitated root carious lesions on primary and/or permanent teeth, respectively (low- to moderate-certainty evidence). Study-level data indicated that 5% NaF varnish was the most effective for arresting or reversing noncavitated facial/lingual carious lesions (low certainty) and that 38% silver diamine fluoride solution applied biannually was the most effective for arresting advanced cavitated carious lesions on any coronal surface (moderate to high certainty). Preventing the onset of caries is the ultimate goal of a caries management plan. However, if the disease is present, there is a variety of effective interventions to treat carious lesions nonrestoratively.

AB - The goal of nonrestorative or non- and microinvasive caries treatment (fluoride- and nonfluoride-based interventions) is to manage the caries disease process at a lesion level and minimize the loss of sound tooth structure. The purpose of this systematic review and network meta-analysis was to summarize the available evidence on nonrestorative treatments for the outcomes of 1) arrest or reversal of noncavitated and cavitated carious lesions on primary and permanent teeth and 2) adverse events. We included parallel and split-mouth randomized controlled trials where patients were followed for any length of time. Studies were identified with MEDLINE and Embase via Ovid, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Pairs of reviewers independently conducted the selection of studies, data extraction, risk-of-bias assessments, and assessment of the certainty in the evidence with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Data were synthesized with a random effects model and a frequentist approach. Forty-four trials (48 reports) were eligible, which included 7,378 participants and assessed the effect of 22 interventions in arresting or reversing noncavitated or cavitated carious lesions. Four network meta-analyses suggested that sealants + 5% sodium fluoride (NaF) varnish, resin infiltration + 5% NaF varnish, and 5,000-ppm F (1.1% NaF) toothpaste or gel were the most effective for arresting or reversing noncavitated occlusal, approximal, and noncavitated and cavitated root carious lesions on primary and/or permanent teeth, respectively (low- to moderate-certainty evidence). Study-level data indicated that 5% NaF varnish was the most effective for arresting or reversing noncavitated facial/lingual carious lesions (low certainty) and that 38% silver diamine fluoride solution applied biannually was the most effective for arresting advanced cavitated carious lesions on any coronal surface (moderate to high certainty). Preventing the onset of caries is the ultimate goal of a caries management plan. However, if the disease is present, there is a variety of effective interventions to treat carious lesions nonrestoratively.

KW - caries

KW - dental public health

KW - evidence-based dentistry/health care

KW - geriatric dentistry

KW - pediatric dentistry

KW - systematic reviews and evidence-based dentistry

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054871248&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054871248&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0022034518800014

DO - 10.1177/0022034518800014

M3 - Review article

C2 - 30290130

AN - SCOPUS:85054871248

VL - 98

SP - 14

EP - 26

JO - Journal of Dental Research

JF - Journal of Dental Research

SN - 0022-0345

IS - 1

ER -