Nonword Imitation by Children with Cochlear Implants: Consonant Analyses

Caitlin Dillon, David Pisoni, Miranda Cleary, Allyson K. Carter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To complete detailed linguistic analyses of archived recordings of pediatric cochlear implant users' imitations of nonwords; to gain insight into the children's developing phonological systems and the wide range of variability in nonword responses. Design: Nonword repetition: repetition of 20 auditory-only English-sounding nonwords. Setting: Central Institute for the Deaf "Education of the Deaf Child" research program, St Louis, Mo. Participants: Eighty-eight 8- to 10-year-old experienced pediatric cochlear implant users. Main Outcome Measures: Several different consonant accuracy scores based on the linguistic structure (voicing, place, and manner of articulation) of the consonants being imitated; analysis of the errors produced for all consonants imitated incorrectly. Results: Seventy-six children provided a response to at least 75% of the nonword stimuli. In these children's responses, 33% of the target consonants were imitated correctly, 25% of the target consonants were deleted, and substitutions were provided for 42% of the target consonants. The children tended to correctly reproduce target consonants with coronal place (which involve a midvocal tract constriction) more often than other consonants. Poorer performers tended to produce more deletions than the better performers, but their production errors tended to follow the same patterns as the better performers. Conclusions: Poorer performance on labial consonants suggests that scores were affected by the lack of visual cues such as lip closure. Oral communication users tended to perform better than total communication users, indicating that oral communication methods are beneficial to the development of pediatric cochlear implant users' phonological processing skills.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)587-591
Number of pages5
JournalArchives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Volume130
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2004

Fingerprint

Cochlear Implants
Communication
Linguistics
Pediatrics
Lip
Constriction
Cues
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Education
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Nonword Imitation by Children with Cochlear Implants : Consonant Analyses. / Dillon, Caitlin; Pisoni, David; Cleary, Miranda; Carter, Allyson K.

In: Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Vol. 130, No. 5, 05.2004, p. 587-591.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dillon, Caitlin ; Pisoni, David ; Cleary, Miranda ; Carter, Allyson K. / Nonword Imitation by Children with Cochlear Implants : Consonant Analyses. In: Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. 2004 ; Vol. 130, No. 5. pp. 587-591.
@article{a523f9c394944d2d838f698c20f6e1c1,
title = "Nonword Imitation by Children with Cochlear Implants: Consonant Analyses",
abstract = "Objectives: To complete detailed linguistic analyses of archived recordings of pediatric cochlear implant users' imitations of nonwords; to gain insight into the children's developing phonological systems and the wide range of variability in nonword responses. Design: Nonword repetition: repetition of 20 auditory-only English-sounding nonwords. Setting: Central Institute for the Deaf {"}Education of the Deaf Child{"} research program, St Louis, Mo. Participants: Eighty-eight 8- to 10-year-old experienced pediatric cochlear implant users. Main Outcome Measures: Several different consonant accuracy scores based on the linguistic structure (voicing, place, and manner of articulation) of the consonants being imitated; analysis of the errors produced for all consonants imitated incorrectly. Results: Seventy-six children provided a response to at least 75{\%} of the nonword stimuli. In these children's responses, 33{\%} of the target consonants were imitated correctly, 25{\%} of the target consonants were deleted, and substitutions were provided for 42{\%} of the target consonants. The children tended to correctly reproduce target consonants with coronal place (which involve a midvocal tract constriction) more often than other consonants. Poorer performers tended to produce more deletions than the better performers, but their production errors tended to follow the same patterns as the better performers. Conclusions: Poorer performance on labial consonants suggests that scores were affected by the lack of visual cues such as lip closure. Oral communication users tended to perform better than total communication users, indicating that oral communication methods are beneficial to the development of pediatric cochlear implant users' phonological processing skills.",
author = "Caitlin Dillon and David Pisoni and Miranda Cleary and Carter, {Allyson K.}",
year = "2004",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1001/archotol.130.5.587",
language = "English",
volume = "130",
pages = "587--591",
journal = "JAMA Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery",
issn = "2168-6181",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nonword Imitation by Children with Cochlear Implants

T2 - Consonant Analyses

AU - Dillon, Caitlin

AU - Pisoni, David

AU - Cleary, Miranda

AU - Carter, Allyson K.

PY - 2004/5

Y1 - 2004/5

N2 - Objectives: To complete detailed linguistic analyses of archived recordings of pediatric cochlear implant users' imitations of nonwords; to gain insight into the children's developing phonological systems and the wide range of variability in nonword responses. Design: Nonword repetition: repetition of 20 auditory-only English-sounding nonwords. Setting: Central Institute for the Deaf "Education of the Deaf Child" research program, St Louis, Mo. Participants: Eighty-eight 8- to 10-year-old experienced pediatric cochlear implant users. Main Outcome Measures: Several different consonant accuracy scores based on the linguistic structure (voicing, place, and manner of articulation) of the consonants being imitated; analysis of the errors produced for all consonants imitated incorrectly. Results: Seventy-six children provided a response to at least 75% of the nonword stimuli. In these children's responses, 33% of the target consonants were imitated correctly, 25% of the target consonants were deleted, and substitutions were provided for 42% of the target consonants. The children tended to correctly reproduce target consonants with coronal place (which involve a midvocal tract constriction) more often than other consonants. Poorer performers tended to produce more deletions than the better performers, but their production errors tended to follow the same patterns as the better performers. Conclusions: Poorer performance on labial consonants suggests that scores were affected by the lack of visual cues such as lip closure. Oral communication users tended to perform better than total communication users, indicating that oral communication methods are beneficial to the development of pediatric cochlear implant users' phonological processing skills.

AB - Objectives: To complete detailed linguistic analyses of archived recordings of pediatric cochlear implant users' imitations of nonwords; to gain insight into the children's developing phonological systems and the wide range of variability in nonword responses. Design: Nonword repetition: repetition of 20 auditory-only English-sounding nonwords. Setting: Central Institute for the Deaf "Education of the Deaf Child" research program, St Louis, Mo. Participants: Eighty-eight 8- to 10-year-old experienced pediatric cochlear implant users. Main Outcome Measures: Several different consonant accuracy scores based on the linguistic structure (voicing, place, and manner of articulation) of the consonants being imitated; analysis of the errors produced for all consonants imitated incorrectly. Results: Seventy-six children provided a response to at least 75% of the nonword stimuli. In these children's responses, 33% of the target consonants were imitated correctly, 25% of the target consonants were deleted, and substitutions were provided for 42% of the target consonants. The children tended to correctly reproduce target consonants with coronal place (which involve a midvocal tract constriction) more often than other consonants. Poorer performers tended to produce more deletions than the better performers, but their production errors tended to follow the same patterns as the better performers. Conclusions: Poorer performance on labial consonants suggests that scores were affected by the lack of visual cues such as lip closure. Oral communication users tended to perform better than total communication users, indicating that oral communication methods are beneficial to the development of pediatric cochlear implant users' phonological processing skills.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2342498342&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2342498342&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/archotol.130.5.587

DO - 10.1001/archotol.130.5.587

M3 - Article

C2 - 15148181

AN - SCOPUS:2342498342

VL - 130

SP - 587

EP - 591

JO - JAMA Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

JF - JAMA Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

SN - 2168-6181

IS - 5

ER -