Not the same everywhere

Patient-centered learning environments at nine medical schools

Paul Haidet, P. Adam Kelly, Susan Bentley, Benjamin Blatt, Calvin L. Chou, Auguste H. Fortin VI, Geoffrey Gordon, Catherine Gracey, Heather Harrell, David S. Hatem, Drew Helmer, Debora A. Paterniti, Dianne Wagner, Thomas Inui

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Learning environments overtly or implicitly address patient-centered values and have been the focus of research for more than 40 years, often in studies about the "hidden curriculum." However, many of these studies occurred at single medical schools and used time-intensive ethnographic methods. This field of inquiry lacks survey methods and information about how learning environments differ across medical schools. OBJECTIVE: To examine patient-centered characteristics of learning environments at 9 U.S. medical schools. DESIGN: Cross-sectional internet-based survey. PARTICIPANTS: Eight-hundred and twenty-three third- and fourth-year medical students in the classes of 2002 and 2003. MEASUREMENTS: We measured the patient-centeredness of learning environments with the Communication, Curriculum, and Culture (C 3) Instrument, a 29-item validated measure that characterizes the degree to which a medical school's environment fosters patient-centered care. The C3 Instrument contains 3 content areas (role modeling, students' experiences, and support for students' patient-centered behaviors), and is designed to measure these areas independent of respondents' attitudes about patient-centered care. We also collected demographic and attitudinal information from respondents. RESULTS: The variability of C3 scores across schools in each of the 3 content areas of the instrument was striking and statistically significant (P values ranged from .001 to .004). In addition, the patterns of scores on the 3 content areas differed from school to school. CONCLUSIONS: The 9 schools demonstrated unique and different learning environments both in terms of magnitude and patterns of characteristics. Further multiinstitutional study of hidden curricula is needed to further establish the degree of variability that exists, and to assist educators in making informed choices about how to intervene at their own schools.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)405-409
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of General Internal Medicine
Volume21
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2006

Fingerprint

Medical Schools
Learning
Curriculum
Patient-Centered Care
Students
Medical Students
Internet
Communication
Demography
Surveys and Questionnaires
Research

Keywords

  • Culture
  • Curriculum
  • Education, medical, undergraduate
  • Organizational culture
  • Patient-centered care
  • Physician-patient relations
  • Schools, medical
  • Students, medical

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Not the same everywhere : Patient-centered learning environments at nine medical schools. / Haidet, Paul; Kelly, P. Adam; Bentley, Susan; Blatt, Benjamin; Chou, Calvin L.; Fortin VI, Auguste H.; Gordon, Geoffrey; Gracey, Catherine; Harrell, Heather; Hatem, David S.; Helmer, Drew; Paterniti, Debora A.; Wagner, Dianne; Inui, Thomas.

In: Journal of General Internal Medicine, Vol. 21, No. 5, 2006, p. 405-409.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Haidet, P, Kelly, PA, Bentley, S, Blatt, B, Chou, CL, Fortin VI, AH, Gordon, G, Gracey, C, Harrell, H, Hatem, DS, Helmer, D, Paterniti, DA, Wagner, D & Inui, T 2006, 'Not the same everywhere: Patient-centered learning environments at nine medical schools', Journal of General Internal Medicine, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 405-409. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00417.x
Haidet, Paul ; Kelly, P. Adam ; Bentley, Susan ; Blatt, Benjamin ; Chou, Calvin L. ; Fortin VI, Auguste H. ; Gordon, Geoffrey ; Gracey, Catherine ; Harrell, Heather ; Hatem, David S. ; Helmer, Drew ; Paterniti, Debora A. ; Wagner, Dianne ; Inui, Thomas. / Not the same everywhere : Patient-centered learning environments at nine medical schools. In: Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2006 ; Vol. 21, No. 5. pp. 405-409.
@article{479381bfe0e94c62acfb0a9a891872fc,
title = "Not the same everywhere: Patient-centered learning environments at nine medical schools",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Learning environments overtly or implicitly address patient-centered values and have been the focus of research for more than 40 years, often in studies about the {"}hidden curriculum.{"} However, many of these studies occurred at single medical schools and used time-intensive ethnographic methods. This field of inquiry lacks survey methods and information about how learning environments differ across medical schools. OBJECTIVE: To examine patient-centered characteristics of learning environments at 9 U.S. medical schools. DESIGN: Cross-sectional internet-based survey. PARTICIPANTS: Eight-hundred and twenty-three third- and fourth-year medical students in the classes of 2002 and 2003. MEASUREMENTS: We measured the patient-centeredness of learning environments with the Communication, Curriculum, and Culture (C 3) Instrument, a 29-item validated measure that characterizes the degree to which a medical school's environment fosters patient-centered care. The C3 Instrument contains 3 content areas (role modeling, students' experiences, and support for students' patient-centered behaviors), and is designed to measure these areas independent of respondents' attitudes about patient-centered care. We also collected demographic and attitudinal information from respondents. RESULTS: The variability of C3 scores across schools in each of the 3 content areas of the instrument was striking and statistically significant (P values ranged from .001 to .004). In addition, the patterns of scores on the 3 content areas differed from school to school. CONCLUSIONS: The 9 schools demonstrated unique and different learning environments both in terms of magnitude and patterns of characteristics. Further multiinstitutional study of hidden curricula is needed to further establish the degree of variability that exists, and to assist educators in making informed choices about how to intervene at their own schools.",
keywords = "Culture, Curriculum, Education, medical, undergraduate, Organizational culture, Patient-centered care, Physician-patient relations, Schools, medical, Students, medical",
author = "Paul Haidet and Kelly, {P. Adam} and Susan Bentley and Benjamin Blatt and Chou, {Calvin L.} and {Fortin VI}, {Auguste H.} and Geoffrey Gordon and Catherine Gracey and Heather Harrell and Hatem, {David S.} and Drew Helmer and Paterniti, {Debora A.} and Dianne Wagner and Thomas Inui",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00417.x",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "405--409",
journal = "Journal of General Internal Medicine",
issn = "0884-8734",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Not the same everywhere

T2 - Patient-centered learning environments at nine medical schools

AU - Haidet, Paul

AU - Kelly, P. Adam

AU - Bentley, Susan

AU - Blatt, Benjamin

AU - Chou, Calvin L.

AU - Fortin VI, Auguste H.

AU - Gordon, Geoffrey

AU - Gracey, Catherine

AU - Harrell, Heather

AU - Hatem, David S.

AU - Helmer, Drew

AU - Paterniti, Debora A.

AU - Wagner, Dianne

AU - Inui, Thomas

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - BACKGROUND: Learning environments overtly or implicitly address patient-centered values and have been the focus of research for more than 40 years, often in studies about the "hidden curriculum." However, many of these studies occurred at single medical schools and used time-intensive ethnographic methods. This field of inquiry lacks survey methods and information about how learning environments differ across medical schools. OBJECTIVE: To examine patient-centered characteristics of learning environments at 9 U.S. medical schools. DESIGN: Cross-sectional internet-based survey. PARTICIPANTS: Eight-hundred and twenty-three third- and fourth-year medical students in the classes of 2002 and 2003. MEASUREMENTS: We measured the patient-centeredness of learning environments with the Communication, Curriculum, and Culture (C 3) Instrument, a 29-item validated measure that characterizes the degree to which a medical school's environment fosters patient-centered care. The C3 Instrument contains 3 content areas (role modeling, students' experiences, and support for students' patient-centered behaviors), and is designed to measure these areas independent of respondents' attitudes about patient-centered care. We also collected demographic and attitudinal information from respondents. RESULTS: The variability of C3 scores across schools in each of the 3 content areas of the instrument was striking and statistically significant (P values ranged from .001 to .004). In addition, the patterns of scores on the 3 content areas differed from school to school. CONCLUSIONS: The 9 schools demonstrated unique and different learning environments both in terms of magnitude and patterns of characteristics. Further multiinstitutional study of hidden curricula is needed to further establish the degree of variability that exists, and to assist educators in making informed choices about how to intervene at their own schools.

AB - BACKGROUND: Learning environments overtly or implicitly address patient-centered values and have been the focus of research for more than 40 years, often in studies about the "hidden curriculum." However, many of these studies occurred at single medical schools and used time-intensive ethnographic methods. This field of inquiry lacks survey methods and information about how learning environments differ across medical schools. OBJECTIVE: To examine patient-centered characteristics of learning environments at 9 U.S. medical schools. DESIGN: Cross-sectional internet-based survey. PARTICIPANTS: Eight-hundred and twenty-three third- and fourth-year medical students in the classes of 2002 and 2003. MEASUREMENTS: We measured the patient-centeredness of learning environments with the Communication, Curriculum, and Culture (C 3) Instrument, a 29-item validated measure that characterizes the degree to which a medical school's environment fosters patient-centered care. The C3 Instrument contains 3 content areas (role modeling, students' experiences, and support for students' patient-centered behaviors), and is designed to measure these areas independent of respondents' attitudes about patient-centered care. We also collected demographic and attitudinal information from respondents. RESULTS: The variability of C3 scores across schools in each of the 3 content areas of the instrument was striking and statistically significant (P values ranged from .001 to .004). In addition, the patterns of scores on the 3 content areas differed from school to school. CONCLUSIONS: The 9 schools demonstrated unique and different learning environments both in terms of magnitude and patterns of characteristics. Further multiinstitutional study of hidden curricula is needed to further establish the degree of variability that exists, and to assist educators in making informed choices about how to intervene at their own schools.

KW - Culture

KW - Curriculum

KW - Education, medical, undergraduate

KW - Organizational culture

KW - Patient-centered care

KW - Physician-patient relations

KW - Schools, medical

KW - Students, medical

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745664808&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33745664808&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00417.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00417.x

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 405

EP - 409

JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine

SN - 0884-8734

IS - 5

ER -