Nursing Home Staff Palliative Care Knowledge and Practices: Results of a Large Survey of Frontline Workers

Kathleen Unroe, John G. Cagle, Kathleen A. Lane, Christopher Callahan, Susan C. Miller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Context Deficits in quality end-of-life care for nursing home (NH) residents are well known. Palliative care is promoted as an approach to improve quality. The Palliative Care Survey (PCS) is designed to measure NH staff palliative care knowledge and practice. Objectives To comparing palliative care knowledge and practices across NH staff roles using the PCS, and to examine relationships between facility characteristics and PCS scores. Methods The PCS was administered to frontline NH staff - certified nursing assistants (CNAs), licensed practical nurses (LPNs), registered nurses (RNs), and social workers (SWs) - in 51 facilities in 2012. Descriptive statistics were calculated by job role. Linear mixed effects models were used to identify facility and individual factors associated with palliative care practice and knowledge. Results The analytic sample included 1200 surveys. CNAs had significantly lower practice and knowledge scores compared to LPNs, RNs, and SWs (P <0.05). LPNs had significantly lower psychological, end-of-life, and total knowledge scores than RNs (P <0.05 for all). Although knowledge about physical symptoms was uniformly high, end-of-life knowledge was notably low for all staff. A one-point higher facility star rating was significantly associated with a 0.06 increase in family communication score (P = 0.003; 95% CI: 0.02-0.09; SE = 0.02). Higher penetration of hospice in the NH was associated with higher end-of-life knowledge (P = 0.003; parameter estimate = 0.006; 95% CI: 0.002-0.010; SE = 0.002). Sixty-two percent of respondents stated that, with additional training, they would be interested in being leaders in palliative care. Conclusion Given observed differences in palliative care practice and knowledge scores by staff training, it appears the PCS is a useful tool to assess NH staff. Low end-of-life knowledge scores represent an important target for quality improvement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)622-629
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Pain and Symptom Management
Volume50
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2015

Fingerprint

Nursing Staff
Nursing Homes
Palliative Care
Nurses
Nursing
Surveys and Questionnaires
Knowledge of Results (Psychology)
Hospice and Palliative Care Nursing
Terminal Care
Quality Improvement
Communication
Quality of Life
Psychology

Keywords

  • end of life
  • hospice
  • Nursing home
  • palliative care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Nursing Home Staff Palliative Care Knowledge and Practices : Results of a Large Survey of Frontline Workers. / Unroe, Kathleen; Cagle, John G.; Lane, Kathleen A.; Callahan, Christopher; Miller, Susan C.

In: Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, Vol. 50, No. 5, 01.11.2015, p. 622-629.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{825bd1b198894ee9807fd858a1a97bcb,
title = "Nursing Home Staff Palliative Care Knowledge and Practices: Results of a Large Survey of Frontline Workers",
abstract = "Context Deficits in quality end-of-life care for nursing home (NH) residents are well known. Palliative care is promoted as an approach to improve quality. The Palliative Care Survey (PCS) is designed to measure NH staff palliative care knowledge and practice. Objectives To comparing palliative care knowledge and practices across NH staff roles using the PCS, and to examine relationships between facility characteristics and PCS scores. Methods The PCS was administered to frontline NH staff - certified nursing assistants (CNAs), licensed practical nurses (LPNs), registered nurses (RNs), and social workers (SWs) - in 51 facilities in 2012. Descriptive statistics were calculated by job role. Linear mixed effects models were used to identify facility and individual factors associated with palliative care practice and knowledge. Results The analytic sample included 1200 surveys. CNAs had significantly lower practice and knowledge scores compared to LPNs, RNs, and SWs (P <0.05). LPNs had significantly lower psychological, end-of-life, and total knowledge scores than RNs (P <0.05 for all). Although knowledge about physical symptoms was uniformly high, end-of-life knowledge was notably low for all staff. A one-point higher facility star rating was significantly associated with a 0.06 increase in family communication score (P = 0.003; 95{\%} CI: 0.02-0.09; SE = 0.02). Higher penetration of hospice in the NH was associated with higher end-of-life knowledge (P = 0.003; parameter estimate = 0.006; 95{\%} CI: 0.002-0.010; SE = 0.002). Sixty-two percent of respondents stated that, with additional training, they would be interested in being leaders in palliative care. Conclusion Given observed differences in palliative care practice and knowledge scores by staff training, it appears the PCS is a useful tool to assess NH staff. Low end-of-life knowledge scores represent an important target for quality improvement.",
keywords = "end of life, hospice, Nursing home, palliative care",
author = "Kathleen Unroe and Cagle, {John G.} and Lane, {Kathleen A.} and Christopher Callahan and Miller, {Susan C.}",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.06.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "50",
pages = "622--629",
journal = "Journal of Pain and Symptom Management",
issn = "0885-3924",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nursing Home Staff Palliative Care Knowledge and Practices

T2 - Results of a Large Survey of Frontline Workers

AU - Unroe, Kathleen

AU - Cagle, John G.

AU - Lane, Kathleen A.

AU - Callahan, Christopher

AU - Miller, Susan C.

PY - 2015/11/1

Y1 - 2015/11/1

N2 - Context Deficits in quality end-of-life care for nursing home (NH) residents are well known. Palliative care is promoted as an approach to improve quality. The Palliative Care Survey (PCS) is designed to measure NH staff palliative care knowledge and practice. Objectives To comparing palliative care knowledge and practices across NH staff roles using the PCS, and to examine relationships between facility characteristics and PCS scores. Methods The PCS was administered to frontline NH staff - certified nursing assistants (CNAs), licensed practical nurses (LPNs), registered nurses (RNs), and social workers (SWs) - in 51 facilities in 2012. Descriptive statistics were calculated by job role. Linear mixed effects models were used to identify facility and individual factors associated with palliative care practice and knowledge. Results The analytic sample included 1200 surveys. CNAs had significantly lower practice and knowledge scores compared to LPNs, RNs, and SWs (P <0.05). LPNs had significantly lower psychological, end-of-life, and total knowledge scores than RNs (P <0.05 for all). Although knowledge about physical symptoms was uniformly high, end-of-life knowledge was notably low for all staff. A one-point higher facility star rating was significantly associated with a 0.06 increase in family communication score (P = 0.003; 95% CI: 0.02-0.09; SE = 0.02). Higher penetration of hospice in the NH was associated with higher end-of-life knowledge (P = 0.003; parameter estimate = 0.006; 95% CI: 0.002-0.010; SE = 0.002). Sixty-two percent of respondents stated that, with additional training, they would be interested in being leaders in palliative care. Conclusion Given observed differences in palliative care practice and knowledge scores by staff training, it appears the PCS is a useful tool to assess NH staff. Low end-of-life knowledge scores represent an important target for quality improvement.

AB - Context Deficits in quality end-of-life care for nursing home (NH) residents are well known. Palliative care is promoted as an approach to improve quality. The Palliative Care Survey (PCS) is designed to measure NH staff palliative care knowledge and practice. Objectives To comparing palliative care knowledge and practices across NH staff roles using the PCS, and to examine relationships between facility characteristics and PCS scores. Methods The PCS was administered to frontline NH staff - certified nursing assistants (CNAs), licensed practical nurses (LPNs), registered nurses (RNs), and social workers (SWs) - in 51 facilities in 2012. Descriptive statistics were calculated by job role. Linear mixed effects models were used to identify facility and individual factors associated with palliative care practice and knowledge. Results The analytic sample included 1200 surveys. CNAs had significantly lower practice and knowledge scores compared to LPNs, RNs, and SWs (P <0.05). LPNs had significantly lower psychological, end-of-life, and total knowledge scores than RNs (P <0.05 for all). Although knowledge about physical symptoms was uniformly high, end-of-life knowledge was notably low for all staff. A one-point higher facility star rating was significantly associated with a 0.06 increase in family communication score (P = 0.003; 95% CI: 0.02-0.09; SE = 0.02). Higher penetration of hospice in the NH was associated with higher end-of-life knowledge (P = 0.003; parameter estimate = 0.006; 95% CI: 0.002-0.010; SE = 0.002). Sixty-two percent of respondents stated that, with additional training, they would be interested in being leaders in palliative care. Conclusion Given observed differences in palliative care practice and knowledge scores by staff training, it appears the PCS is a useful tool to assess NH staff. Low end-of-life knowledge scores represent an important target for quality improvement.

KW - end of life

KW - hospice

KW - Nursing home

KW - palliative care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945451386&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84945451386&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.06.006

DO - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.06.006

M3 - Article

C2 - 26150325

AN - SCOPUS:84945451386

VL - 50

SP - 622

EP - 629

JO - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

JF - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

SN - 0885-3924

IS - 5

ER -