Nursing home staffing standards: Their relationship to nurse staffing levels

Christine Mueller, Gregory Arling, Robert Kane, Julie Bershadsky, Diane Holland, Annika Joy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

63 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: This study reviews staffing standards from the 50 states and the District of Columbia to determine if these standards are related to nursing home staffing levels. Design and Methods: Rules and regulations for states' nursing home staffing standards were obtained for the 50 states and the District of Columbia. Nurse staffing data were obtained from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services On-Line Survey, Certification, and Reporting (known as OSCAR) database. The minimum hours per resident day (HPRD) staffing standards for each state were categorized according to the following: no state-specific HPRD standard (adheres only to federal staffing guidelines); low HPRD standard (≤ 2.5 HPRD); and high HPRD standard (> 2.5 HPRD). A series of hierarchical linear models examined the relationships between state staffing standards and actual facility staffing (total, licensed, and certified nurse aide HPRD), using a number of covariates. Results: The variance in facility staffing was much greater within than between states. Facilities in states with high staffing standards had somewhat higher staffing than states with no standards or low standards, whereas facility staffing in states with low standards was not significantly different from that in states with no standards. Other factors, such as resident acuity and average state Medicaid rate, also were related to staffing. Implications: State staffing standards may not be effective policy tools because they are only one of many factors that affect facility staffing levels. Setting a low minimum HPRD standard may fail to raise staffing, or it may even have a dampening effect on staffing rates in facilities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)74-80
Number of pages7
JournalGerontologist
Volume46
Issue number1
StatePublished - Feb 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Nursing Homes
Nurses
Nurses' Aides
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (U.S.)
Medicaid
Certification
Linear Models

Keywords

  • Nursing home
  • Policy
  • Quality of care
  • Staffing levels
  • State standards

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Aging

Cite this

Mueller, C., Arling, G., Kane, R., Bershadsky, J., Holland, D., & Joy, A. (2006). Nursing home staffing standards: Their relationship to nurse staffing levels. Gerontologist, 46(1), 74-80.

Nursing home staffing standards : Their relationship to nurse staffing levels. / Mueller, Christine; Arling, Gregory; Kane, Robert; Bershadsky, Julie; Holland, Diane; Joy, Annika.

In: Gerontologist, Vol. 46, No. 1, 02.2006, p. 74-80.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mueller, C, Arling, G, Kane, R, Bershadsky, J, Holland, D & Joy, A 2006, 'Nursing home staffing standards: Their relationship to nurse staffing levels', Gerontologist, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 74-80.
Mueller C, Arling G, Kane R, Bershadsky J, Holland D, Joy A. Nursing home staffing standards: Their relationship to nurse staffing levels. Gerontologist. 2006 Feb;46(1):74-80.
Mueller, Christine ; Arling, Gregory ; Kane, Robert ; Bershadsky, Julie ; Holland, Diane ; Joy, Annika. / Nursing home staffing standards : Their relationship to nurse staffing levels. In: Gerontologist. 2006 ; Vol. 46, No. 1. pp. 74-80.
@article{adefdd4f84174028957254860fee7755,
title = "Nursing home staffing standards: Their relationship to nurse staffing levels",
abstract = "Purpose: This study reviews staffing standards from the 50 states and the District of Columbia to determine if these standards are related to nursing home staffing levels. Design and Methods: Rules and regulations for states' nursing home staffing standards were obtained for the 50 states and the District of Columbia. Nurse staffing data were obtained from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services On-Line Survey, Certification, and Reporting (known as OSCAR) database. The minimum hours per resident day (HPRD) staffing standards for each state were categorized according to the following: no state-specific HPRD standard (adheres only to federal staffing guidelines); low HPRD standard (≤ 2.5 HPRD); and high HPRD standard (> 2.5 HPRD). A series of hierarchical linear models examined the relationships between state staffing standards and actual facility staffing (total, licensed, and certified nurse aide HPRD), using a number of covariates. Results: The variance in facility staffing was much greater within than between states. Facilities in states with high staffing standards had somewhat higher staffing than states with no standards or low standards, whereas facility staffing in states with low standards was not significantly different from that in states with no standards. Other factors, such as resident acuity and average state Medicaid rate, also were related to staffing. Implications: State staffing standards may not be effective policy tools because they are only one of many factors that affect facility staffing levels. Setting a low minimum HPRD standard may fail to raise staffing, or it may even have a dampening effect on staffing rates in facilities.",
keywords = "Nursing home, Policy, Quality of care, Staffing levels, State standards",
author = "Christine Mueller and Gregory Arling and Robert Kane and Julie Bershadsky and Diane Holland and Annika Joy",
year = "2006",
month = "2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "74--80",
journal = "The Gerontologist",
issn = "0016-9013",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nursing home staffing standards

T2 - Their relationship to nurse staffing levels

AU - Mueller, Christine

AU - Arling, Gregory

AU - Kane, Robert

AU - Bershadsky, Julie

AU - Holland, Diane

AU - Joy, Annika

PY - 2006/2

Y1 - 2006/2

N2 - Purpose: This study reviews staffing standards from the 50 states and the District of Columbia to determine if these standards are related to nursing home staffing levels. Design and Methods: Rules and regulations for states' nursing home staffing standards were obtained for the 50 states and the District of Columbia. Nurse staffing data were obtained from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services On-Line Survey, Certification, and Reporting (known as OSCAR) database. The minimum hours per resident day (HPRD) staffing standards for each state were categorized according to the following: no state-specific HPRD standard (adheres only to federal staffing guidelines); low HPRD standard (≤ 2.5 HPRD); and high HPRD standard (> 2.5 HPRD). A series of hierarchical linear models examined the relationships between state staffing standards and actual facility staffing (total, licensed, and certified nurse aide HPRD), using a number of covariates. Results: The variance in facility staffing was much greater within than between states. Facilities in states with high staffing standards had somewhat higher staffing than states with no standards or low standards, whereas facility staffing in states with low standards was not significantly different from that in states with no standards. Other factors, such as resident acuity and average state Medicaid rate, also were related to staffing. Implications: State staffing standards may not be effective policy tools because they are only one of many factors that affect facility staffing levels. Setting a low minimum HPRD standard may fail to raise staffing, or it may even have a dampening effect on staffing rates in facilities.

AB - Purpose: This study reviews staffing standards from the 50 states and the District of Columbia to determine if these standards are related to nursing home staffing levels. Design and Methods: Rules and regulations for states' nursing home staffing standards were obtained for the 50 states and the District of Columbia. Nurse staffing data were obtained from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services On-Line Survey, Certification, and Reporting (known as OSCAR) database. The minimum hours per resident day (HPRD) staffing standards for each state were categorized according to the following: no state-specific HPRD standard (adheres only to federal staffing guidelines); low HPRD standard (≤ 2.5 HPRD); and high HPRD standard (> 2.5 HPRD). A series of hierarchical linear models examined the relationships between state staffing standards and actual facility staffing (total, licensed, and certified nurse aide HPRD), using a number of covariates. Results: The variance in facility staffing was much greater within than between states. Facilities in states with high staffing standards had somewhat higher staffing than states with no standards or low standards, whereas facility staffing in states with low standards was not significantly different from that in states with no standards. Other factors, such as resident acuity and average state Medicaid rate, also were related to staffing. Implications: State staffing standards may not be effective policy tools because they are only one of many factors that affect facility staffing levels. Setting a low minimum HPRD standard may fail to raise staffing, or it may even have a dampening effect on staffing rates in facilities.

KW - Nursing home

KW - Policy

KW - Quality of care

KW - Staffing levels

KW - State standards

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=32244438718&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=32244438718&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 16452286

AN - SCOPUS:32244438718

VL - 46

SP - 74

EP - 80

JO - The Gerontologist

JF - The Gerontologist

SN - 0016-9013

IS - 1

ER -