Objective structured clinical exams

A critical review

John L. Turner, Mary Dankoski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

101 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Since their inception in the 1970s, objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) have become popular and now are part of the US Medical Licensing Examination for all US medical graduates. Despite general acceptance of this method, there is debate over the value of OSCE testing compared to more traditional methods. A review of reliability and validity research does not clearly show superiority of OSCE testing. To use OSCEs in a valid and reliable way, attention must be paid to test content, test design, and implementation factors, especially when the results will be used for high-stakes decision making. While questions remain around the application of OSCE testing, there are also both known and hidden benefits to students, faculty, and organizations that use OSCEs. This paper reviews the pros and cons of the OSCE method and outlines important issues for medical educators to consider when planning to use OSCEs in their programs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)574-578
Number of pages5
JournalFamily Medicine
Volume40
Issue number8
StatePublished - Sep 2008

Fingerprint

Licensure
Reproducibility of Results
Decision Making
Organizations
Students
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Objective structured clinical exams : A critical review. / Turner, John L.; Dankoski, Mary.

In: Family Medicine, Vol. 40, No. 8, 09.2008, p. 574-578.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Turner, John L. ; Dankoski, Mary. / Objective structured clinical exams : A critical review. In: Family Medicine. 2008 ; Vol. 40, No. 8. pp. 574-578.
@article{03c6f88c722a4ecab3bd0ea8607960c0,
title = "Objective structured clinical exams: A critical review",
abstract = "Since their inception in the 1970s, objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) have become popular and now are part of the US Medical Licensing Examination for all US medical graduates. Despite general acceptance of this method, there is debate over the value of OSCE testing compared to more traditional methods. A review of reliability and validity research does not clearly show superiority of OSCE testing. To use OSCEs in a valid and reliable way, attention must be paid to test content, test design, and implementation factors, especially when the results will be used for high-stakes decision making. While questions remain around the application of OSCE testing, there are also both known and hidden benefits to students, faculty, and organizations that use OSCEs. This paper reviews the pros and cons of the OSCE method and outlines important issues for medical educators to consider when planning to use OSCEs in their programs.",
author = "Turner, {John L.} and Mary Dankoski",
year = "2008",
month = "9",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "574--578",
journal = "Family Medicine",
issn = "0742-3225",
publisher = "Society of Teachers of Family Medicine",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Objective structured clinical exams

T2 - A critical review

AU - Turner, John L.

AU - Dankoski, Mary

PY - 2008/9

Y1 - 2008/9

N2 - Since their inception in the 1970s, objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) have become popular and now are part of the US Medical Licensing Examination for all US medical graduates. Despite general acceptance of this method, there is debate over the value of OSCE testing compared to more traditional methods. A review of reliability and validity research does not clearly show superiority of OSCE testing. To use OSCEs in a valid and reliable way, attention must be paid to test content, test design, and implementation factors, especially when the results will be used for high-stakes decision making. While questions remain around the application of OSCE testing, there are also both known and hidden benefits to students, faculty, and organizations that use OSCEs. This paper reviews the pros and cons of the OSCE method and outlines important issues for medical educators to consider when planning to use OSCEs in their programs.

AB - Since their inception in the 1970s, objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) have become popular and now are part of the US Medical Licensing Examination for all US medical graduates. Despite general acceptance of this method, there is debate over the value of OSCE testing compared to more traditional methods. A review of reliability and validity research does not clearly show superiority of OSCE testing. To use OSCEs in a valid and reliable way, attention must be paid to test content, test design, and implementation factors, especially when the results will be used for high-stakes decision making. While questions remain around the application of OSCE testing, there are also both known and hidden benefits to students, faculty, and organizations that use OSCEs. This paper reviews the pros and cons of the OSCE method and outlines important issues for medical educators to consider when planning to use OSCEs in their programs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=51349152053&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=51349152053&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 574

EP - 578

JO - Family Medicine

JF - Family Medicine

SN - 0742-3225

IS - 8

ER -