Obstetric decision-making and counseling at the limits of viability

Brownsne Tucker Edmonds, Sarah Krasny, Sindhu Srinivas, Judy Shea

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine factors that influence obstetric decision-making and counseling for periviable deliveries and to describe counseling challenges. Study Design: Twenty-one semistructured interviews were conducted with obstetricians who were recruited from 5 academic medical centers in Philadelphia. Two trained reviewers independently coded transcripts using grounded theory methods. Research software facilitated qualitative analysis. Results: Circumscribed by institutional norms and clinical acuity, obstetric decision-making and counseling were influenced primarily by patient preferences. Perspectives on patient autonomy guided approaches to counseling. Thresholds for intervention varied from "attending to attending" and "institution to institution." Sociodemographic factors were not believed to influence clinical decision-making. However, obstetricians admittedly managed in vitro fertilization pregnancies more aggressively. Communicating uncertainty, managing expectations, assessing understanding, and relaying consistent messages across specialties were frequently described counseling challenges for obstetricians. Conclusion: The impact of institutional variation and in vitro fertilization on periviable decision-making warrants further consideration. Interventions to train and support obstetricians in communicating uncertainty, managing expectations, and assessing values and understanding are needed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume206
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Obstetrics
Counseling
Decision Making
Fertilization in Vitro
Uncertainty
Patient Preference
Software
Interviews
Pregnancy
Research

Keywords

  • communication
  • decision-making
  • periviability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Obstetric decision-making and counseling at the limits of viability. / Tucker Edmonds, Brownsne; Krasny, Sarah; Srinivas, Sindhu; Shea, Judy.

In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 206, No. 3, 03.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6edbe0ee5c8c4f27809e5e9c87c7fcb0,
title = "Obstetric decision-making and counseling at the limits of viability",
abstract = "Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine factors that influence obstetric decision-making and counseling for periviable deliveries and to describe counseling challenges. Study Design: Twenty-one semistructured interviews were conducted with obstetricians who were recruited from 5 academic medical centers in Philadelphia. Two trained reviewers independently coded transcripts using grounded theory methods. Research software facilitated qualitative analysis. Results: Circumscribed by institutional norms and clinical acuity, obstetric decision-making and counseling were influenced primarily by patient preferences. Perspectives on patient autonomy guided approaches to counseling. Thresholds for intervention varied from {"}attending to attending{"} and {"}institution to institution.{"} Sociodemographic factors were not believed to influence clinical decision-making. However, obstetricians admittedly managed in vitro fertilization pregnancies more aggressively. Communicating uncertainty, managing expectations, assessing understanding, and relaying consistent messages across specialties were frequently described counseling challenges for obstetricians. Conclusion: The impact of institutional variation and in vitro fertilization on periviable decision-making warrants further consideration. Interventions to train and support obstetricians in communicating uncertainty, managing expectations, and assessing values and understanding are needed.",
keywords = "communication, decision-making, periviability",
author = "{Tucker Edmonds}, Brownsne and Sarah Krasny and Sindhu Srinivas and Judy Shea",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajog.2011.11.011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "206",
journal = "American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0002-9378",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Obstetric decision-making and counseling at the limits of viability

AU - Tucker Edmonds, Brownsne

AU - Krasny, Sarah

AU - Srinivas, Sindhu

AU - Shea, Judy

PY - 2012/3

Y1 - 2012/3

N2 - Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine factors that influence obstetric decision-making and counseling for periviable deliveries and to describe counseling challenges. Study Design: Twenty-one semistructured interviews were conducted with obstetricians who were recruited from 5 academic medical centers in Philadelphia. Two trained reviewers independently coded transcripts using grounded theory methods. Research software facilitated qualitative analysis. Results: Circumscribed by institutional norms and clinical acuity, obstetric decision-making and counseling were influenced primarily by patient preferences. Perspectives on patient autonomy guided approaches to counseling. Thresholds for intervention varied from "attending to attending" and "institution to institution." Sociodemographic factors were not believed to influence clinical decision-making. However, obstetricians admittedly managed in vitro fertilization pregnancies more aggressively. Communicating uncertainty, managing expectations, assessing understanding, and relaying consistent messages across specialties were frequently described counseling challenges for obstetricians. Conclusion: The impact of institutional variation and in vitro fertilization on periviable decision-making warrants further consideration. Interventions to train and support obstetricians in communicating uncertainty, managing expectations, and assessing values and understanding are needed.

AB - Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine factors that influence obstetric decision-making and counseling for periviable deliveries and to describe counseling challenges. Study Design: Twenty-one semistructured interviews were conducted with obstetricians who were recruited from 5 academic medical centers in Philadelphia. Two trained reviewers independently coded transcripts using grounded theory methods. Research software facilitated qualitative analysis. Results: Circumscribed by institutional norms and clinical acuity, obstetric decision-making and counseling were influenced primarily by patient preferences. Perspectives on patient autonomy guided approaches to counseling. Thresholds for intervention varied from "attending to attending" and "institution to institution." Sociodemographic factors were not believed to influence clinical decision-making. However, obstetricians admittedly managed in vitro fertilization pregnancies more aggressively. Communicating uncertainty, managing expectations, assessing understanding, and relaying consistent messages across specialties were frequently described counseling challenges for obstetricians. Conclusion: The impact of institutional variation and in vitro fertilization on periviable decision-making warrants further consideration. Interventions to train and support obstetricians in communicating uncertainty, managing expectations, and assessing values and understanding are needed.

KW - communication

KW - decision-making

KW - periviability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857722121&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84857722121&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.11.011

DO - 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.11.011

M3 - Article

C2 - 22381606

AN - SCOPUS:84857722121

VL - 206

JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0002-9378

IS - 3

ER -