Older adults and forgoing cancer screening

"I think it would be strange"

Alexia Torke, Peter Schwartz, Laura R. Holtz, Kianna Montz, Greg Sachs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Importance: Although there is a growing recognition that older adults and those with extensive comorbid conditions undergo cancer screening too frequently, there is little information about patients' perceptions regarding cessation of cancer screening. Information on older adults' views of screening cessation would be helpful both for clinicians and for those designing interventions to reduce overscreening. Objective: To obtain a deeper understanding of older adults' perspectives on screening cessation and their experiences communicating with clinicians about this topic. Design: Semistructured interview study. Setting: Senior health center affiliated with an urban hospital. Participants: We interviewed 33 older adults presenting to a senior health center. Their median age was 76 years (range, 63-91 years). Of the 33 participants, 27 were women; 15 were African American, 16 were white, 1 was Asian, and 1 was American Indian. Main Outcome Measures: We transcribed audio recordings of interviews and analyzed them using methods of grounded theory to identify themes and illustrative quotes. Results: Undergoing screening tests was perceived by participants as morally obligatory. Although many saw continued screening as a habit or custom not involving any decision, cessation of screening would require a major decision. Many asserted that they had never discussed screening cessation with their physicians or considered stopping on their own; some reported being upset when their physician recommended stopping. Although some would accept a physician's strong recommendation to stop, others thought that such a physician's recommendation would threaten trust or lead them to get another opinion. Participants were skeptical about the role of statistics and the recommendations of government panels in screening decisions but were more favorable toward stopping because of the balance of risks and benefits, complications, or test burdens. Conclusions and Relevance: For many older adults, stopping screening is a major decision, but continuing screening is not. A physician's recommendation to stop may threaten patient trust. Effective strategies to reduce nonbeneficial screening may include discussion of the balance of risks and benefits, complications, or burdens.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)526-531
Number of pages6
JournalJAMA Internal Medicine
Volume173
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 8 2013

Fingerprint

Early Detection of Cancer
Physicians
Senior Centers
Interviews
North American Indians
Urban Hospitals
Health
African Americans
Habits
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Older adults and forgoing cancer screening : "I think it would be strange". / Torke, Alexia; Schwartz, Peter; Holtz, Laura R.; Montz, Kianna; Sachs, Greg.

In: JAMA Internal Medicine, Vol. 173, No. 7, 08.04.2013, p. 526-531.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fb2f345d1d3f4fa690bf90ed54afb346,
title = "Older adults and forgoing cancer screening: {"}I think it would be strange{"}",
abstract = "Importance: Although there is a growing recognition that older adults and those with extensive comorbid conditions undergo cancer screening too frequently, there is little information about patients' perceptions regarding cessation of cancer screening. Information on older adults' views of screening cessation would be helpful both for clinicians and for those designing interventions to reduce overscreening. Objective: To obtain a deeper understanding of older adults' perspectives on screening cessation and their experiences communicating with clinicians about this topic. Design: Semistructured interview study. Setting: Senior health center affiliated with an urban hospital. Participants: We interviewed 33 older adults presenting to a senior health center. Their median age was 76 years (range, 63-91 years). Of the 33 participants, 27 were women; 15 were African American, 16 were white, 1 was Asian, and 1 was American Indian. Main Outcome Measures: We transcribed audio recordings of interviews and analyzed them using methods of grounded theory to identify themes and illustrative quotes. Results: Undergoing screening tests was perceived by participants as morally obligatory. Although many saw continued screening as a habit or custom not involving any decision, cessation of screening would require a major decision. Many asserted that they had never discussed screening cessation with their physicians or considered stopping on their own; some reported being upset when their physician recommended stopping. Although some would accept a physician's strong recommendation to stop, others thought that such a physician's recommendation would threaten trust or lead them to get another opinion. Participants were skeptical about the role of statistics and the recommendations of government panels in screening decisions but were more favorable toward stopping because of the balance of risks and benefits, complications, or test burdens. Conclusions and Relevance: For many older adults, stopping screening is a major decision, but continuing screening is not. A physician's recommendation to stop may threaten patient trust. Effective strategies to reduce nonbeneficial screening may include discussion of the balance of risks and benefits, complications, or burdens.",
author = "Alexia Torke and Peter Schwartz and Holtz, {Laura R.} and Kianna Montz and Greg Sachs",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.2903",
language = "English",
volume = "173",
pages = "526--531",
journal = "JAMA Internal Medicine",
issn = "2168-6106",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Older adults and forgoing cancer screening

T2 - "I think it would be strange"

AU - Torke, Alexia

AU - Schwartz, Peter

AU - Holtz, Laura R.

AU - Montz, Kianna

AU - Sachs, Greg

PY - 2013/4/8

Y1 - 2013/4/8

N2 - Importance: Although there is a growing recognition that older adults and those with extensive comorbid conditions undergo cancer screening too frequently, there is little information about patients' perceptions regarding cessation of cancer screening. Information on older adults' views of screening cessation would be helpful both for clinicians and for those designing interventions to reduce overscreening. Objective: To obtain a deeper understanding of older adults' perspectives on screening cessation and their experiences communicating with clinicians about this topic. Design: Semistructured interview study. Setting: Senior health center affiliated with an urban hospital. Participants: We interviewed 33 older adults presenting to a senior health center. Their median age was 76 years (range, 63-91 years). Of the 33 participants, 27 were women; 15 were African American, 16 were white, 1 was Asian, and 1 was American Indian. Main Outcome Measures: We transcribed audio recordings of interviews and analyzed them using methods of grounded theory to identify themes and illustrative quotes. Results: Undergoing screening tests was perceived by participants as morally obligatory. Although many saw continued screening as a habit or custom not involving any decision, cessation of screening would require a major decision. Many asserted that they had never discussed screening cessation with their physicians or considered stopping on their own; some reported being upset when their physician recommended stopping. Although some would accept a physician's strong recommendation to stop, others thought that such a physician's recommendation would threaten trust or lead them to get another opinion. Participants were skeptical about the role of statistics and the recommendations of government panels in screening decisions but were more favorable toward stopping because of the balance of risks and benefits, complications, or test burdens. Conclusions and Relevance: For many older adults, stopping screening is a major decision, but continuing screening is not. A physician's recommendation to stop may threaten patient trust. Effective strategies to reduce nonbeneficial screening may include discussion of the balance of risks and benefits, complications, or burdens.

AB - Importance: Although there is a growing recognition that older adults and those with extensive comorbid conditions undergo cancer screening too frequently, there is little information about patients' perceptions regarding cessation of cancer screening. Information on older adults' views of screening cessation would be helpful both for clinicians and for those designing interventions to reduce overscreening. Objective: To obtain a deeper understanding of older adults' perspectives on screening cessation and their experiences communicating with clinicians about this topic. Design: Semistructured interview study. Setting: Senior health center affiliated with an urban hospital. Participants: We interviewed 33 older adults presenting to a senior health center. Their median age was 76 years (range, 63-91 years). Of the 33 participants, 27 were women; 15 were African American, 16 were white, 1 was Asian, and 1 was American Indian. Main Outcome Measures: We transcribed audio recordings of interviews and analyzed them using methods of grounded theory to identify themes and illustrative quotes. Results: Undergoing screening tests was perceived by participants as morally obligatory. Although many saw continued screening as a habit or custom not involving any decision, cessation of screening would require a major decision. Many asserted that they had never discussed screening cessation with their physicians or considered stopping on their own; some reported being upset when their physician recommended stopping. Although some would accept a physician's strong recommendation to stop, others thought that such a physician's recommendation would threaten trust or lead them to get another opinion. Participants were skeptical about the role of statistics and the recommendations of government panels in screening decisions but were more favorable toward stopping because of the balance of risks and benefits, complications, or test burdens. Conclusions and Relevance: For many older adults, stopping screening is a major decision, but continuing screening is not. A physician's recommendation to stop may threaten patient trust. Effective strategies to reduce nonbeneficial screening may include discussion of the balance of risks and benefits, complications, or burdens.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876054911&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84876054911&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.2903

DO - 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.2903

M3 - Article

VL - 173

SP - 526

EP - 531

JO - JAMA Internal Medicine

JF - JAMA Internal Medicine

SN - 2168-6106

IS - 7

ER -