On Placement, Location and Orientation of Wrist-Worn Tri-Axial Accelerometers during Free-Living Measurements

Marcin Straczkiewicz, Nancy W. Glynn, Jaroslaw Harezlak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Wearable accelerometers have recently become a standalone tool for the objective assessment of physical activity (PA). In free-living studies, accelerometers are placed by protocol on a pre-defined body location (e.g., non-dominant wrist). However, the protocol is not always followed, e.g., the sensor can be moved between wrists or reattached in a different orientation. Such protocol violations often result in PA miscalculation. We propose an approach, PLOE ("Placement, Location and Orientation Evaluation method"), to determine the sensor position using statistical features from the raw accelerometer measurements. We compare the estimated position with the study protocol and identify discrepancies. We apply PLOE to the measurements collected from 45 older adults who wore ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometers on the left and right wrist for seven days. We found that 15.6% of participants who wore accelerometers violated the protocol for one or more days. The sensors were worn on the wrong hand during 6.9% of the days of simultaneous wearing of devices. During the periods of discrepancies, the daily PA was miscalculated by more than 20%. Our findings show that correct placement of the device has a significant effect on the PA estimates. These results demonstrate a need for the evaluation of sensor position.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalSensors (Basel, Switzerland)
Volume19
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - May 6 2019

Fingerprint

wrist
accelerometers
Wrist
Accelerometers
Sensors
Equipment and Supplies
sensors
Wear of materials
evaluation
Hand
estimates

Keywords

  • ActiGraph GT3X+
  • physical activity
  • sensor position
  • wearable computing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
  • Biochemistry
  • Instrumentation
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Cite this

On Placement, Location and Orientation of Wrist-Worn Tri-Axial Accelerometers during Free-Living Measurements. / Straczkiewicz, Marcin; Glynn, Nancy W.; Harezlak, Jaroslaw.

In: Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), Vol. 19, No. 9, 06.05.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{330abf17ddb747daaeddba62668d57ff,
title = "On Placement, Location and Orientation of Wrist-Worn Tri-Axial Accelerometers during Free-Living Measurements",
abstract = "Wearable accelerometers have recently become a standalone tool for the objective assessment of physical activity (PA). In free-living studies, accelerometers are placed by protocol on a pre-defined body location (e.g., non-dominant wrist). However, the protocol is not always followed, e.g., the sensor can be moved between wrists or reattached in a different orientation. Such protocol violations often result in PA miscalculation. We propose an approach, PLOE ({"}Placement, Location and Orientation Evaluation method{"}), to determine the sensor position using statistical features from the raw accelerometer measurements. We compare the estimated position with the study protocol and identify discrepancies. We apply PLOE to the measurements collected from 45 older adults who wore ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometers on the left and right wrist for seven days. We found that 15.6{\%} of participants who wore accelerometers violated the protocol for one or more days. The sensors were worn on the wrong hand during 6.9{\%} of the days of simultaneous wearing of devices. During the periods of discrepancies, the daily PA was miscalculated by more than 20{\%}. Our findings show that correct placement of the device has a significant effect on the PA estimates. These results demonstrate a need for the evaluation of sensor position.",
keywords = "ActiGraph GT3X+, physical activity, sensor position, wearable computing",
author = "Marcin Straczkiewicz and Glynn, {Nancy W.} and Jaroslaw Harezlak",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "6",
doi = "10.3390/s19092095",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
journal = "Sensors",
issn = "1424-3210",
publisher = "Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On Placement, Location and Orientation of Wrist-Worn Tri-Axial Accelerometers during Free-Living Measurements

AU - Straczkiewicz, Marcin

AU - Glynn, Nancy W.

AU - Harezlak, Jaroslaw

PY - 2019/5/6

Y1 - 2019/5/6

N2 - Wearable accelerometers have recently become a standalone tool for the objective assessment of physical activity (PA). In free-living studies, accelerometers are placed by protocol on a pre-defined body location (e.g., non-dominant wrist). However, the protocol is not always followed, e.g., the sensor can be moved between wrists or reattached in a different orientation. Such protocol violations often result in PA miscalculation. We propose an approach, PLOE ("Placement, Location and Orientation Evaluation method"), to determine the sensor position using statistical features from the raw accelerometer measurements. We compare the estimated position with the study protocol and identify discrepancies. We apply PLOE to the measurements collected from 45 older adults who wore ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometers on the left and right wrist for seven days. We found that 15.6% of participants who wore accelerometers violated the protocol for one or more days. The sensors were worn on the wrong hand during 6.9% of the days of simultaneous wearing of devices. During the periods of discrepancies, the daily PA was miscalculated by more than 20%. Our findings show that correct placement of the device has a significant effect on the PA estimates. These results demonstrate a need for the evaluation of sensor position.

AB - Wearable accelerometers have recently become a standalone tool for the objective assessment of physical activity (PA). In free-living studies, accelerometers are placed by protocol on a pre-defined body location (e.g., non-dominant wrist). However, the protocol is not always followed, e.g., the sensor can be moved between wrists or reattached in a different orientation. Such protocol violations often result in PA miscalculation. We propose an approach, PLOE ("Placement, Location and Orientation Evaluation method"), to determine the sensor position using statistical features from the raw accelerometer measurements. We compare the estimated position with the study protocol and identify discrepancies. We apply PLOE to the measurements collected from 45 older adults who wore ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometers on the left and right wrist for seven days. We found that 15.6% of participants who wore accelerometers violated the protocol for one or more days. The sensors were worn on the wrong hand during 6.9% of the days of simultaneous wearing of devices. During the periods of discrepancies, the daily PA was miscalculated by more than 20%. Our findings show that correct placement of the device has a significant effect on the PA estimates. These results demonstrate a need for the evaluation of sensor position.

KW - ActiGraph GT3X+

KW - physical activity

KW - sensor position

KW - wearable computing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065797163&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065797163&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/s19092095

DO - 10.3390/s19092095

M3 - Article

C2 - 31064100

AN - SCOPUS:85065797163

VL - 19

JO - Sensors

JF - Sensors

SN - 1424-3210

IS - 9

ER -