Oncology nurses' attitudes toward prognosis-related communication: A pilot mailed survey of oncology nursing society members

Paul Helft, Amy Chamness, Colin Terry, Margaret Uhrich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose/Objectives: To assess oncology nurses' attitudes toward prognosis-related communication and experiences of the quality of such communication among physicians. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Nationwide survey in the United States. Sample: 394 Oncology Nursing Society members who completed surveys. Methods: Pilot mailed survey. Main Research Variables: Demographic variables, measures of attitudes toward and experiences of prognosis-related communication. Findings: Nurses had mixed views of prognosis-related communication and identified common barriers to their own more effective participation in prognosis-related communication. Nurses with more experience and those who worked in inpatient settings were more likely to be present for physicians' prognosis-related communication with patients. Conclusions: Respondents identified uncertainties regarding the scope of oncology nurses' role in prognosis-related communication. Respondents also identified opportunities for improved interdisciplinary communication, most importantly the inclusion of oncology nurses in prognosis-related communication. Implications for Nursing: Opportunities for oncology nurses to bridge some gaps in prognosis-related communication likely exist, although barriers surrounding nurses' role, education, and communication within the context of the larger healthcare team need to be clarified if potential solutions are to be developed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)468-474
Number of pages7
JournalOncology Nursing Forum
Volume38
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2011

Fingerprint

Nursing Societies
Oncology Nursing
Nurses
Communication
Nurse's Role
Interdisciplinary Communication
Surveys and Questionnaires
Physicians
Patient Care Team
Uncertainty
Inpatients

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology(nursing)

Cite this

Oncology nurses' attitudes toward prognosis-related communication : A pilot mailed survey of oncology nursing society members. / Helft, Paul; Chamness, Amy; Terry, Colin; Uhrich, Margaret.

In: Oncology Nursing Forum, Vol. 38, No. 4, 07.2011, p. 468-474.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a6990aa1e9a6486d9e66f1ff3992ceb5,
title = "Oncology nurses' attitudes toward prognosis-related communication: A pilot mailed survey of oncology nursing society members",
abstract = "Purpose/Objectives: To assess oncology nurses' attitudes toward prognosis-related communication and experiences of the quality of such communication among physicians. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Nationwide survey in the United States. Sample: 394 Oncology Nursing Society members who completed surveys. Methods: Pilot mailed survey. Main Research Variables: Demographic variables, measures of attitudes toward and experiences of prognosis-related communication. Findings: Nurses had mixed views of prognosis-related communication and identified common barriers to their own more effective participation in prognosis-related communication. Nurses with more experience and those who worked in inpatient settings were more likely to be present for physicians' prognosis-related communication with patients. Conclusions: Respondents identified uncertainties regarding the scope of oncology nurses' role in prognosis-related communication. Respondents also identified opportunities for improved interdisciplinary communication, most importantly the inclusion of oncology nurses in prognosis-related communication. Implications for Nursing: Opportunities for oncology nurses to bridge some gaps in prognosis-related communication likely exist, although barriers surrounding nurses' role, education, and communication within the context of the larger healthcare team need to be clarified if potential solutions are to be developed.",
author = "Paul Helft and Amy Chamness and Colin Terry and Margaret Uhrich",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1188/11.ONF.468-474",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "468--474",
journal = "Oncology Nursing Forum",
issn = "1538-0688",
publisher = "Oncology Nursing Society",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Oncology nurses' attitudes toward prognosis-related communication

T2 - A pilot mailed survey of oncology nursing society members

AU - Helft, Paul

AU - Chamness, Amy

AU - Terry, Colin

AU - Uhrich, Margaret

PY - 2011/7

Y1 - 2011/7

N2 - Purpose/Objectives: To assess oncology nurses' attitudes toward prognosis-related communication and experiences of the quality of such communication among physicians. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Nationwide survey in the United States. Sample: 394 Oncology Nursing Society members who completed surveys. Methods: Pilot mailed survey. Main Research Variables: Demographic variables, measures of attitudes toward and experiences of prognosis-related communication. Findings: Nurses had mixed views of prognosis-related communication and identified common barriers to their own more effective participation in prognosis-related communication. Nurses with more experience and those who worked in inpatient settings were more likely to be present for physicians' prognosis-related communication with patients. Conclusions: Respondents identified uncertainties regarding the scope of oncology nurses' role in prognosis-related communication. Respondents also identified opportunities for improved interdisciplinary communication, most importantly the inclusion of oncology nurses in prognosis-related communication. Implications for Nursing: Opportunities for oncology nurses to bridge some gaps in prognosis-related communication likely exist, although barriers surrounding nurses' role, education, and communication within the context of the larger healthcare team need to be clarified if potential solutions are to be developed.

AB - Purpose/Objectives: To assess oncology nurses' attitudes toward prognosis-related communication and experiences of the quality of such communication among physicians. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Nationwide survey in the United States. Sample: 394 Oncology Nursing Society members who completed surveys. Methods: Pilot mailed survey. Main Research Variables: Demographic variables, measures of attitudes toward and experiences of prognosis-related communication. Findings: Nurses had mixed views of prognosis-related communication and identified common barriers to their own more effective participation in prognosis-related communication. Nurses with more experience and those who worked in inpatient settings were more likely to be present for physicians' prognosis-related communication with patients. Conclusions: Respondents identified uncertainties regarding the scope of oncology nurses' role in prognosis-related communication. Respondents also identified opportunities for improved interdisciplinary communication, most importantly the inclusion of oncology nurses in prognosis-related communication. Implications for Nursing: Opportunities for oncology nurses to bridge some gaps in prognosis-related communication likely exist, although barriers surrounding nurses' role, education, and communication within the context of the larger healthcare team need to be clarified if potential solutions are to be developed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79959856707&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79959856707&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1188/11.ONF.468-474

DO - 10.1188/11.ONF.468-474

M3 - Article

C2 - 21708537

AN - SCOPUS:79959856707

VL - 38

SP - 468

EP - 474

JO - Oncology Nursing Forum

JF - Oncology Nursing Forum

SN - 1538-0688

IS - 4

ER -