Oncology nurses' experiences with prognosis-related communication with patients who have advanced cancer

Susan M. McLennon, Sue Lasiter, Wendy Miller, Kathryn Amlin, Amy R. Chamness, Paul Helft

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Oncology nurses have opportunities to engage in prognosis-related communication with patients who have advanced cancer but encounter barriers that impede the patient's understanding of prognosis, delay transitions to end-of-life care, and contribute to nonbeneficial treatments. Purpose: To describe nurses' experiences with prognosis-related communication with patients who have advanced cancer. Method: Thematic analysis of audio-recorded interviews with oncology nurses (n= 27). After data coding, themes were identified, and a thematic map was developed. Methods to ensure trustworthiness of the findings were used. Results: Six themes were identified: being in the middle, assessing the situation, barriers to prognosis communication, nurse actions, benefits of prognosis understanding, and negative outcomes. Nurses managed barriers through facilitation, collaboration, or independent actions to help patients with prognosis understanding. Conclusions: Shortcomings in prognosis-related communication with patients who have advanced cancer may contribute to negative outcomes for patients and nurses. Interventions that empower nurses to engage in prognosis communications are needed. Interprofessional communication skills education also may be beneficial.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)427-436
Number of pages10
JournalNursing Outlook
Volume61
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2013

Fingerprint

Nurses
Communication
Neoplasms
Terminal Care
Interviews
Education

Keywords

  • Advanced cancer
  • Communication
  • Oncology
  • Prognosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Oncology nurses' experiences with prognosis-related communication with patients who have advanced cancer. / McLennon, Susan M.; Lasiter, Sue; Miller, Wendy; Amlin, Kathryn; Chamness, Amy R.; Helft, Paul.

In: Nursing Outlook, Vol. 61, No. 6, 11.2013, p. 427-436.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McLennon, Susan M. ; Lasiter, Sue ; Miller, Wendy ; Amlin, Kathryn ; Chamness, Amy R. ; Helft, Paul. / Oncology nurses' experiences with prognosis-related communication with patients who have advanced cancer. In: Nursing Outlook. 2013 ; Vol. 61, No. 6. pp. 427-436.
@article{08b3d761611143cba11f8cb7017f2373,
title = "Oncology nurses' experiences with prognosis-related communication with patients who have advanced cancer",
abstract = "Background: Oncology nurses have opportunities to engage in prognosis-related communication with patients who have advanced cancer but encounter barriers that impede the patient's understanding of prognosis, delay transitions to end-of-life care, and contribute to nonbeneficial treatments. Purpose: To describe nurses' experiences with prognosis-related communication with patients who have advanced cancer. Method: Thematic analysis of audio-recorded interviews with oncology nurses (n= 27). After data coding, themes were identified, and a thematic map was developed. Methods to ensure trustworthiness of the findings were used. Results: Six themes were identified: being in the middle, assessing the situation, barriers to prognosis communication, nurse actions, benefits of prognosis understanding, and negative outcomes. Nurses managed barriers through facilitation, collaboration, or independent actions to help patients with prognosis understanding. Conclusions: Shortcomings in prognosis-related communication with patients who have advanced cancer may contribute to negative outcomes for patients and nurses. Interventions that empower nurses to engage in prognosis communications are needed. Interprofessional communication skills education also may be beneficial.",
keywords = "Advanced cancer, Communication, Oncology, Prognosis",
author = "McLennon, {Susan M.} and Sue Lasiter and Wendy Miller and Kathryn Amlin and Chamness, {Amy R.} and Paul Helft",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.outlook.2012.12.001",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
pages = "427--436",
journal = "Nursing Outlook",
issn = "0029-6554",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Oncology nurses' experiences with prognosis-related communication with patients who have advanced cancer

AU - McLennon, Susan M.

AU - Lasiter, Sue

AU - Miller, Wendy

AU - Amlin, Kathryn

AU - Chamness, Amy R.

AU - Helft, Paul

PY - 2013/11

Y1 - 2013/11

N2 - Background: Oncology nurses have opportunities to engage in prognosis-related communication with patients who have advanced cancer but encounter barriers that impede the patient's understanding of prognosis, delay transitions to end-of-life care, and contribute to nonbeneficial treatments. Purpose: To describe nurses' experiences with prognosis-related communication with patients who have advanced cancer. Method: Thematic analysis of audio-recorded interviews with oncology nurses (n= 27). After data coding, themes were identified, and a thematic map was developed. Methods to ensure trustworthiness of the findings were used. Results: Six themes were identified: being in the middle, assessing the situation, barriers to prognosis communication, nurse actions, benefits of prognosis understanding, and negative outcomes. Nurses managed barriers through facilitation, collaboration, or independent actions to help patients with prognosis understanding. Conclusions: Shortcomings in prognosis-related communication with patients who have advanced cancer may contribute to negative outcomes for patients and nurses. Interventions that empower nurses to engage in prognosis communications are needed. Interprofessional communication skills education also may be beneficial.

AB - Background: Oncology nurses have opportunities to engage in prognosis-related communication with patients who have advanced cancer but encounter barriers that impede the patient's understanding of prognosis, delay transitions to end-of-life care, and contribute to nonbeneficial treatments. Purpose: To describe nurses' experiences with prognosis-related communication with patients who have advanced cancer. Method: Thematic analysis of audio-recorded interviews with oncology nurses (n= 27). After data coding, themes were identified, and a thematic map was developed. Methods to ensure trustworthiness of the findings were used. Results: Six themes were identified: being in the middle, assessing the situation, barriers to prognosis communication, nurse actions, benefits of prognosis understanding, and negative outcomes. Nurses managed barriers through facilitation, collaboration, or independent actions to help patients with prognosis understanding. Conclusions: Shortcomings in prognosis-related communication with patients who have advanced cancer may contribute to negative outcomes for patients and nurses. Interventions that empower nurses to engage in prognosis communications are needed. Interprofessional communication skills education also may be beneficial.

KW - Advanced cancer

KW - Communication

KW - Oncology

KW - Prognosis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84888063338&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84888063338&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.outlook.2012.12.001

DO - 10.1016/j.outlook.2012.12.001

M3 - Article

C2 - 23402782

AN - SCOPUS:84888063338

VL - 61

SP - 427

EP - 436

JO - Nursing Outlook

JF - Nursing Outlook

SN - 0029-6554

IS - 6

ER -