Oncology outpatient and provider responses to a computerized symptom assessment system

Janet Carpenter, Susan Rawl, Jennifer Porter, Karen Schmidt, Jennifer Tornatta, Foluso Ojewole, Paul Helft, David A. Potter, Christopher Sweeney, R. Brian Giesler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose/Objectives: To assess patient and provider responses to a computerized symptom assessment system. Design: Descriptive, longitudinal study with retrospective, longitudinal medical records review. Setting: University-based National Cancer Institute-designated outpatient cancer center. Sample: 80 oncology outpatients receiving chemotherapy, 8 providers, and 30 medical records. Methods: Patients completed the computerized assessment during three chemotherapy follow-up clinic appointments (times 1, 2, and 3). Patient usability was recorded via an observer checklist (ease of use) and the computer (completion time). Patient satisfaction and impact were assessed during telephone interviews two to three days after times 1 and 3 only. Provider usability and impact were assessed at the end of the study using a questionnaire and focus groups, whereas effect on provider documentation was assessed through chart audits. Main Research Variables: Patient usability (ease of use, completion time), satisfaction, and impact; provider usability and impact. Findings: Patients reported good usability, high satisfaction, and modest impact on discussions with their providers. Providers reported modest usability, modest impact on discussions with patients, and had varied reactions as to how the system affected practice. Documentation of symptoms was largely absent before and after implementation. Conclusions: This system demonstrated good usability and satisfaction but had only a modest impact on symptom-related discussions and no impact on documentation. Implications for Nursing: A computerized system can help address barriers to symptom assessment but may not improve documentation unless it can be integrated into existing medical records systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)661-669
Number of pages9
JournalOncology Nursing Forum
Volume35
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2008

Fingerprint

Symptom Assessment
Outpatients
Documentation
Medical Records
Drug Therapy
National Cancer Institute (U.S.)
Focus Groups
Checklist
Patient Satisfaction
Longitudinal Studies
Appointments and Schedules
Nursing
Interviews
Research
Neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology(nursing)

Cite this

Oncology outpatient and provider responses to a computerized symptom assessment system. / Carpenter, Janet; Rawl, Susan; Porter, Jennifer; Schmidt, Karen; Tornatta, Jennifer; Ojewole, Foluso; Helft, Paul; Potter, David A.; Sweeney, Christopher; Giesler, R. Brian.

In: Oncology Nursing Forum, Vol. 35, No. 4, 01.01.2008, p. 661-669.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Carpenter, J, Rawl, S, Porter, J, Schmidt, K, Tornatta, J, Ojewole, F, Helft, P, Potter, DA, Sweeney, C & Giesler, RB 2008, 'Oncology outpatient and provider responses to a computerized symptom assessment system', Oncology Nursing Forum, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 661-669. https://doi.org/10.1188/08/ONF.661-669
Carpenter, Janet ; Rawl, Susan ; Porter, Jennifer ; Schmidt, Karen ; Tornatta, Jennifer ; Ojewole, Foluso ; Helft, Paul ; Potter, David A. ; Sweeney, Christopher ; Giesler, R. Brian. / Oncology outpatient and provider responses to a computerized symptom assessment system. In: Oncology Nursing Forum. 2008 ; Vol. 35, No. 4. pp. 661-669.
@article{adce9f983ace492b96fcdf69317c53df,
title = "Oncology outpatient and provider responses to a computerized symptom assessment system",
abstract = "Purpose/Objectives: To assess patient and provider responses to a computerized symptom assessment system. Design: Descriptive, longitudinal study with retrospective, longitudinal medical records review. Setting: University-based National Cancer Institute-designated outpatient cancer center. Sample: 80 oncology outpatients receiving chemotherapy, 8 providers, and 30 medical records. Methods: Patients completed the computerized assessment during three chemotherapy follow-up clinic appointments (times 1, 2, and 3). Patient usability was recorded via an observer checklist (ease of use) and the computer (completion time). Patient satisfaction and impact were assessed during telephone interviews two to three days after times 1 and 3 only. Provider usability and impact were assessed at the end of the study using a questionnaire and focus groups, whereas effect on provider documentation was assessed through chart audits. Main Research Variables: Patient usability (ease of use, completion time), satisfaction, and impact; provider usability and impact. Findings: Patients reported good usability, high satisfaction, and modest impact on discussions with their providers. Providers reported modest usability, modest impact on discussions with patients, and had varied reactions as to how the system affected practice. Documentation of symptoms was largely absent before and after implementation. Conclusions: This system demonstrated good usability and satisfaction but had only a modest impact on symptom-related discussions and no impact on documentation. Implications for Nursing: A computerized system can help address barriers to symptom assessment but may not improve documentation unless it can be integrated into existing medical records systems.",
author = "Janet Carpenter and Susan Rawl and Jennifer Porter and Karen Schmidt and Jennifer Tornatta and Foluso Ojewole and Paul Helft and Potter, {David A.} and Christopher Sweeney and Giesler, {R. Brian}",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1188/08/ONF.661-669",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "661--669",
journal = "Oncology Nursing Forum",
issn = "1538-0688",
publisher = "Oncology Nursing Society",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Oncology outpatient and provider responses to a computerized symptom assessment system

AU - Carpenter, Janet

AU - Rawl, Susan

AU - Porter, Jennifer

AU - Schmidt, Karen

AU - Tornatta, Jennifer

AU - Ojewole, Foluso

AU - Helft, Paul

AU - Potter, David A.

AU - Sweeney, Christopher

AU - Giesler, R. Brian

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - Purpose/Objectives: To assess patient and provider responses to a computerized symptom assessment system. Design: Descriptive, longitudinal study with retrospective, longitudinal medical records review. Setting: University-based National Cancer Institute-designated outpatient cancer center. Sample: 80 oncology outpatients receiving chemotherapy, 8 providers, and 30 medical records. Methods: Patients completed the computerized assessment during three chemotherapy follow-up clinic appointments (times 1, 2, and 3). Patient usability was recorded via an observer checklist (ease of use) and the computer (completion time). Patient satisfaction and impact were assessed during telephone interviews two to three days after times 1 and 3 only. Provider usability and impact were assessed at the end of the study using a questionnaire and focus groups, whereas effect on provider documentation was assessed through chart audits. Main Research Variables: Patient usability (ease of use, completion time), satisfaction, and impact; provider usability and impact. Findings: Patients reported good usability, high satisfaction, and modest impact on discussions with their providers. Providers reported modest usability, modest impact on discussions with patients, and had varied reactions as to how the system affected practice. Documentation of symptoms was largely absent before and after implementation. Conclusions: This system demonstrated good usability and satisfaction but had only a modest impact on symptom-related discussions and no impact on documentation. Implications for Nursing: A computerized system can help address barriers to symptom assessment but may not improve documentation unless it can be integrated into existing medical records systems.

AB - Purpose/Objectives: To assess patient and provider responses to a computerized symptom assessment system. Design: Descriptive, longitudinal study with retrospective, longitudinal medical records review. Setting: University-based National Cancer Institute-designated outpatient cancer center. Sample: 80 oncology outpatients receiving chemotherapy, 8 providers, and 30 medical records. Methods: Patients completed the computerized assessment during three chemotherapy follow-up clinic appointments (times 1, 2, and 3). Patient usability was recorded via an observer checklist (ease of use) and the computer (completion time). Patient satisfaction and impact were assessed during telephone interviews two to three days after times 1 and 3 only. Provider usability and impact were assessed at the end of the study using a questionnaire and focus groups, whereas effect on provider documentation was assessed through chart audits. Main Research Variables: Patient usability (ease of use, completion time), satisfaction, and impact; provider usability and impact. Findings: Patients reported good usability, high satisfaction, and modest impact on discussions with their providers. Providers reported modest usability, modest impact on discussions with patients, and had varied reactions as to how the system affected practice. Documentation of symptoms was largely absent before and after implementation. Conclusions: This system demonstrated good usability and satisfaction but had only a modest impact on symptom-related discussions and no impact on documentation. Implications for Nursing: A computerized system can help address barriers to symptom assessment but may not improve documentation unless it can be integrated into existing medical records systems.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047684935&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047684935&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1188/08/ONF.661-669

DO - 10.1188/08/ONF.661-669

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 661

EP - 669

JO - Oncology Nursing Forum

JF - Oncology Nursing Forum

SN - 1538-0688

IS - 4

ER -