One versus two proficient laparoscopic surgeons for laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy

Tibério M. Siqueira, Thomas Gardner, Ramsay L. Kuo, Ryan F. Paterson, Larry H. Stevens, James E. Lingeman, Arieh L. Shalhav

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives. To compare the laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) results obtained by two different surgical teams, one consisting of a proficient laparoscopic surgeon assisted by an inexperienced laparoscopic surgeon and another consisting of two proficient laparoscopic surgeons. With more centers embarking on LDN programs, it is important to identify the factors that can improve overall outcomes during the initial learning curve. Methods. A retrospective review was performed of the initial 70 sequential LDNs performed between October 1998 and March 2001 at our institutions. The procedures were stratified into two groups. Group 1 consisted of LDN cases performed by one proficient laparoscopic surgeon and an inexperienced laparoscopic surgeon (resident, fellow, or faculty) as the first assistant; group 2 consisted of cases performed by two proficient laparoscopic surgeons. Results. Twenty-six LDNs were performed by group 1 and 44 by group 2. The total operative time and estimated blood loss showed a statistically significant decrease in group 2 compared with group 1, 143 ± 32 minutes versus 218 ± 38 minutes (P <0.001) and 92 ± 115 mL versus 158 ± 148 mL (P = 0.044), respectively. Two major complications occurred in group 1 (7.7%) and two major complications occurred in group 2 (4.5%). The 3-month postoperative recipient creatinine levels were similar for both groups, 1.6 ± 1.3 versus 1.4 ± 0.4 (P = 0.408). Conclusions. A surgical team composed of two proficient laparoscopic surgeons during the early learning curve of LDN may allow safe and efficient development of a laparoscopic live donor renal transplantation program.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)406-409
Number of pages4
JournalUrology
Volume60
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002

Fingerprint

Nephrectomy
Tissue Donors
Learning Curve
Operative Time
Surgeons
Kidney Transplantation
Creatinine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Siqueira, T. M., Gardner, T., Kuo, R. L., Paterson, R. F., Stevens, L. H., Lingeman, J. E., & Shalhav, A. L. (2002). One versus two proficient laparoscopic surgeons for laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Urology, 60(3), 406-409. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(02)01848-4

One versus two proficient laparoscopic surgeons for laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. / Siqueira, Tibério M.; Gardner, Thomas; Kuo, Ramsay L.; Paterson, Ryan F.; Stevens, Larry H.; Lingeman, James E.; Shalhav, Arieh L.

In: Urology, Vol. 60, No. 3, 2002, p. 406-409.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Siqueira, TM, Gardner, T, Kuo, RL, Paterson, RF, Stevens, LH, Lingeman, JE & Shalhav, AL 2002, 'One versus two proficient laparoscopic surgeons for laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy', Urology, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 406-409. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(02)01848-4
Siqueira, Tibério M. ; Gardner, Thomas ; Kuo, Ramsay L. ; Paterson, Ryan F. ; Stevens, Larry H. ; Lingeman, James E. ; Shalhav, Arieh L. / One versus two proficient laparoscopic surgeons for laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. In: Urology. 2002 ; Vol. 60, No. 3. pp. 406-409.
@article{7d426197f980483186272dabfd296a95,
title = "One versus two proficient laparoscopic surgeons for laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy",
abstract = "Objectives. To compare the laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) results obtained by two different surgical teams, one consisting of a proficient laparoscopic surgeon assisted by an inexperienced laparoscopic surgeon and another consisting of two proficient laparoscopic surgeons. With more centers embarking on LDN programs, it is important to identify the factors that can improve overall outcomes during the initial learning curve. Methods. A retrospective review was performed of the initial 70 sequential LDNs performed between October 1998 and March 2001 at our institutions. The procedures were stratified into two groups. Group 1 consisted of LDN cases performed by one proficient laparoscopic surgeon and an inexperienced laparoscopic surgeon (resident, fellow, or faculty) as the first assistant; group 2 consisted of cases performed by two proficient laparoscopic surgeons. Results. Twenty-six LDNs were performed by group 1 and 44 by group 2. The total operative time and estimated blood loss showed a statistically significant decrease in group 2 compared with group 1, 143 ± 32 minutes versus 218 ± 38 minutes (P <0.001) and 92 ± 115 mL versus 158 ± 148 mL (P = 0.044), respectively. Two major complications occurred in group 1 (7.7{\%}) and two major complications occurred in group 2 (4.5{\%}). The 3-month postoperative recipient creatinine levels were similar for both groups, 1.6 ± 1.3 versus 1.4 ± 0.4 (P = 0.408). Conclusions. A surgical team composed of two proficient laparoscopic surgeons during the early learning curve of LDN may allow safe and efficient development of a laparoscopic live donor renal transplantation program.",
author = "Siqueira, {Tib{\'e}rio M.} and Thomas Gardner and Kuo, {Ramsay L.} and Paterson, {Ryan F.} and Stevens, {Larry H.} and Lingeman, {James E.} and Shalhav, {Arieh L.}",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1016/S0090-4295(02)01848-4",
language = "English",
volume = "60",
pages = "406--409",
journal = "Urology",
issn = "0090-4295",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - One versus two proficient laparoscopic surgeons for laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy

AU - Siqueira, Tibério M.

AU - Gardner, Thomas

AU - Kuo, Ramsay L.

AU - Paterson, Ryan F.

AU - Stevens, Larry H.

AU - Lingeman, James E.

AU - Shalhav, Arieh L.

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Objectives. To compare the laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) results obtained by two different surgical teams, one consisting of a proficient laparoscopic surgeon assisted by an inexperienced laparoscopic surgeon and another consisting of two proficient laparoscopic surgeons. With more centers embarking on LDN programs, it is important to identify the factors that can improve overall outcomes during the initial learning curve. Methods. A retrospective review was performed of the initial 70 sequential LDNs performed between October 1998 and March 2001 at our institutions. The procedures were stratified into two groups. Group 1 consisted of LDN cases performed by one proficient laparoscopic surgeon and an inexperienced laparoscopic surgeon (resident, fellow, or faculty) as the first assistant; group 2 consisted of cases performed by two proficient laparoscopic surgeons. Results. Twenty-six LDNs were performed by group 1 and 44 by group 2. The total operative time and estimated blood loss showed a statistically significant decrease in group 2 compared with group 1, 143 ± 32 minutes versus 218 ± 38 minutes (P <0.001) and 92 ± 115 mL versus 158 ± 148 mL (P = 0.044), respectively. Two major complications occurred in group 1 (7.7%) and two major complications occurred in group 2 (4.5%). The 3-month postoperative recipient creatinine levels were similar for both groups, 1.6 ± 1.3 versus 1.4 ± 0.4 (P = 0.408). Conclusions. A surgical team composed of two proficient laparoscopic surgeons during the early learning curve of LDN may allow safe and efficient development of a laparoscopic live donor renal transplantation program.

AB - Objectives. To compare the laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) results obtained by two different surgical teams, one consisting of a proficient laparoscopic surgeon assisted by an inexperienced laparoscopic surgeon and another consisting of two proficient laparoscopic surgeons. With more centers embarking on LDN programs, it is important to identify the factors that can improve overall outcomes during the initial learning curve. Methods. A retrospective review was performed of the initial 70 sequential LDNs performed between October 1998 and March 2001 at our institutions. The procedures were stratified into two groups. Group 1 consisted of LDN cases performed by one proficient laparoscopic surgeon and an inexperienced laparoscopic surgeon (resident, fellow, or faculty) as the first assistant; group 2 consisted of cases performed by two proficient laparoscopic surgeons. Results. Twenty-six LDNs were performed by group 1 and 44 by group 2. The total operative time and estimated blood loss showed a statistically significant decrease in group 2 compared with group 1, 143 ± 32 minutes versus 218 ± 38 minutes (P <0.001) and 92 ± 115 mL versus 158 ± 148 mL (P = 0.044), respectively. Two major complications occurred in group 1 (7.7%) and two major complications occurred in group 2 (4.5%). The 3-month postoperative recipient creatinine levels were similar for both groups, 1.6 ± 1.3 versus 1.4 ± 0.4 (P = 0.408). Conclusions. A surgical team composed of two proficient laparoscopic surgeons during the early learning curve of LDN may allow safe and efficient development of a laparoscopic live donor renal transplantation program.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036753744&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036753744&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0090-4295(02)01848-4

DO - 10.1016/S0090-4295(02)01848-4

M3 - Article

C2 - 12350472

AN - SCOPUS:0036753744

VL - 60

SP - 406

EP - 409

JO - Urology

JF - Urology

SN - 0090-4295

IS - 3

ER -